Deeper than primes

Status
Not open for further replies.
A realm where the measured and the measurer are interacted.

Who asks the questions?

Who is that whishes to know the "interacted" definition (or any other definition)?

Very bad netiquette there doronshadmi. Your original post was
How asks the questions?
EDIT: Now you've changed it a third time.


Edit2: changed it a fourth time
Why couldn't you just post another message?

Anyways, I want to know. Paranoid? You keep using unique definitions of words, like domain.
 
Last edited:
Since you want to play little games.

Your mom has an apple. She wants to know the weight of the apple. She places the apple on the scale. When she places the apple (the measured object) on the scale, it will give her a measurement. Who is the measurer?
 
Who is I?

Really. Are you that dense? Do you speak/type English? It's a pronoun.

From wikipedia I_(pronoun)WP
I (pronounced /aɪ/) is the first-person, singular personal pronoun (subject case) in Modern English. It is used to refer to one's self and is usually capitalized, although other pronouns, like he or she are not capitalized.

Edit: In the statement "I ask", I refers to Little 10 Toes.

Edit2: Google Translate gives me the Hebrew translation of I to be אני and/or אנוכי (Hebrew text shown)
 
Last edited:
Really. Are you that dense? Do you speak/type English? It's a pronoun.

From wikipedia I_(pronoun)WP
I (pronounced /aɪ/) is the first-person, singular personal pronoun (subject case) in Modern English. It is used to refer to one's self and is usually capitalized, although other pronouns, like he or she are not capitalized.

Edit: In the statement "I ask", I refers to Little 10 Toes.

Edit2: Google Translate gives me the Hebrew translation of I to be אני and/or אנוכי (Hebrew text shown)
I told you, so. Just step into the circumference line that makes up the witches circle and you get answers from Doron that your shopping bag is too small to hold. A couple of scrolls down the thread, and I might learn some new ideas in interior decorating.

The hand that rocks the cradle.
Who is the cradler?


You must persevere . . .
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by doronshadmi
Who is I?

Really. Are you that dense? Do you speak/type English? It's a pronoun.

Doron asked "Who is I?" not "What is I?"

Edit2: Google Translate gives me the Hebrew translation of I to be אני and/or אנוכי (Hebrew text shown)

God kicked himself in His Divine Butt by doing the Tower of Babel tongue discombobulation. As a consequence, the Bible had to be translated from one language to another and again and again to the effect of God not getting any of His Divine Ideas across -- lost in translation.
 
Originally Posted by Little 10 Toes
Your reply does not parse into English.


LOL. The influence of mischievous demon Ekklund felt right there. Came into existence in the early Bronze Age period, but it's not that difficult to get rid of. Just eat 6 oz of cherry yogurt right before sunrise. Then throw the spoon on the floor while repeating three times "depart!" But you have to say it in Ogam, not in English.
 
LOL. The influence of mischievous demon Ekklund felt right there. Came into existence in the early Bronze Age period, but it's not that difficult to get rid of. Just eat 6 oz of cherry yogurt right before sunrise. Then throw the spoon on the floor while repeating three times "depart!" But you have to say it in Ogam, not in English.

:D

Demonic influences would be one explanation why Doron's foot seems to be almost permanently wedged metaphorically in his mouth. He does seem to have a propensity for introducing more errors when trying to make a correction.

(Not sure how you can say something in OghamWP, though, as it's an alphabet, not a language.)
 
(Not sure how you can say something in OghamWP, though, as it's an alphabet, not a language.)

That's the way mischievous demon Ekklund protect its presence: you've finally found the ancient text that instructs you how to get rid of Ekklund, but you can't read it aloud, coz Ogam is not a language, just an alphabet. But...

The etymology of the word ogam or ogham remains unclear. One possible origin is from the Irish og-úaim — 'point-seam', referring to the seam made by the point of a sharp weapon.

Doron can simply start explaining to Ekklund the concept of zero-dimensional point w.r.t. seam and then localize the disoriented Ekklund into the realm of unmanifested by poking the demon with the framework of OM:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6251481#post6251481
 
Last edited:
He does seem to have a propensity for introducing more errors when trying to make a correction.
Nonsense. You don't use the point as a co-ordinate, the co-ordinates tell you where the point is.
By dragging the point, you are defining, for example, a line, which is 1-dimensional.
This reasoning has infinitely many errors.

The right reasoning is this:

A point is an existing dimensional space that has 0 degrees of freedom (no coordinates are related to points).

A line is an existing dimensional space that has 1 degrees of freedom (singletons of ordinates are related to points).

A plan is an existing dimensional space that has 2 degrees of freedom (pairs of coordinates are related to points).

A sphere is an existing dimensional space that has 3 degrees of freedom (triples of coordinates are related to points).

Etc... ad infinituum.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom