• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Directed Energy Weapons ??

DontAskMe

Student
D
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
37
I have been advised that these absolutely do exist, I have never heard of them, google isnt any help...

Can someone explain what this is, or more accurately, do they exist and if not how do I explain that with credible links, etc. ??
 
DontAskMe said:
I have been advised that these absolutely do exist, I have never heard of them, google isnt any help...

Can someone explain what this is, or more accurately, do they exist and if not how do I explain that with credible links, etc. ??
Click to expand...

Depends on what you're talking about. "Directed energy" is quite ambiguous. I remember reading that we do have such tools based on some of the ideas that Tesla came up with, for things like small medical applications, etc- but as for the big space weapons/air squadron destroyers... no.

I also remember reading an article responding to some of the weather manufacturing claims that point out that the 2nd law of thermodynamics shows that such things cannot exist in reality. I'm no physics major, though.
 
At a high level, would not a laser be a "directed energy weapon"? The issue with these wrt WTC is that power needed to be effective on the scale, and at the distances necessary, is prohibitive.
 
Yes, things like the Airborne Laser are "directed energy" weapons. They exist, and function, but they can't do most of the fantastic stuff that some people claim they can.

And anything that mentions HAARP or weather control is just insane, and should probably be discounted automatically.
 
DontAskMe said:
I have been advised that these absolutely do exist, I have never heard of them, google isnt any help...

Can someone explain what this is, or more accurately, do they exist and if not how do I explain that with credible links, etc. ??
Click to expand...
Broaden your search to "Particle Beam Weapons". You'll get the skinny on endoatmospheric, exoatmospheric and the phone book on anti-missile defense.

The twoofers seem to think that if this type of weaponry has been wished for, or researched, or funded, or lab-tested in smaller scale or whatnot - then they HAVE to be considered as a plausible explanation for destruction of the WTC complex. I had one twoofer try to explain, in twooferly fashion, that these giant beam weapons were "hidden" amongst all the orbiting space junk. Twoofers will say anything to avoid admitting that they are dead wrong.
 
I used to direct energy beam weapons. They are such prima donnas, though, always wanting to have the spotlight!

That's why I switched to producer. Less stress.
 
The latest 'theory' about directed beam weapons being used to bring the towers and WTC 7 down was put forth by Woods and Reynolds.

Last I looked at their webpage devoted to this they had not even bothered to give any niggling little technical details such as the type of 'beam', laser or particle, let alone come up with a frequency of a laser or type of particle that could affect steel and concrete in the manner that they characterize was occuring on 9/11/01, nor had they calculated the power output of such a device(if 100% efficient it would have to equal the power required to do what they characterize as occuring on 9/11/01) or what power source could be ustilized to run the weapon.

In other words the whole thing is no better than anything Gene Roddenberry came up with for the various "Star Trek" series', it all fantasy.
 
JimBenArm said:
I used to direct energy beam weapons. They are such prima donnas, though, always wanting to have the spotlight!

That's why I switched to producer. Less stress.
Click to expand...
I hear ya. They still tell that story on the Warner Brothers lot when you were directing "You Can Call Me Ray". Remember? The beam weapon went into its trailer for the meal break, then wouldn't come out until its trailer interior was decorated in mauve and teal color tones. Because they reminded it of its home planet.

So cool how you got it to come out. Remember you got a bunch of extras to gather in the commissary parking lot? They all were wearing mauve and teal T-shirts with "9/11 Was An Inside Job" on them. Beamo busted open the trailer door quicker than you could say "Pull it!", and you were able to get the shot. Oh, do the boys laugh and love telling that one at WB...
 
c4ts said:
What about rifles? Don't they direct kinetic energy?
Click to expand...

Taking this to the next level, a plane flown into a building is a weapon used to direct kinetic energy as well.

Oh my god, the towers were destroyed by directed energy weapons!

Holy ◊◊◊◊!
 
JonnyFive said:
Taking this to the next level, a plane flown into a building is a weapon used to direct kinetic energy as well.

Oh my god, the towers were destroyed by directed energy weapons!

Holy ◊◊◊◊!
Click to expand...
You left out "Conspiracy!!!!!11111!11"
 
Beam weapons do exist, and are a whooole lotta fun :D
Of course, what the truthers propose is more than a little outlandish, something to that scale and power would be rediculously inefficient, if not impossible to produce with current technology.

But still, as I said, existing one's can be a lot of fun! I'm thinking about building one of these to play with: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolaser
 
Hey Guys???

What's with all the questions. Judy Wood said of the beam weapon, "I don't think we even have to define it." So, can't you just stick to one topic for an entire sentence?

Clearly, a beam or ray of energy or particles (or perhaps, paradoxically, both) turned the top of the world trade center into a giant snowball, and sucked the 'dustified' steel into the upper atmosphere. Clearly, as show in one still photograph. No debris fell that day.
 
OK, thanks...now I see, since it cant be proven they dont exist, they must exist for their purpose
 
burnvictim77 said:
Hey Guys???

What's with all the questions. Judy Wood said of the beam weapon, "I don't think we even have to define it." So, can't you just stick to one topic for an entire sentence?

Clearly, a beam or ray of energy or particles (or perhaps, paradoxically, both) turned the top of the world trade center into a giant snowball, and sucked the 'dustified' steel into the upper atmosphere. Clearly, as show in one still photograph. No debris fell that day.
Click to expand...
<LtCG>
N'I don' care who y'ar; that's funny raight thar.
</LtCG>
 
Directed Energy weapons do exist. It's a verifiable fact. They can be found in any number of laboratories as small prototypes.

I want one of those new Navy railguns.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom