Did Jackie Kennedy kill JFK?

Anders Lindman said:
There is also the "driver was the shooter" theory. Those are possibly conspiracy baits. Presented to the public as smokescreens. Leading conspiracy believers into endless detours.

I think it's an example of the 'big lie' tactics.

"... in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation." -- Adolf Hitler , Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie
Click to expand...

Well when you bring in uncle Adolf to testify how could we not believe you.:rolleyes:
 
If the pistol were that small so as:
1) not to be seen, and
2) have no visible recoil,

it would have to shoot a very small bullet (.32 ACP at absolute maximum). Such a small and weak round could not have done nearly enough damage to JFK to emulate a high powered rifle round.
 
dtugg said:
She didn't. Since she didn't shoot him, it isn't an issue.

Think about it, who had more to gain from JFK's death, Jackie or LBJ?
Click to expand...

I admit that it's really strange if Jackie killed JFK, yet that's what it looks like to me. On the other hand, it was probably something planned many years beforehand. For example, LBJ tricked JFK into ordering the moon mission, as a part of that plan. First making JFK ordering the moon mission and then to be sacrificed, in such a way that the public could not be told that the moon mission was ludicrous and impossible. Big lies all the way.

LBJ rolling his eyes and smirking in contempt at the moon mission proposal: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_JlSdRCg7g
 
dtugg said:
Who fired the other shot that hit him (and Connally), smart guy?
Click to expand...

In my opinion there was no second shot. Something hit JFK in the throat, that's true, but it was not an ordinary bullet. Mr. Connally only pretended to be hit.
 
TheRedWorm said:
If the pistol were that small so as:
1) not to be seen, and
2) have no visible recoil,

it would have to shoot a very small bullet (.32 ACP at absolute maximum). Such a small and weak round could not have done nearly enough damage to JFK to emulate a high powered rifle round.
Click to expand...

Are you sure? An expanding bullet would have been used: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0irGSY-da8

And a small weapon, such as: http://www.google.com/products/cata...ult&ct=result&resnum=3&sqi=2&ved=0CC0Q8wIwAg#
 
Even so, the low velocity and mass would guarantee that not much damage would be done, at least externally. Hell, it might not even penetrate that far into the skull.
 
No she didn't and I find it quite hard to believe you are seriously advocating it. So why are you advocating it?
 
Soily said:
No she didn't and I find it quite hard to believe you are seriously advocating it. So why are you advocating it?
Click to expand...

Tip to Anders: When Soily says your theory is ridiculous, you should listen.
 
i think Mr Zapruder did it, he had a camera pointed right at him and it could have been a camera gun. Who's gonna notice a gun when you've got a camera in your hand and he's perfect on the angle of the head shot. No doubt about it, Zapruder done it.
 
The assassination of JFK was a part of a larger plan.

In a memorandum to JFK, 28 April 1961, LBJ writes: "Manned exploration of the moon, for example, is not only an achievement with great propaganda value, but it is essential as an objective..." -- From: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/Apollomon/apollo2.pdf

This was probably a lie, since scientists later told JFK:

Part of a transcript of a Presidential Meeting, 21 November 1962:

"President Kennedy: Look, I know all these other things and the satellite and the communications and weather and all, they’re all desirable, but they can wait.

James Webb: I’m not putting those…. I am talking now about the scientific program to understand the space environment within which you got to fly Apollo and make a landing on the Moon.

President Kennedy: Wait a minute—is that saying that the lunar program to land the man on the Moon is the top priority of the Agency, is it?

Unknown speaker: And the science that goes with it….

Robert Seamans: Well, yes, if you add that, the science that is necessary….

President Kennedy: The science…. Going to the Moon is the top-priority project. Now, there are a lot of related scientific information and developments that will come from that which are important. But the whole thrust of the Agency, in my opinion, is the lunar program. The rest of it can wait six or nine months.

...

James Webb: All right, then let me say this: if I go out and say that this is the number-one priority and that everything else must give way to it, I’m going to lose an important element of support for your program and for your administration.

President Kennedy [interrupting]: By who? Who? What people? Who?

James Webb: By a large number of people.

President Kennedy: Who? Who?

James Webb: Well, particularly the brainy people in industry and in the universities who are looking at a solid base."

From: http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...+Jerome+Wiesner&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&lr=lang_en
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom