• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Directed Energy Weapons ??

HereticHulk said:
So how many delusional CTers have you guys converted here? Some smart mofo's in this place! Presumptuous, but very intelligent! I'm just looking for some truth! And the government's story does not hold water in my opinion.

Does anyone here feel that out government had any hand in it? We've killed many US soldiers and (estimated) 1M civilians in Iraq based on lies thus far, what makes you think the 9/11 story is any different? There is no way that we would be over in Iraq and Afghanistan and raddling swords w/ Iran if 9/11 didn't happen.
Click to expand...

Please state your source for that number of Iraqis killed. The best estimates I have seen state no more than 100,000, not one million. I'll have to see if I can locate my sources to provide for you in return.

HereticHulk said:
This was all laid out in the PNAC manifesto and it all seems to be playing out in real life.

Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen to get us into WWII. Before Pearl Harbor the majority of the American Public wanted no part in that war. The rest is history. 9/11 just seemed too convenient to be any thing but staged.

Someone humor me and tell me what the problem with the ae911 truth people.
Click to expand...

Ahhh, I see now; you're of the mjd school of thought. Either that, or you are him (since I believe he's been suspended). He's been thoroughly debunked in several threads; try looking them up and enlighten yourself regarding PNAC, thank you. And as for ae911 truth, they do not check the credentials of the people who join their page; as an experiment, several people here joined the page offering fake credentials and (in some cases) ludicrous names that, had there been the slightest amount of fact checking, would have shouted loud and clear to the ae911 people that there were numerous fakes in their list. None of this was done. I believe many of those people are still listed on the page. In addition, virtually none of the people on that page have any better than bachelor's degrees and therefore do not have the necessary credentials to challenge the experts (the ones with Ph.D.s and decades worth of experience), or, as in many cases, they aren't even members of the structural engineering crowd; there are a bunch of math people, a few architects, and others who have different specialties than the ones required to actually make the questions they ask legitimate.

Hope that answers your question.
 
HereticHulk said:
considering the Pearl Harbor attack was provoked by our foreign policies with Japan, leaving Japan 2 choices, dishonor themselves and surrender or attack us.
Click to expand...
And what Japanese actions was it that caused the U.S. to adopt the policies it did? The brutal invasion and occupation of China. For an example of the level of brutality the Japanese military forces used, I refer you to the infamous event commonly called The Rape of Nanking.

Also, Japan's original war plans called for the attack to start in the Philippines, to draw the U.S. Pacific Fleet into a climactic battle in Japanese waters. Interestingly enough, that was what the original U.S. war plans were expecting.

It was only at Admiral Yamamoto's insistence that the Japanese war plans were changed to incorporate a risky and daring first strike at Pearl Harbor.

HereticHulk said:
facts of Pearl Harbor have recently been sufficiently exposed by books from Robert Stinnett & George Victor (respectively) for anyone who cares to transcend the myth.
Click to expand...
We asked for evidence and you give us book ads. Can you actually point to something easily available to support your thesis? Could you at least post excerpts from your book sources which support your thesis?
 
Ah, I see it now. If one declares that 911 was too conveeeeeeenient not to have been staged, it is not necessary to actually provide any proof it was staged; how could it NOT have been?

A sure-fire debate dominating technique!
 
Corsair 115 said:
We asked for evidence and you give us book ads. Can you actually point to something easily available to support your thesis? Could you at least post excerpts from your book sources which support your thesis?
Click to expand...

Clearly you missed both these books being available ON AMAZON so they must be true. :rolleyes:
 
Directed Energy Weapons: Now operational



Do not post articles without citing the source. Do not post copyrighted material in entirety - we recommend a paragraph. It's also inadvisable to continually post links and articles without providing any comments or input.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Active Denial System
(From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

The Active Denial System (ADS) is a non-lethal, directed-energy weapon developed by the U.S. military.
It is a strong millimeter-wave transmitter used for crowd control (the "goodbye effect".
Informally, the weapon is also called pain ray.
Raytheon is currently marketing a reduced range version of this technology.

The ADS is currently being considered for deployment in the Iraq War. ADS has also been present at various public events in the United States. It is unclear if the government has sought any authorization to deploy the weapon at home or did so without public input.

Edited by chillzero: 

(more available ... "Active Denial Systems" are old news by now)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To SaiGirl, welcome.

I must remind you to read your Membership Agreement. Posting articles, sourced or not, without comment is called "spamming" and will earn you a short tenure here.

Also, some of us actually work with the systems you evidently just found out about, and others have been aware of them for some time. They cannot possibly do what you evidently think they did. If anything, they prove the utter infeasibility of any space-beam WTC destruction idea. They're four orders of magnitude or more too weak.

Four orders of magnitude. This is like saying just because there are cars that go 100 MPH, it's possible for Them to drive around the Earth in only 90 seconds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom