Dinosaurs and DRAGONS!!

[Eos of the Eons]

WTH is Adam doing squatting naked behind a tree with a sheep?

Um, the funders have an issue with NUDITY, not with hiding behind sheep behind trees, or whatever, no matter what that may look like to heathen evolutionists, cuz the funders are far too pious to think such ways

 

[Amapola]

The funders obviously have no clue about the nature of lambs if they think one is going to stay still long enough to provide "camoflauge".

 

[Eos of the Eons]

Well, nothing about the place is "real" anyways

 

[Soapy Sam]

The funders obviously have no clue about the nature of lambs if they think one is going to stay still long enough to provide "camoflauge".

This is the place Dawkins visited in his "Root of all Evil" programme?

Deeply silly.

I recall a P.J.O'Rourke article describing his visit to Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker's "Hometown USA" theme park. He concluded Jim and Tam were Satanists, as nobody could be stupid enough to take the place seriously. Ed knows what he'd make of this bunch of halfwits.

 

[Eos of the Eons]

I dunno... what did he think of the Discovery institute?

This "museum" is really going to be spankin' with all the kewl dragons, but I wonder what it will look like in a few years, unless the funders want to keep putting a lot into upkeep. I mean, one of the guys putting it together used to work for Universal Sudios, and I hear that place is kinda fun and full fantastic stuffs...

*scratches head*

Its designer, Patrick Marsh, used to work at Universal Studios in Los Angeles and then in Japan before he saw the light, opened his soul to Jesus, and was born anew.

Meh, I think he saw dollar signs myself.

 

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

Wait, are they saying that dinosaurs turned into dragons? I thought they didn't believe in evolution?

No, "micro-evolution" is OK within Bibilical 'kinds'. It's "macro-evolution" they have a problem with.

The important thing is to define a 'kind' in anyway that allows an escape from any specific hole they have just dug for themselves. It is also important not to expect any consistency in the application of this principle.

All we need to do is convince them that bacteria are the same 'kind' as people...

 

[ponderingturtle]

No, "micro-evolution" is OK within Bibilical 'kinds'. It's "macro-evolution" they have a problem with.

The important thing is to define a 'kind' in anyway that allows an escape from any specific hole they have just dug for themselves. It is also important not to expect any consistency in the application of this principle.

All we need to do is convince them that bacteria are the same 'kind' as people...

Some of them really like evolution as an explanation of all the modern kinds of life vs what could have fit in the Arc