I have a feeling that Baker might be Skippy's brother.![]()
I see the ad hominem logical fallacie is still popular tactic here.
I have a feeling that Baker might be Skippy's brother.![]()
I never said it was false or that Derren is a fraud
it does make you wonder how often they [stooges/actors] are used.
Since you brought up what was the disclaimer in the Trick or treat series and the Mind control series?
I didn't want be the one to kill the thread.
I see the ad hominem logical fallacie is still popular tactic here.
Since I brought it up? You're the one that brought up disclaimers by complaining about the lack of a disclaimer.
I havent brought the disclaimers you did so I'm asking what they consist of?
Episodes of Trick or Treat are not preceded
Here is a summary of Skippy's material from this thread:
Blah blah I'm a lock expert, blah blah blah, the camera doesn't show Derren shooting the gun blah blah blah.
I think that's about it.
Derren never says that. Some shows have a disclaimer, but others (such as Trick or Treat) don't. When a disclaimer is used, it simply states that no stooges or actors are used; it doesn't mention participants or anyone else specifically. If the person tricked is a celebrity, they're likely to act along with what's expected once they realize how the effect works, making them an instant stooge. A non-celebrity may well do the same, so as to make sure they do appear on TV. There are examples of both, where it's obvious that the person "tricked" does know what is really happening. When Derren played chess against various people simultaneously, some of those people had guessed in advance that Derren would remember moves played by others and then play those moves as his own! Those people weren't tricked; they just chose to be stooges rather than spoil the effect.Derren always says he doesn't use the participants as stooges or actors, meaning the ones that he tricks.
*snip* When Derren played chess against various people simultaneously, some of those people had guessed in advance that Derren would remember moves played by others and then play those moves as his own! Those people weren't tricked; they just chose to be stooges rather than spoil the effect.
Derren never says that. Some shows have a disclaimer, but others (such as Trick or Treat) don't. When a disclaimer is used, it simply states that no stooges or actors are used; it doesn't mention participants or anyone else specifically. If the person tricked is a celebrity, they're likely to act along with what's expected once they realize how the effect works, making them an instant stooge. A non-celebrity may well do the same, so as to make sure they do appear on TV. There are examples of both, where it's obvious that the person "tricked" does know what is really happening. When Derren played chess against various people simultaneously, some of those people had guessed in advance that Derren would remember moves played by others and then play those moves as his own! Those people weren't tricked; they just chose to be stooges rather than spoil the effect.
Of course you have proof of this?
A participant in the show spoke on television about it, and said what he had thought might happen. The show revealed minimal detail of the individual games (with good reason), so that they couldn't be compared directly. The burden of proof falls on the performer, i.e., Derren, not on me, as you should know.Of course you have proof of this?
If you added after the event the type of disclaimer Derren uses, you would be knowingly giving false information, since "made an instant stooge of someone" is incompatible with "no stooges were used".I were to make an instant stooge of someone I would in good faith and without feeling dishonest in the slightest advertise that I did not use stooges.
He's never specified the participants (or anyone else) in his televised shows, and Robbie Williams is a "celeb" who, through his experience of tattooing, couldn't fail to know that his arms were not being pierced by Derren's needles. Robbie's closing comments made it perfectly clear that he realized what was really done at the time, and that there was no risk to himself.Derren DOES say that in general, in interviews and such. He never uses the participants as stooges or actors, including the celebs.
That's a deliberate untruth; I never claimed to be a lock expert, just that I've possessed (and played about with) a combination lock similar in appearance to the one used in Derren's show. Normal use of that type of lock suffices to enable one to know that the proper procedure for opening the lock is a lot lengthier than the procedure used on the show. Also, mere use of Google suffices to find a quite cheap lock (albeit key-operated) that is designed to be alternatively unlockable by a wireless remote control device, whereas some locks offered to magicians as trick locks cost much, much more, despite being just modified commercially available (at low prices) standard combination locks.Here is a summary: Blah blah I'm a lock expert, . . .
It does matter, as it means the key event wasn't shown! It clearly couldn't have been a mere "mistake in filming"; the fact that remotely-operated cameras were being used implies these camera were carefully set up in advance, and the production staff must have been well aware that one of the cameras (which was used when chamber five turned out to be empty) would give a good view, whereas another would not show Derren's hand or the gun if Derren extended his arm. Also, the rapid changes of camera used must have been planned in advance, but weren't used for the slightly earlier showing of what happened in relation to chamber five.I already answered you that question. That it doesn't matter, and it was most likely a mistake in filming. It has nothing to do with the method itself. Remember that they used remote cameras.
If you added after the event the type of disclaimer Derren uses, you would be knowingly giving false information, since "made an instant stooge of someone" is incompatible with "no stooges were used".