Detax Canada

[twinstead]

I provide FACTS. You give your weak and totally 'dis-information' opinion.

How is pointing out the overwhelmingly common usage for a word or phrase, that you ignore in order to provide your own arbitrary meaning to, dis-information?

And how is the transparent thing you are attempting "facts"? You can't define words to suit your purposes. USAGE defines words. Anybody who studies the history of languages knows that the origin of words and phrases can go through multiple changes in the course of history. A word means what it means because the vast majority of people use it for that purpose. Over the course of time that meaning can actually change. Isn't etymology delightful?

so, you are purposefully either using the meaning of a word or phrase that has no connection with the common usage, or simply making stuff up as you go along.

Jesus, If I can see it, ANYBODY can.

 

[carlitos]

It is already devolving with big text, bold text, and ALL CAPS. The end is nigh.

 

[EldonG]

Thus, liber homo -- a man at which a judge should throw the book.

Nice try - mister dis-info.

From GOOGLE Latin to English translator:

Liber = Translations: free, child, book, offspring, independent, unrestricted

You see Section 20 of the Magna Carta above. Are you suggesting that 'liber homo', where it is obvious that 'homo' is the Latin term for 'man', that the phrase 'liber homo' meant: child man, book man, or offspring man?

Independent man, or unrestricted man would be appropriate.

 

[EldonG]

... do you have any actual evidence indicating the Vatican retains any control over any parts of the world besides its own city-state? Because without some type of framework in place to make decisions, pass those decisions on to subordinates, and some type of force to enforce the decisions with, the only thing that random comments from officials seven centuries ago proves is that people seven centuries ago were kind of arrogant.

Well, if you were truly interested, you would do some of your own research. Obviously, the vast majority of the posters on this thread obviously don't wish to believe my researched findings, so do your own.

You can try some of these websites by other researchers, unless you choose to 'debunk' everything that is on a website on the internet.

I cannot yet post full links, so you will have to improvise:

wikicompany.org/wiki/911:Vatican_%26_Jesuits

taroscopes.com/miscellanous-pages/weapons-additional.html

z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mind_II/index.php?showtopic=10&st=0

newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff329.htm

one-evil.org/acts_holocaust/acts_vatican_holocaust.htm

emperors-clothes.com/vatican/cpix.htm

 

[EldonG]

Why do you think Canada is an "imaginary" ship at sea. It's a real ship actually floating on the sea.

Whatever!

 

[EldonG]

Let me get your logic straight.

• There were some red robed priests of Isis who brought a religion to Rome.
• When they were ordered by Constantine to accept Christianity, they re-named the Savior of the new religion "Iesus," which really meant "Id est Sus," or "he is a pig." Ha ha, funny guys. Byzantium's own Beavis and Butthead.
• All the followers of this new religion didn't notice the nickname, falsely assuming it sounded like "Yeshua" or the Greek equivalent.

As for "slave control," perhaps you could share some evidence for this?


Would you like to present evidence for any of this?


At the risk of repeating myself, perhaps you could post evidence or examples of me "calling you names" and "making derogatory comments" about you?

Not that there is anything wrong with that.

If you choose to be 'deaf, dumb and blind', I'm afraid I cannot help you 'hear, understand or see. If, what I say bothers you, then, do your own research.

I just provide some source material for anyone who wishes to research to use as 'key words and phrases' for GOOGLE searches.

As with any good teacher, I can most effectively teach you the subject by giving you keys, and pointing you to sources where you do your own research and gaining of actual experience. Otherwise, if I, or any teacher tells you something, it just goes into your short term memory bank, and gains you nothing.

 

[EldonG]

Hey Eldon,

Jlord kindly pointed this out to you but you ignored it:

Here's a link for you so you can see for yourself:

http://canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/rsc-1985-c-b-2/latest/rsc-1985-c-b-2.html#NOTE_ISSUE__48572

Satisfied? Can we expect you to stop repeating the particular lie that Canadian dollars are promissory notes??

So??? The Bills of Exchange Act of Canada has not been otherwise modified, making promissory notes 'negotiable instruments' as per the Financial Administration Act of Canada.

The Bills of Exchange Act was enacted or revised in the early 1930s to allow 'settlement' of debt because there was no real asset value money to 'pay' a debt, thus preventing a creditor from sueing or confiscating property because they did not get an exchange of a real asset for an asset sold. So, if Parliament says that Canadian currency is no longer a bill of exchange, then that means that creditors are getting truly ripped off, and currency is purely a con game.

The revision just says that Canadian Currency is now pure Monopoly Money, and is a total fraud upon the Canadian people.

 

[EldonG]

How do people get so crazy?

Your question. You answer it.

Do not change another member's post without making it very clear what you have changed.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL

 

[EldonG]

I notice that EldonG has now stopped responding to my posts entirely. Instead preferring to debate the history of the Catholic church. It makes me think he has no answer to my points and would prefer to ignore the facts rather than try to support his position.

I have to wonder if this is a situation like the one described on the detax website where he would believe that the maxim of law "silence constitutes acquiescence" would apply?

What is the point of attempting to discuss such matters with a traitor and liar? All the evidence and proof in the world would not change your loyalty to your primary oath to the Lawyers Guild ( The BAR) of the City of London, and thus the Pontiff's Holy Roman Empire evil dictatoprship.

 

[carlitos]

If you choose to be 'deaf, dumb and blind', I'm afraid I cannot help you 'hear, understand or see. If, what I say bothers you, then, do your own research.

I just provide some source material for anyone who wishes to research to use as 'key words and phrases' for GOOGLE searches.

As with any good teacher, I can most effectively teach you the subject by giving you keys, and pointing you to sources where you do your own research and gaining of actual experience. Otherwise, if I, or any teacher tells you something, it just goes into your short term memory bank, and gains you nothing.

If you think that this refutes anything I posted, you are mistaken. What a bizarre response.

 

[EldonG]

I thought the Jews controlled the world?

All of this FTOL bravo sierra is just using "weasel wording" to try to get out of paying for stuff.

How can you 'pay for stuff' when there is no money to PAY for stuff?

Taxes are just the harvesting of the fruits of the labour of mankind, and what is taken is the phoney Monopoly money that you ignorantly accept as exchange for your labour. Do you not realize that 'life' = 'time', and 'labour = time'? Do the math - 'labour = life'!

When they confiscate your fruits of your labour, they are confiscating your life.
And, it may not be so bad IF income taxes actually paid for something, but all that is done with declared income tax is that it is deleted from existence.

The Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of NY, the voting shares owner of the Bank of Canada, said in a speech to the American Bar assn. in 1946, that the purpose of the income tax was: "As an instrument of fiscal policy to help stabilize the purchasing power of the dollar;" meaning to destroy $$ in circulation so as to enhance the value of newly created currency coming into existence by bank creation out of nothing. Like the pig with a bulldog mouth and a j-bird rectum - too much food going in will cause the pig to blow up (hyper-inflation).

That problem could be completely rectified without stealing mankinds labour/life by using asset value money/currency.

 

[EldonG]

If you think that this refutes anything I posted, you are mistaken. What a bizzare response.

The words of someone who is deaf, dumb and blind.

 

[carlitos]

deleted response to insult

 

[EldonG]

How is pointing out the overwhelmingly common usage for a word or phrase, that you ignore in order to provide your own arbitrary meaning to, dis-information?

'Common usage' is NOT 'legal usage'. That is why politicians and lawyers, usually one and the same, use 'code'. What does 'code' mean? Does it not mean 'secret or hidden meaning'? One of the major means of deception is the convincing of the people that legal/code words and phrases are used in a 'common usage' meaning. A good example of this is 'person'. That term is commonly used to mean a human creature, but in legal terms/code, it means a subservient member of a corporate body, or a crewmember on a ship, who is subservient to the supreme command of the captain of the ship. The term 'person' derives from the Greek/Roman role of an actor - a fictional role.

And how is the transparent thing you are attempting "facts"? You can't define words to suit your purposes. USAGE defines words. Anybody who studies the history of languages knows that the origin of words and phrases can go through multiple changes in the course of history. A word means what it means because the vast majority of people use it for that purpose. Over the course of time that meaning can actually change. Isn't etymology delightful?

This just shows me, and readers, that you have accepted the deceit, as stated above.

so, you are purposefully either using the meaning of a word or phrase that has no connection with the common usage, or simply making stuff up as you go along.

Guess you ignore authorities - oh well... Whatever.

Jesus, If I can see it, ANYBODY can.

Hmm.. you are calling on the PIG, the deity of the Vatican to actually see? You'd better make an appointment with the eye doctor.

 

[EldonG]

deleted response to insult

Well, guess you have no decent responses, so that is the only answer you have - duck!

It is amazing how a would be bully cowers when you confront him with truth.

 

[Horatius]

For sure! You mean to deceive.

I mean to deceive? Let's look at what you said:

Those who doubt my stating that all corporate bodies are 'make believe ships at sea' should be aware that 'to govern' means to 'steer, direct or administer a ship at sea. It has nothing to do with a land based world. A land based world has 'servants' to do what individuals are incapable of doing on their own.

I post the definition of the verb "to govern", that is, what the word means, and you post this:

From Online Etymology: Hint: etymonline.com/index.php?l=g&p=15

govern
c.1300, from O.Fr. governer "govern," from L. gubernare "to direct, rule, guide," originally "to steer," from Gk. kybernan "to steer or pilot a ship, direct" (the root of cybernetics). The -k- to -g- sound shift is perhaps via the medium of Etruscan. Related: Governed; governing.

So apparently, in your world, along with treaties that exist for all time and cannot be abrogated by any action of any party, we are also not allowed to ever alter the meaning of any word, even if we use a different pronunciation in a different language altogether.


So who is it who seeks to deceive here?

 

[332nd]

How can you 'pay for stuff' when there is no money to PAY for stuff?

Taxes are just the harvesting of the fruits of the labour of mankind, and what is taken is the phoney Monopoly money that you ignorantly accept as exchange for your labour. Do you not realize that 'life' = 'time', and 'labour = time'? Do the math - 'labour = life'!

When they confiscate your fruits of your labour, they are confiscating your life.
And, it may not be so bad IF income taxes actually paid for something, but all that is done with declared income tax is that it is deleted from existence.

The Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of NY, the voting shares owner of the Bank of Canada, said in a speech to the American Bar assn. in 1946, that the purpose of the income tax was: "As an instrument of fiscal policy to help stabilize the purchasing power of the dollar;" meaning to destroy $$ in circulation so as to enhance the value of newly created currency coming into existence by bank creation out of nothing. Like the pig with a bulldog mouth and a j-bird rectum - too much food going in will cause the pig to blow up (hyper-inflation).

That problem could be completely rectified without stealing mankinds labour/life by using asset value money/currency.

... No, taxes pages my salary at several points in my life.

 

[dudalb]

It wasn't 'Catholics' who made such a decision. It was the Red Robed Priesthood of Isis. That priesthood had brough a conglamorate religion with them to Rome, when they established Rome around 300 BC, called Mythraism. That priesthood has always used 'religion' to implement their true trinity - Force, Fear and False Hope. Mithraism had served them well for this purpose, but when Emperor Constantine (as Pontifex Maximus, ordered the Priesthood to accept Christianity, they had to do some major modifications the Christianity of the first 3 centuries AD they were saddled with, so as to serve their 'slave control' mechanisms as part of the corporate structure for their society that they continued from Egypt, through Babylon and on into Rome.

The Red Robed Priesthood has always been primarly 'priest/kings' where secular rule dominated their existence. Religion was, and always has been a tool to control the subject people under their control.

We can add religion in The Roman Empire to the growing list of topics that EldonG knows nothing about.
The Isis Cult and Mithraism had little in common,and in fact competed with each other for followers.
And it is sort of contradictory for somebody who talks so much about "Creator God" to knock religon like that.

 

[EldonG]

I mean to deceive? Let's look at what you said:

I post the definition of the verb "to govern", that is, what the word means, and you post this:

I did notice that you posted the deceptive definition meant for the stupid/ dumbed down peons. However, I posted the original and still quite adequate and meaningful definition of the term 'govern' as meaning to steer or pilot a ship (or to administer a make-believe ship called a body politic.

So apparently, in your world, along with treaties that exist for all time and cannot be abrogated by any action of any party, we are also not allowed to ever alter the meaning of any word, even if we use a different pronunciation in a different language altogether.

So who is it who seeks to deceive here?

You can alter all you wish, but when it comes to a man's rights being stolen by your contrived (common) usage, then one must stick to the original meaning. The 'mens rea' is the prime factor in trying to replace legal terminology with common usage, as lying and deceitful judges and lawyers are so often want to do.

 

[EldonG]

... No, taxes pages my salary at several points in my life.

Removed breach of Rule 12 and Rule 0

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL