Mini me, “Do you have a little midget in you?”
Bounce, “No”.
Mini me, “Would you like to”?
Detax Canada
- Thread starter JLord
- Start date
Mini me, “Do you have a little midget in you?”
Bounce, “No”.
Mini me, “Would you like to”?
LightinDarkness
Master Poster
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2008
- Messages
- 2,583
Eldon's entire mythology revolves around the idea that
(1) Governments are secretly corporations
AND
(2) That being a corporation MUST MEAN that the policies set forth by it only applies to its own employees.
The problem is that this presupposition is, as has been pointed out by multiple times now, a myth. The reality is that:
(1) Governments are sovereign organizations that routinely and openly form corporations in order to more efficiently carry out their day-to-day operations
AND
(2) These subsidiary corporations exist in conjunction with the government as a sovereign entity whose laws apply to everyone whether they like it or not.
(1) Governments are secretly corporations
AND
(2) That being a corporation MUST MEAN that the policies set forth by it only applies to its own employees.
The problem is that this presupposition is, as has been pointed out by multiple times now, a myth. The reality is that:
(1) Governments are sovereign organizations that routinely and openly form corporations in order to more efficiently carry out their day-to-day operations
AND
(2) These subsidiary corporations exist in conjunction with the government as a sovereign entity whose laws apply to everyone whether they like it or not.
tsig
a carbon based life-form
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
- Messages
- 39,049
It's like we all created Jack Foster.
Our friend also believes that I am an Israeli agent using a computer program called megaphone to track him on the internet and intervene when he joins forums.
That's funny because I think in an earlier post he called me John. I was wondering if that was just what he calls people for some reason or if he thought he knew me from somewhere.
I changed your misnomer from 'Light in Darkness' to 'Light to Darkness', as you seem to have lost the meaning of your pseudonym, as seems evident by this post of yours.
Edited for rule 12 and quote boxes fixed. Do not change members' names in quote boxes for the purpose of insult. I'm leaving the above text since it is somewhat explanatory, but if "renaming" becomes a habit the penalties will escalate.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic Posted By: Tricky
I never suggested for one moment that there was anything secret about the corporate nature of Government. On the contrary, I have quoted court cases and law dictionary definitions to show that there is no secret to the fact that Governments are incorporated bodies. Ma Lord (OP) fails to see that 'evidence' by simple observation shows that all incorporated bodies are 'make believe ships at sea' by their enclosed structure, their use of maritime type of law (as was imposed upon England in 1297 with the incorporation of the English Crown into a body politic) , and the fact that the construct of the governing/administrative body is based directly on the administration of a ship at sea. The only ones who see this as a secret are those who are willing blind and will not see, and those that are willingly deaf and will not hear.
Some concentrate on the 'employee' thing, maybe not realizing that 'employee' means someone who has subjected himself to the sole loyalty and subjugation of another party to perform labour. To me, concentrating on that issue is a 'red herring'. I see the conversion of humankind into slave status is by way of deceit in the corporate Crown using the property right claim and ownership of human bodies and the creation of an intellectual property called the 'legal name', whereby, when the man becomes of the age of majority, he, being a mind existing within an earthen vessel, the adult human body, becomes the supreme commander of that vessel, even though it is claimed as being owned by the corporate Crown. However, the unauthorized use of that legal name (as found on a birth certificate) is a 'guilty as charged crime of theft by unauthorized use of Crown property' when the man uses it to 'identify himself'.
As recently as October 9th, a man who was attempting to help a friend in court in London, Ont. as a 'friend of the court' was removed from the courtroom by London Police when he refused to allow the judge to 'identify' him as 'Deric Hill'. He was first taken to the cell in the court house and chocked to near unconsciousness and beaten severely, and then taken to a police station where he was tasered several times and beaten and kicked until he would state that his last name was Hill. But, that is all legal when dealing with disobedient slaves. The Latin term for disobedient slave was 'homo sacer', where such activity by officers of Government could do that with impunity.
Who gave them such sovereignty? Who had the authority to give Government such authority. The Boston lawyer of 1870, Lysander Spooner, certainly could not find such authority for America. (GOOGLE: "NO TREASON" ) The British Monarchy has never had such authority, especially since the Magna Carta of 1225. (the 1215 version was voided by the Pope).
Just as there is General Motors Inc. They have subsidiary corporations - a few being Buick, Chevrolet, Oldsmobile, and others. So, what is your point?
They are all 'make-believe ships at sea' with the limited liability that is natural to ships at sea. if one is out of reach by those on the land, they are safe from attack - legal or physical.
However, what is happening now, with the advent of long range and highly accurate missiles, ships are no longer immune from physical attack, and the internet has provided the long range missile making the corporate thieving Governments no longer immune in their corporate strongholds performing all their unlawful acts against God's Children on planet Earth. Just spend some time watching even the controlled news, and watch them start exploding into smithereens, just as the UNITED STATES is now doing under the guiding hand of Barak Obama.
Last edited by a moderator:
blobru
Philosopher
- Joined
- May 29, 2007
- Messages
- 6,900
He conspires to with the Pope (and/or the Queen, the Mob, or the Rockefellers: depends on what hors d'oeuvres the Illuminati were serving at brunch).
