dogjones
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2005
- Messages
- 1,303
Following on from the absinthe thread. Lots of people, including me, tend to attribute differing kinds of 'drunk' to differing kinds of alcohol. For instance, tequila seems to give me a silly 'speedy' drunk, but scotch gives me quite a 'mellow' drunk. Others say they can't drink scotch cos it makes them angry, but are perfectly ok with rum. Etc, etc.
Is there any real evidence that different types of booze affect people in different ways? I mean, the only active ingredient is alcohol is it not? So surely any differences would be cultural, or psychosomatic?
Of course, beer would tend to affect you differently than wine or spirits, as they all have differing alcohol contents, bubbles, etc - lots of variation. But sticking to the differences between spirits - would a 40% vodka have a tangibly different physical / psychoactive effect than a 40% whisky?
Is there any real evidence that different types of booze affect people in different ways? I mean, the only active ingredient is alcohol is it not? So surely any differences would be cultural, or psychosomatic?
Of course, beer would tend to affect you differently than wine or spirits, as they all have differing alcohol contents, bubbles, etc - lots of variation. But sticking to the differences between spirits - would a 40% vodka have a tangibly different physical / psychoactive effect than a 40% whisky?