BillC
Bazooka Joe
It's a frog diver, of course.98m is a long way - the pressure on that toad is huge. How does it do it without scuba?
It's a frog diver, of course.98m is a long way - the pressure on that toad is huge. How does it do it without scuba?
What's 98m deep in Loch Ness that would be of interest to a toad?
That's Jacques Crapauea, investigating zee mysteries of zee deep.Forget Nessie. We have an active underwater toad at 98 meters. WTF? Again, forget Nessie and focus on this amazing toad.
Tough beasties toads.
Uh... Uhm... OK.Nah. I never thought you thought this was a hoax.
You can't start out wrong before converting to French. The beginning statement must retain its full original character and bankrupt English grammar...
All your base are belong to us.
All my base are belong to you.
All my base are belong to them.
...and so on, for great justice.
Perhaps you are supposed to kiss the frog and it'll turn into Nessie?
Mister Toad, I presume,
Hopping out of the Loch Ness gloom
Into the midday sun.
What did you find there?
Did you stand awhile and stare?
Did you meet anyone?
"I've seen detritus galore,
I've seen fishes big and small,
I've still not found what I'm looking for."
What's 98m deep in Loch Ness that would be of interest to a toad?
Mister Toad, I presume,
Hopping out of the Loch Ness gloom
Into the midday sun.
What did you find there?
Did you stand awhile and stare?
Did you meet anyone?
"I've seen detritus galore,
I've seen fishes big and small,
I've still not found what I'm looking for."
I'd like to know more. The story says MIT was doing a side scan survey yet the image shown is not a side scan sonar image. What other instruments were involved in the survey?
The article also says the toad was "crawling" along the bottom. I'd like to know how long they observed it and what they saw. The toads I've seen don't crawl. I wonder if they have video.
Finally, note how the back legs are extended. Again, from the toads I've seen, that is a very unusual posture.
Fun stuff to speculate about.