Deeper than primes

Status
Not open for further replies.
MosheKlein said:
Many Many and Many ! application it can have
because the language is one of the most important
quality of the Human race.
Click to expand...
Excellent. Surely there is one minor practical application that you can share with us? After all there are "Many Many and Many !".
 
MosheKlein said:
Organic Mathematics is like a real organism !
Click to expand...

So, as i mentioned earlier, it is compostable. Thanks for clarifying that.

MosheKlein said:
In my vision it have the shape of Klein Bottle.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8rifKlq5hc

From locality it have two size
From non locality it have only one size.
Click to expand...

Size? You probably mean surface, right?

However, care to gives us an example of how to represent a Klein bottle using OM? The formula for that, using standard math, can be found in this Wikipedia link.

Edit: However, it still has only one side. And if you talk about perception, then i guess you have it the wrong way round. If i would walk locally on the surface, it shows up as a single surface. But if i look at it non-locally from a distance, it _appears_ on a quick look to have two surfaces (inner and outer). You could also have referred to a Moebius-strip, basically the same, just that the strip has borders, which the bottle has not.

So you either went completely wrong with you local/non-local things (because there is only one surface), or you mixed up local and non-local.

MosheKlein said:
I can see it also as a positive demonstration to Goedel theorem.

So ,Many Many and Many ! application it can have
because the language is one of the most important
quality of the Human race.

Moshe
Click to expand...

Are you aware that mathematics _is_ already a well defined language? In fact, it is _the_ universal language of science. You assert that OM can do better, which automatically implies that standard math is flawed. But so far you have not given any practical example for that.

Instead, you rave around why people request something "for free" from something that has such a big "economical value".

You know, and let me say that very clear: You and doron sound like free-energy crackpots. Yes, you do. To 100%. Why? Simple: You say your stuff is superior, but can not explain how. You say that your stuff works, but you can not demonstrate it. You say your stuff will do so much good things to humanity, but you fail to deliver. If asked for an demonstration, you bail out and bring in financial interests of your own as a reason. That is indeed 100% free-energy crackpotish. The only difference is that you play this silly game with math, instead of energy. But the plot is the exact same.

Oh, did i mention that you also bring quantum mechanics, big names, etc. into your game in a lame attempt to make it look credible? Yes, 100% FE-crackpot.

So, again. Bring some (or even only one) example where OM does things better than regular math. Bring a sound comparison. Show us the flaw in standard math that your OM can solve. Otherwise everything you say is just meaningless blather.

Greetings,

Chris
 
Last edited:
Christian Klippel said:
So, as i mentioned earlier, it is compostable. Thanks for clarifying that.



Size? You probably mean surface, right?

However, care to gives us an example of how to represent a Klein bottle using OM? The formula for that, using standard math, can be found in this Wikipedia link.

Edit: However, it still has only one side. And if you talk about perception, then i guess you have it the wrong way round. If i would walk locally on the surface, it shows up as a single surface. But if i look at it non-locally from a distance, it _appears_ on a quick look to have two surfaces (inner and outer). You could also have referred to a Moebius-strip, basically the same, just that the strip has borders, which the bottle has not.

So you either went completely wrong with you local/non-local things (because there is only one surface), or you mixed up local and non-local.



Are you aware that mathematics _is_ already a well defined language? In fact, it is _the_ universal language of science. You assert that OM can do better, which automatically implies that standard math is flawed. But so far you have not given any practical example for that.

Instead, you rave around why people request something "for free" from something that has such a big "economical value".

You know, and let me say that very clear: You and doron sound like free-energy crackpots. Yes, you do. To 100%. Why? Simple: You say your stuff is superior, but can not explain how. You say that your stuff works, but you can not demonstrate it. You say your stuff will do so much good things to humanity, but you fail to deliver. If asked for an demonstration, you bail out and bring in financial interests of your own as a reason. That is indeed 100% free-energy crackpotish. The only difference is that you play this silly game with math, instead of energy. But the plot is the exact same.

Oh, did i mention that you also bring quantum mechanics, big names, etc. into your game in a lame attempt to make it look credible? Yes, 100% FE-crackpot.

So, again. Bring some (or even only one) example where OM does things better than regular math. Bring a sound comparison. Show us the flaw in standard math that your OM can solve. Otherwise everything you say is just meaningless blather.

Greetings,

Chris
Click to expand...

I am sorry but you are wrong !
klein bottle have two sizes from locality point of view
and only one size from the global view


ok - I give up

try to think about the Economy of the world
as a living organisim:con2:
 
catbasket said:
Excellent. Surely there is one minor practical application that you can share with us? After all there are "Many Many and Many !".
Click to expand...

ok . take a point and a line ( not made from points)
and go to play on that with the childrens
in the near kindergarden:con2:
 
realpaladin said:
So, let's say I want to buy an application? What would I buy?
Click to expand...

Good !

Well ,you receive already the organic number 2 for free

(ab,ab);(ab,a);(ab,b);(a,a);(b,b);(a,b)

until today you have only (a,b)

for much more advance application how you are going to pay us ?

Best
Moshe
:cool:
 
MosheKlein said:
Good !

Well ,you receive already the organic number 2 for free

(ab,ab);(ab,a);(ab,b);(a,a);(b,b);(a,b)

until today you have only (a,b)

for much more advance application how you are going to pay us ?

Best
Moshe
:cool:
Click to expand...

I want to say: I guess the humane thing to do would be 'to pay the bill until therapy restores you to full mental health', but alas I can not.

So I say, you given nothing of worth and I still have given you my time, so you owe me!
 
realpaladin said:
I want to say: I guess the humane thing to do would be 'to pay the bill until therapy restores you to full mental health', but alas I can not.

So I say, you given nothing of worth and I still have given you my time, so you owe me!
Click to expand...

I am really sorry but I can't take any responsibility about your time.
Do you know something about the Turing machine ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom