LibraryLady
Emeritus
I think the line gets drawn at what people can help doing or being. Mr. Patterson is blind, which he can't help. However, making fun of Dan Rather's pomposity, for example, is fair game because he could learn not to be pompous.
I think the line gets drawn at what people can help doing or being. Mr. Patterson is blind, which he can't help. However, making fun of Dan Rather's pomposity, for example, is fair game because he could learn not to be pompous.
What about humor based on racial or cultural stereotypes; is that ever funny?
Oh, get off your high horse.
[qimg]http://www.newprophecy.net/Christopher_Reeve_paralysis_victim.gif[/qimg]

What about humor based on racial or cultural stereotypes; is that ever funny?
SNL made fun of Stevie Wonder when Eddie Murphy impersonated him. Poor taste is the hallmark of SNL. Apparently you only discovered this when the target is a liberal politician. As far as disabled people being off-limits to parody, that would be considered treating them differently from able people. FDR never wanted any special dispensation.
LawnOven said:What about humor based on racial or cultural stereotypes; is that ever funny?
In my own humble and lowbrow opinion, the answer is YES.
Quite often.
So how did he "see" the SNL skit?
It's at the speed of thought. As a human being, I find it second nature to hear a funny joke and know why it's funny.
Perhaps you have a problem with such rapid thought evaluations?
Do you also find it difficult to chew gum while attempting to claim someone is being too PC?