Last edited:
Really, you just don't seem to get it. I don't normally report posts, but you agreed to this when you signed up at the JREF.
8. You may only post a Member's personal information if it is both publicly available and is relevant to the ongoing discussion.
8. You may only post a Member's personal information if it is both publicly available and is relevant to the ongoing discussion.
Inability to admit error is common against people with beliefs such as yours. It is called the Dunning-Kruger effect. Look it up; it may prove illuminating.
On this very thread, a timeline was provided that disproved any connection between Isis and Rome. You may have missed it.
Now this is clear. You cannot and will not understand, because your next line of commentary includes...
When you accused my brain of being tainted by the Canadian educational system and the Red Robed Priests of Isis therein, I reminded you (again) that I am not Canadian. This is still true. I am also not John or Jack Foster. I do not use a Mossad computer program to find your posts; rather the JREF sends me a note when this thread is updated. Just so you know.
catsmate
No longer the 1
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 34,767
I'll have a go
I cannot refute any part of your posts nor can I provide evidence to support my views so I'll dodge the question, accuse you of shilling for <insert group here>, imply you're a racist and otherwise attempt to deflect attention from my stupidity and inability to deal with reality.
LightinDarkness
Master Poster
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2008
- Messages
- 2,583
Eldon has been debunked ten ways by at least ten different people now, and he keeps repeating the same things.
I am beginning to think we might be dealing with someone who is either (1) trolling or (2) mentally ill. I thought it was (1), but given his delusions about being tracked by Vatican agents...well...if hes trolling that then hes keeping the story straight across several forums.
I do not attempt to debunk mentally ill people. Its simply not fair nor humane - if they are genuinely suffering as Eldon appears to be, no amount of evidence will convince them anyways.
I hope you get better Eldon. I say this sincerely and without malice: Please seek professional help. You can get better.
I am beginning to think we might be dealing with someone who is either (1) trolling or (2) mentally ill. I thought it was (1), but given his delusions about being tracked by Vatican agents...well...if hes trolling that then hes keeping the story straight across several forums.
I do not attempt to debunk mentally ill people. Its simply not fair nor humane - if they are genuinely suffering as Eldon appears to be, no amount of evidence will convince them anyways.
I hope you get better Eldon. I say this sincerely and without malice: Please seek professional help. You can get better.
Who are you to say anything I have posted on my website is 'in error'. Jack Foster, regardless the cowardly false name he uses, has NEVER proven 'such', in his diatribes against me. I thought there was a rule on this forum against trolls and intended defamation of character of posters.
Well, then you may be able to explain what the phallic symbol (oblisk) imported from Egypt, and standing in a circle representing a vagina is doing in St. Peter's Square, and is subject to the Pope's veneration each morning from his balcony? What does that have to do with Christianity? On the other hand, it has everything to do with the continued worship and veneration for Isis, Ra and El Shaddai, the prime false gods of Egypt.
OK, so you are just showing yourself as the troll that has been attempting (futilely, I might add) to drive people away from my website, by the use of defamation of character and assorted slander and liable. So, you found this thread, likely by invitation of the lawyer, to continue your sleazy attempts. But, it is failing miserably, as my website hits have continued to increase, and inquiries also continue to increase.
So, this forum thread was set up by whoever JLord is to defame www.detaxcanada.org. Sorry fellas.. You are wasting your time. My backer is bigger that yours.
catsmate
No longer the 1
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 34,767
I believe in his case it's mainly a defense mechanism against having to face reality and how badly he's screwed up his life with this rubbish.
Hans
Philosopher
- Joined
- May 10, 2007
- Messages
- 9,210
It is always sad to see someone so disconnected with reality that his whole life becomes distorted in trying to make people believe him.
Insanity which unfortunately is funny as hell to watch! Sad and unfortunately but still amusing kinda like a modern version of viewing the inmates at Bedlam.
Insanity which unfortunately is funny as hell to watch! Sad and unfortunately but still amusing kinda like a modern version of viewing the inmates at Bedlam.
Oh! Really! So, I have vastly overestimated your and other anti-Warman posters on this thread. Thought maybe you were Carleton brainwashed promoters of collectivism (My son attended Carleton U in the late 80s, and said that there were more Communists there than in Moscow), but, obviously, it was a mistake on my part to think that some may have been of reasonable intelligence, and some some moral fortitude allowing for some simple reasoning power. I apologize for that error.
Since nothing was ever really said about the basis of the website, www.detaxcanada.org, that was the subject of this thread - the filing of a $0,00 Tax Owing 'return of income' as per the CRA 'The T1 Income tax and Benefits package', then it is obvious that the real design of this thread was to 'KILL THE MESSENGER'. Sorry! Hasn't worked.
Just go to that webpage and down at the bottom is a hit counter available to the public. You will see that, whereas in years past, the normal daily hits were around 25. Notice the increase. Obviously, not all who go to that webpage are interested in fighting the battle against the extortion racket that is income tax, as many are dominated by fear. But, a look at the terms that people use to search GOOGLE tells a whole story.