Deeper than primes

Status
Not open for further replies.
doronshadmi said:
No you don't, it is based on direct perception, no definition
Click to expand...

Curious notion, there, doronshadmi. So you have now reached the point where things can just be perceived without definition. That certainly plays to your strength (a complete lack of ability to define anything).

How does this work? You just make up a new term, like contrafiscal say, and then through the power of perception alone give it meaning? Remarkable.

...no bla bla bla...
Click to expand...

Oh! I know this one. Captain Kirk to Jahn's friend in the episode, Miri.

...
No, it is an invariant fact that any higher dim is non-local w.r.t to any lower dim, and any lower dim is local w.r.t to any higher dim.
Click to expand...

Well, no, it is not an invariant fact. It is merely a statement by you as to how you'd like Mathematics to work. Be that as it may, the whole reason I mentioned this infinite hierarchy of dimensions and non-localities is because you rejected the notion in the past. You have changed positions.
 
The Man said:
Why, I quoted your post in its entirety. That you chose to edit that post without noting that edit is simply your demonstrative problem. You have already been well informed that I simply will not enable such juvenile behavior on your part.
Click to expand...

No problem, stay in your "dragged point" fantasy.
 
Last edited:
jsfisher said:
Curious notion, there, doronshadmi. So you have now reached the point where things can just be perceived without definition. That certainly plays to your strength (a complete lack of ability to define anything).

How does this work? You just make up a new term, like contrafiscal say, and then through the power of perception alone give it meaning? Remarkable.



Oh! I know this one. Captain Kirk to Jahn's friend in the episode, Miri.



Well, no, it is not an invariant fact. It is merely a statement by you as to how you'd like Mathematics to work. Be that as it may, the whole reason I mentioned this infinite hierarchy of dimensions and non-localities is because you rejected the notion in the past. You have changed positions.
Click to expand...

Enjoy your ignorence jsfisher, there is nothing to add in your case.

You will never get:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4870291&postcount=4293

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4870382&postcount=4298

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4870384&postcount=4299


The Man is wating to you with his "dragged point" fantasy.
 
Last edited:
jsfisher said:
Your response ignores the contrafiscal nature of word\meaning interaction.
Click to expand...
Your response ignores the objective form of Non-locality\Locality intercaction ( http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4870638&postcount=4306 ) that stands at the basis of any bla bla bla ... subjective agreement between any community of people.


Again,

If you insist to define location, then form a direct perception it will observed like this:

bla bla bla bla bla ..., where bla bla bla bla bla ... is the local aspect of this definition and ____________ is the non-local aspect of this definition.

Aactually both bla bla bla bla bla ... and ____________ are two aspects of your Non-locality\Locality realm, where bla bla bla bla bla ... is a string of your thoughts and ___________ is your memory that gathers them into a one notion.

And again,

bla bla bla bla ... refers to the fundamental form of any possible bla bla bla bla ..., by using direct perception.

This fundamental form is too simple for subjective manipolations, and this is exactly why it is really form(mal) (not like the bla bla bla ... subjective agreements between some community of people).
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
Your response ignores the objective form of Non-locality\Locality intercaction ( http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4870638&postcount=4306 ) that stands at the basis of any bla bla bla ... subjective agreement between any community of people.


Again,

If you insist to define location, then form a direct perception it will observed like this:

bla bla bla bla bla ..., where bla bla bla bla bla ... is the local aspect of this definition and ____________ is the non-local aspect of this definition.

Aactually both bla bla bla bla bla ... and ____________ are two aspects of your Non-locality\Locality realm, where bla bla bla bla bla ... is a string of your thoughts and ___________ is your memory that gathers them into a one notion.
Click to expand...


Remarkable.

Any chance of an example of OM yet?
 
zooterkin said:
Remarkable.

Any chance of an example of OM yet?
Click to expand...

Yes, here it is:

One of the first disciplines that can use direct perception as a fruitful method is Quantum Mechanics, because Non-locality, Locality and Observation are used as main principles of this science. In that case n-Uncertainty x n-Redundancy tree can be found as a very useful tool.
 
Mosheklein,

Do you agree that bla bla bla bla is a fundamental part of the definition of location?

Please don't forget about my question on the union of the members of a set, either. Thanks.
 
doronshadmi said:
Yes, here it is:

One of the first disciplines that can use direct perception as a fruitful method is Quantum Mechanics, because Non-locality, Locality and Observation are used as main principles of this science. In that case n-Uncertainty x n-Redundancy tree can be found as a very useful tool.
Click to expand...

That's not an example. It's just another of your assertions.
 
jsfisher said:
Mosheklein,

Do you agree that bla bla bla bla is a fundamental part of the definition of location?

Please don't forget about my question on the union of the members of a set, either. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Even you question is wrong.

bla bla bla bla bla ... is a fundamental form of Non-locality(__________)\Locality(bla bla bla bla bla ...) associations that is based on direct perception, and direct perception does not need any agreement in order to immediately be understood.

Organic Mathematics' reasoning is not based on any subjective agreement as Standard Math is.
 
doronshadmi said:
Yes, here it is:

One of the first disciplines that can use direct perception as a fruitful method is Quantum Mechanics, because Non-locality, Locality and Observation are used as main principles of this science. In that case n-Uncertainty x n-Redundancy tree can be found as a very useful tool.
Click to expand...

Ok, so go ahead. Please give a worked example of just that.
 
doronshadmi said:
Even you question is wrong.
Click to expand...

Hmm, let's see:

doronshadmi said:
If you insist to define location, then form a direct perception it will observed like this:

bla bla bla bla bla ..., where bla bla bla bla bla ... is the local aspect of this definition and ____________ is the non-local aspect of this definition.
Click to expand...

Ok, this definition refers to the definition of location. Bla bla bla bla bla is the local aspect of this definition.

That would make bla bla bla a fundamental part of the definition of location. That would make my question correct, and you, doronshadmi, are again wrong.
 
jsfisher said:
Hmm, let's see:
Click to expand...

Hmm, let's see:

Oppss ... you have missed the Non-locality(__________)\Locality(bla bla bla bla bla ...) form that is understood by direct perception.

Again and agins all you get is the bla bla bla bla bla ... aspect and miss the memory aspect _________ of the direct perception form.
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
Hmm, let's see:

Oppss ... you have missed the Non-locality(__________)\Locality(bla bla bla bla bla ...) form that is understood by direct perception.

Again and agins all you get is the bla bla bla bla bla ... aspect and miss the memory aspect _________ of the direct perception form.
Click to expand...

Doron, you really, really need to work on that reading comprehension stuff. I missed nothing in what you wrote, but you completely ignored my use of the word, part.
 
jsfisher said:
Doron, you really, really need to work on that reading comprehension stuff. I missed nothing in what you wrote, but you completely ignored my use of the word, part.
Click to expand...

Ho yes you have missed your own memory\ bla bla ... fundamental form, that can be understood only by direct perception that does not need any bla bla ... agreement (not even between you and yourself) in order to immediately be understood.

You really need to work on your direct perception skills.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom