Eos of the Eons
Mad Scientist
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2003
- Messages
- 13,749
The Don said:
*That* was my point, delusion is in the eye of the beholder
My friend was hardly shopping for a diagnosis, each time he got "sectioned" (detained under the mental health act) they just diagnosed him differently and pumped him full of a different set of psychotropic drugs.
I woudl argue that the reason main reason he was differently diagnosed each time had to do with the subjective nature of the diagnosis criteria and the scope that leaves for the psychiatrist to diagnose one of thir "pet" conditions.
Of course none of this helped particularly in treating his condition![]()
My son had to spend 6 months in a hospital (come home on weekends) before they would diagnose him with anything. This is because you have to present the symptoms for that long, and it's hard to fake or misdiagnose anything after you've been there six months.
It was a good thing, because all the guesses added up to one thing finally.
I'll be trying to read further up, but what was with your friend? I'll tell ya, that would never happen here. My mom is clearly schizophrenic and she can't be made to go to a hospital and she doesn't have to take any medication. If she hurts or kills somebody, well, then they might make her take meds.
Your friend, was he observed for a while before they tried meds? Then the meds can aid in diagnosis after that-to see if symptoms are helped or aggravated. Meds for kids with ADHD (ritalin) make my son psycho (thus ruling out that diagnosis on its own). Anti-psychotics turned him into a kid that could relate/reason, and stop smelling things that weren't there.
What I'm trying to say is, getting an accurate diagnosis takes time. If everyone is freaking out about whatever treatment they are trying out at the time, then it only makes it harder.
Believe it or not, most psychiatrists actually know what they are doing. They are also assisted by neurologists, and use whatever tools at their disposal (EEG, CAT scans, etc.)
I'm not sure if you just listened to your friend's version of the story, or actually know what the doctors were doing?
My mom would sure would tell you wild stories. I managed to get her in a hospital (they let her out after only a month, and now she's hating my guts) and she told me how horrible they were, how they were doing this and that to her. I of course was talking with the doctors and therapists, and got quite a completely different picture. I had to prove she was still a danger to herself and others after she was there for a month. Hmph, the panel listened to her lawyer instead, who argued her side (that she's perfectly normal and just wants to get back to her life). I'm still scratching my head on that one. I guess they just believed that she was a meek harmless person because she didn't talk in the room that time, her lawyer did all the talking. If they heard her talk though...
But that's how they handle things here. Everyone has the right to a lawyer and have the lawyer argue your point of view. It's only fair, right. Hmph. I'll tell you the drawbacks to this system.
So we have two extremes here. Your friend obviously got meds. My mom doesn't have to, no matter what, until she threatens to kill her dad again, and I can get that on tape somehow.
What's worse? One system of handling things over another. Well, I don't know the whole story on your end, so I can't judge it at all.