• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Directed Energy Weapons ??

Update of my link in post #18: http://www.kirtland.af.mil/afrl_de/
Directed Energy Directorate of the Air Force Research Laboratory.

I agree with RMackey. I don't believe there is a DEW available powerful enough to bring down a building, much less be space based.
 
I always wanted to direct. I thought beam weapons would be a good start, then I could work my way up to projectiles, and maybe even depleted uranium.

What do you think? Did I do a good job with this one?
 
If the Dr. Morgan Reynold case had no merit, why wouldn't the courts just dismiss it?

Tesla had technologies related to DE back in his day! Just because a weapon of this sophistication has not been disclosed to us, doesn't mean it doesn't exist in the capacity to do what he claims.

Still waiting for someone to debunk how that steel spire just turned to dust and blew away!?
 
HereticHulk said:
Tesla had technologies related to DE back in his day! Just because a weapon of this sophistication has not been disclosed to us, doesn't mean it doesn't exist in the capacity to do what he claims.

Still waiting for someone to debunk how that steel spire just turned to dust and blew away!?
Click to expand...


Firstly, you are committing the argument from ignorance fallacy.

Secondly, there have been a number of replies to your silly claim about the core section. You have simply ignored them.
 
I've just zipped back in time to 9-11-2001 using the time tunnel. Believe me, no DEW's where used that day.

This is a true story.

Just because the time tunnel has not been disclosed to us, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
 
HereticHulk said:
Still waiting for someone to debunk how that steel spire just turned to dust and blew away!?
Click to expand...

The problem is that if one doesn't think that it 'just turned to dust and blew away' then there's no reason to debunk it.

Frankly unless you can show that it did indeed 'turn to dust' then why bother to put the cart before the horse and ask us to debunk something that probably doesn't exist in the first place?
 
HereticHulk said:
If the Dr. Morgan Reynold case had no merit, why wouldn't the courts just dismiss it?

Tesla had technologies related to DE back in his day! Just because a weapon of this sophistication has not been disclosed to us, doesn't mean it doesn't exist in the capacity to do what he claims.

Still waiting for someone to debunk how that steel spire just turned to dust and blew away!?
Click to expand...

Are you talking about the suit discussed in this thread: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=91147 by chance?

And we can take it as a given that you have chosen to ignore this video where the spire DOESN'T disentigrate and can clearly be seen falling?

 
HereticHulk said:
[snip]
Still waiting for someone to debunk how that steel spire just turned to dust and blew away!?
Click to expand...

That's because the steel didn't just turn to dust and blow away. Did you watch the higher resolution version of the exact same footage provided by Bell above? Here it is again: no disintegration. Watch it. Tell me how you could still possibly believe the core turned to dust after viewing this.

Please, don't be wilfully ignorant. That's not a good place to be.
 
HereticHulk said:
Tesla had technologies related to DE back in his day!
Click to expand...

He was a man outta time, man outta time.
Said you was outta your mind!

You took a shot and it did you in.
Edison's medicine.
You played your cards, but you couldn't win.
Edison's medicine.

rock.gif
 
HereticHulk said:
.....
Still waiting for someone to debunk how that steel spire just turned to dust and blew away!?
Click to expand...
Let me guess. No matter how reasonable an argument that anyone presents to the premise of your accusation, you will ignore or dismiss it.

Are you willing to change your opinion based on facts and reality? Can you prove that space beams capable of doing this exist? (gad, I can't believe I just typed that).
 
HereticHulk said:
How else do you explain the spire completely disintegrating?
[qimg]http_://drjudywood.com_/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image42.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Hi Ace. Welcome back!

Just sit back and make yourself comfortable. Lisa Simpson, Darat or one of the other mods will be along to re-ban you shortly.
 
I wasn't banned!? Not that I was aware of anyway! Do people get banned for not agreeing with the shills here? ..sad

Are we watching the same video? The spire starts to fall and disappears into dust. It does not support any of the collapse theories fed to us by the 9/11 Omission report.

The Russians have developed a weapon that would better fit the collapse scenario we witnessed that day.

ht_tp://ap.google.c_om/article/ALeqM5jixX4YqeeXCrWvmEEv9JMABhXmVw

Thermobaric weapons work on the same principle that causes blasts in grain elevators and other dusty places — clouds of fine particles are highly explosive. Such explosions produce shock waves that can be directed and amplified in enclosed spaces such as buildings, caves or tunnels.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
HereticHulk said:
I wasn't banned!? Not that I was aware of anyway! Do people get banned for not agreeing with the shills here? ..sad

Are we watching the same video? The spire starts to fall and disappears into dust. It does not support any of the collapse theories fed to us by the 9/11 Omission report.

The Russians have developed a weapon that would better fit the collapse scenario we witnessed that day.

ht_tp://ap.google.c_om/article/ALeqM5jixX4YqeeXCrWvmEEv9JMABhXmVw
Click to expand...
Wanna explain using some actual physics and math-like stuff that might actually explain how big something like this would have to be to do the stuff you credit it with doing? Where was it housed, and where was it used from? I have lots of other questions, but these will do for now. If you don't answer with something other than speculation, I will consider your answer to be "I don't freaking know, what do I look like, a smart person or something? This makes my brain hurt, and you're a big meany for asking!".
 
HereticHulk, your 9/11 omission report joke is a very funny joke and one we didn't hear before.

But please... energy weapons? That dissintegrate the WTC to dust?

Cut down on watching Warner Bros cartoons, won't you?

bleep bleep!!
 
JimBenArm said:
Wanna explain using some actual physics and math-like stuff that might actually explain how big something like this would have to be to do the stuff you credit it with doing? Where was it housed, and where was it used from? I have lots of other questions, but these will do for now. If you don't answer with something other than speculation, I will consider your answer to be "I don't freaking know, what do I look like, a smart person or something? This makes my brain hurt, and you're a big meany for asking!".
Click to expand...

I don't freakin know!:D My guess is that is had to be fired from a satellite or maybe from one of the doomsday planes flying around at all 3 impact sites?? The point of the link I posted is that there is technology available and the thoery is plausible. Much more so that the government's theory.

If I knew the physics and implementation of secret weapon technology, I certainly would not be here speculating about it on a forum with you folks! We'll just have to keep an eye on Morgan Reynolds' court case.

Do you wanna explain how the majority of the jet fuel that (clearly) all burned up outside the building and subsequent office fire from the remaining fuel burned hot enough to weaken steel and specifically turn this spire into dust causing a universal collapse? The spire clearly turns to dust as it begins to fall. Even if a plane did sever a few of the large beams of steel, what would cause the entire building support structure to fail simultaneously? You cannot deny the fact that the majority of mass that was The WTC was virtually pulverized in dust. A office fire caused this???

There are quite a few structural engineers that admit the collapse they witnessed that day would not have been caused by the fires and impacts alone.
 
HereticHulk said:
Do you wanna explain how the majority of the jet fuel that (clearly) all burned up outside the building and subsequent office fire from the remaining fuel burned hot enough to weaken steel and specifically turn this spire into dust causing a universal collapse?
Click to expand...
You seem to be under the impression that an office fire doesn't burn very hot. That is an incorrect impression. They can burn very hot, especially considering the amount of various kinds of plastics used in a modern office — plastics can burn quite vigorously. I'm sure one of the resident folks with the applicable firefighting knowledge will be along shortly to supply the appropriate details.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom