• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Detax Canada

Of course the magic words work! When spoken to agents of the conspiracy, they successfully cut through the neuro-linquistic programming that has been used to brainwash them and tingle the pineal gland. It's like the old magic behind having two names, a true name and the name you're known by. This is how it works.

Also, Reptoids or some ****.

Well, the idea of 2 names is a deception that a lot of people have bought into - put out by the shills of the Vatican's system.

A child is 'given' names by the parents, who, in registering (offering up to the king) the newborn child 'identify themselves as being slaves owned by the corporate Crown (The corporate Crown has ruled GB since 1297, with the Monarch being just the CEO of the corporation, itself being a sub-corporation of the administrative corporation of the City of London, also called the Crown.
The City of London, n independent city /state within England is owned by the Pontiff of Rome. The Crown of the City is a sub-corporation of the corporate Holy Roman Empire, of which the pontiff of Rome is CEO.

A 'child, being without a mature and moral thinking mind, is thus property, as a 'ship or vessel under construction in a drydock. Thus, a child, as property, can have an identifying name. The family name is referential to the given names and is NOT a man's name.

The registry of the Child with the Crown gives up claim to the child, and it thus becomes a ward of the Crown. The parents become merely 'foster parents' to it. Thus, the powers of the Crown's Social Services, who can bypass due process of law in dealing with parent/children relations.

When the child reaches the age of majority, the vessel is launched upon the sea of life, and a supreme authority captain (cap = latin for head) comes on board. Thus, regardless who claims the physical (Crown or State claims all dead bodies) body, the captain, whilst at sea is supreme. This we refer to
free will'. For the sceptic, free will does not mean 'free to do anything to anyone' , as the negative Golden Rule governs all mankind - Do no harm.

Thus, as with a vessel, the only way another vessel can take control (lawfully) of another vessel is by the consent of the captain of the 'to be controlled' vessel.

The scheme is to have the free will man 'identify' himself as being one and the same as a name conconcocted by people within the corporate Crown where the family name has been converted into a primary or 'sur' name.
The 'all caps' spelling one sees often just means that the property (intellectual property of the Crown) has been pledged as chattel in the bankruptcy declared by all nations directly under the umbrella of the Holy Roman Empire. It does not create the strawman/legal name. The property right legal maxim, accessio cedit principali, is used to entrap the free vessel into being a slave vessel under tow.

In the USA, the corporate UNITED STATES, the administrating corporation of the Vatican owned city/state called DC or Washington, assumed the Constitution of the united States of America as its Articles of incorporation.
They instituted the 14th Amendment to allow the corporation to own slaves, deceptively called 'citizens'. The 13th Amendment gave the corporation the means to deprive citizens/freemen status slaves of their rights to due process of law, -convicted criminals allows to have involuntary servitude imposed upon them. A corporations are under maritime law, an accused crewmember/corporate member is guilty unless proven innocent by an officer of the vessel or corporation. Thus, the unauthorized use of the State owned name is theft, a felony. Guilty and convicted as charged.

So, getting to 'My name' versus the Crown's or State owned name, a mind is not a physical thing, and thus cannot have an 'identifying' name. All a mind of a free will adult man can have are words or terms that gain that mind's attention. This is called an 'appellation' - where 'appel' in French means 'call'.

Thus, in the normal logic of names, we, as adult men, male or female, can have no identifying name. Anyone who disputes this are free to 'identify' themself by a name, but, know that, as 'property' you are an owned creature.

The religious few chime in with: "well, we are God's property." No, Creator God recognizes our rights and privileges as 'captain of our vessel' - our free will. That is why we have choices in life - many of which are likely not pleasing to Creator God.
 
Um, what?


Looks like it's still there to me.

Queen Victoria, the Monarch whose reign brought us the BNA Act 1867 died in 1901. Death usually means the end to any duties that may be inscribed in any document pretaining to the deceased.

Section 2 of the BNA Act was rescinded by the British Statutes Reform Act of 1893. That section said:

2. The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

Without that Section 2, who or by what right would the Monarch of Great Britain be Monarch of Canada, regardless what other sections of the BNA Act may refer to 'the Queen or Her Majesty?
 
Queen Victoria, the Monarch whose reign brought us the BNA Act 1867 died in 1901. Death usually means the end to any duties that may be inscribed in any document pretaining to the deceased.

Section 2 of the BNA Act was rescinded by the British Statutes Reform Act of 1893. That section said:

2. The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

Without that Section 2, who or by what right would the Monarch of Great Britain be Monarch of Canada, regardless what other sections of the BNA Act may refer to 'the Queen or Her Majesty?

You may refer to me as Mayor of your Front Lawn. I'm still waiting for you to vacate the premises.
 
Now, did the SC rule that Canadian bills are "only promissory notes"? No. In a 5-4 split decision in which the Chief Justice dissented, the Court found that Canadian bills were legal tender but also promissory notes.

Does this say, or not say, that Canadian currency (bills) are prommisory notes?

Looks very much like it says they are - to me.
 
The same as is paying it now - nobody. Nothing is being 'paid for'. The whole fiat money thing is just one big CON game.

What does it take to have you realize that 10 Billion NOTHINGS is equal to 1 NOTHING.

You're ignoring the question. Let's assume that we all go back to the gold standard and we overthrown the conspiraators. Who, then, will pay for national defense, roads, and courts?
 
You may refer to me as Mayor of your Front Lawn. I'm still waiting for you to vacate the premises.

Explain please? I, nor anyone else reading here, have the foggiest notion as to what message you may be attempting to spew. What does this have to do with the theme of this thread?
 
Queen Victoria, the Monarch whose reign brought us the BNA Act 1867 died in 1901. Death usually means the end to any duties that may be inscribed in any document pretaining to the deceased.

Section 2 of the BNA Act was rescinded by the British Statutes Reform Act of 1893. That section said:

2. The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

Without that Section 2, who or by what right would the Monarch of Great Britain be Monarch of Canada, regardless what other sections of the BNA Act may refer to 'the Queen or Her Majesty?

"Whereas the Provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick have expressed their Desire to be federally united into One Dominion under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, with a Constitution similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom:"

http://canlii.org/en/ca/const/const1867.html
 
Explain please? I, nor anyone else reading here, have the foggiest notion as to what message you may be attempting to spew. What does this have to do with the theme of this thread?

I understand it, once again you have uttered a non-truth.
 
Explain please? I, nor anyone else reading here, have the foggiest notion as to what message you may be attempting to spew. What does this have to do with the theme of this thread?

Since you're claiming random stuff as true, so am I. Keep shaking your cane, old man. I'm still mayor of your front lawn.
 
Explain please? I, nor anyone else reading here, have the foggiest notion as to what message you may be attempting to spew. What does this have to do with the theme of this thread?

He's mocking your claim that everything belongs to the Pope because another long dead Pope said so.

It's absurd, but so is everything you have said on these forums.
 
Does this say, or not say, that Canadian currency (bills) are prommisory notes?
No. You don't read very well do you?

Looks very much like it says they are - to me.
Indeed. A lot of things look quite strange to you. We are getting that.

You also cited another case a while back as your authority for the proposition that the IRS is an agency of the IMF. Perhaps you can give a pinpoint reference from within the case? I conveniently attached it for you.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6275693#post6275693
 
You're ignoring the question. Let's assume that we all go back to the gold standard and we overthrown the conspiraators. Who, then, will pay for national defense, roads, and courts?

First off, Canada (and the USA) are exremely rich in natural resources. Why would a farmer have to resort to robbing a grocery store for milk when he had a field full of milk cows?

One 300 square mile in area mineral claim that I am aware of in British Columbia has more precious metal values making it richer than maybe 80% of the countries of the rest of the World. The Bakkan oil field of the Dakotas, Montana and Saskatchewan has far more oil than all of the Middle East. Same
goes for Alaska and likely the Yukon. Alberta has more oil that Saudi Arabia in the tar sands.

Secondly, if needed, a small new product sales tax would more than cover the Government needs in a proper society - one that is not harnessing a military to help the Vatican banksters steal the worlds oil, gas, and opium crops, as we naow are doing.
 
What? I offer you my true name and you scorn its value?

Hmmmph.

Well, if you have an 'identifying name' then you are naught but a 'plantation slave' fully subject to having the labour you possess harvested by the corporate Crow, and you can do damn all about it.

I am commonly called Eldon, but when called, I often answer to 'Dude', several derogatory names , Honey, Dear, Hey You,
and Meow. But, I have NO identifying name, because Motor Vehicles Registry have tried and tried to take a picture of my mind (the one who is punching the keyboard usin my resident body's fingers and eyes), but, so far, they have come up empty. And, it cannot be because my mind is empty, because I found my way to the Registry office.
 
Last edited:
Well, if you have an 'identifying name' then you are naught but a 'plantation slave' fully subject to having the labour you possess harvested by the corporate Crow, and you can do damn all about it.
My true name was given to me by Ogion, the wizard of Gont who held back the earthquake.
 
First off, Canada (and the USA) are exremely rich in natural resources. Why would a farmer have to resort to robbing a grocery store for milk when he had a field full of milk cows?

For those of us that are not farmers, this is not helpful.

Secondly, if needed, a small new product sales tax would more than cover the Government needs in a proper society - one that is not harnessing a military to help the Vatican banksters steal the worlds oil, gas, and opium crops, as we naow are doing.

... And what happens when someone else decides they want to steal OUR resources? Or wants to tell us what to do with our lives? Or decides they simply want more land? Or they decide we looked at them funny 200 years ago? History shows that if nothing else - people don't need all that much reason to try and kill each other. I'd rather have the military to guard against such things.
 
I am commonly called Eldon, but when called, I often answer to 'Dude', several derogatory names , Honey, Dear, Hey You,
and Meow. But, I have NO identifying name, because Motor Vehicles Registry have tried and tried to take a picture of my mind (the one who is punching the keyboard usin my resident body's fingers and eyes), but, so far, they have come up empty. And, it cannot be because my mind is empty, because I found my way to the Registry office.

 

Back
Top Bottom