Deeper than primes - Continuation

[dafydd]

 

[doronshadmi]

Let's observe the following analogy:

NOthing is weaker than any tool that is used to measure it.

YESthing is stronger than any tool that is used to measure it.

Unity (thing) is the source of NO,SOME,EVERY,YES ploychotomy.

 

[dafydd]

Let's observe the following analogy:

[qimg]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7043/6840987626_c9c426828a_z.jpg[/qimg]

NOthing is weaker than any tool that is used to measure it.

YESthing is stronger than any tool that is used to measure it.

Unity (thing) is the source of NO,SOME,EVERY,YES ploychotomy.

Priceless gibberish. Now it's punshhh's turn. I would be interested in his opinion of those deep words of wisdom.

 

[doronshadmi]

The power of the continuum is the signature of YESthing in the universe of spaces.

Discreetness is the signature of YESthing in the universe of spaces.

As a result no amount of lower spaces or sub-spaces (where sub-spaces are mixture of lower spaces and higher space) completely cover a given higher space.

The current mathematical and scientific awareness is closed under the collection of lower\higher spaces.

 

[zooterkin]

Let's observe the following analogy:

[qimg]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7043/6840987626_c9c426828a_z.jpg[/qimg]

NOthing is weaker than any tool that is used to measure it.

YESthing is stronger than any tool that is used to measure it.

Unity (thing) is the source of NO,SOME,EVERY,YES ploychotomy.

Now you have a shaving mirror, perhaps you can learn to use Occam's razor.

 

[dafydd]

Doron is using Occam's hair restorer.

 

[doronshadmi]

Past ==> Future Time is the serial awareness of the inability of lower spaces or sub-spaces (where sub-spaces are mixture of lower spaces and higher space) to completely cover a given higher space.

Present Time is the parallel awareness of the inability of polytchotomy to be Unity.

Time and space, whether it is serial or parallel, are restricted to polytchotomy, where Unity (thing) is the source beyond restriction.

 

[doronshadmi]

Now you have a shaving mirror, perhaps you can learn to use Occam's razor.

Now you are restricted to an analogy.

 

[dafydd]

Past ==> Future Time is the serial awareness of the inability of lower spaces or sub-spaces (where sub-spaces are mixture of lower spaces and higher space) to completely cover a given higher space.

Present Time is the parallel awareness of the inability of polytchotomy to be Unity.

Time and space, whether it is serial or parallel, are restricted to polytchotomy, where Unity (thing) is the source beyond restriction.

Gibberish. Not even wrong.

 

[doronshadmi]

Gibberish. Not even wrong.

dafydd's awareness can't comprehend

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8115426&postcount=842

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8118378&postcount=844

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8118497&postcount=847

not even at the level of the analogy.

So his\her reply has no impact on the considered subject beyond [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/234094f620a22c9935.gif[/qimg] .

 

[dafydd]

dafydd's awareness can't comprehend

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8115426&postcount=842

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8118378&postcount=844

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8118497&postcount=847

not even at the level of the analogy.

So his\her reply has no impact on the considered subject beyond [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/234094f620a22c9935.gif[/qimg] .

You know bugger all about my awareness. I am aware that you know nothing about mathematics. Why did you link to gibberish that I have already seen?

 

[doronshadmi]

I am aware that you know nothing about mathematics.

You are not in any position to claim such an argument exactly because you get these links as gibberish (you get Mathematics only under the restrictions of Polychotomy).


B.t.w , there is a mistake in http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8118378&postcount=844 , the second row has to be:

"Discreetness is the signature of NOthing in the universe of spaces."

So the right one is:

The power of the continuum is the signature of YESthing in the universe of spaces.

Discreetness is the signature of NOthing in the universe of spaces.

As a result no amount of lower spaces or sub-spaces (where sub-spaces are mixture of lower spaces and higher space) completely cover a given higher space.

The current mathematical and scientific awareness is closed under the collection of lower\higher spaces.

 

[doronshadmi]

You know bugger all about my awareness.

Only what YOU know about awareness matters, and according to your replies, YOU are actually doing nothing in order to know it.

 

[joseph8th]

Anyone on this thread ever encounter "The Laws of Form" by G. Spencer-Brown? Some of what doronshadmi's rambling on about seems similar to GSB's later ramblings. Unlike this clown, though, the primary arithmetic of LoF (which is really just a different notation for regular Boolean algebra), and some derivative formal systems, actually led to some interesting mathematics.

 

[doronshadmi]

Now it's punshhh's turn.

No one here is a puppet in your show.

 

[keyfeatures]

Anyone on this thread ever encounter "The Laws of Form" by G. Spencer-Brown? Some of what doronshadmi's rambling on about seems similar to GSB's later ramblings. Unlike this clown, though, the primary arithmetic of LoF (which is really just a different notation for regular Boolean algebra), and some derivative formal systems, actually led to some interesting mathematics.

Thanks. Great link.

 

[doronshadmi]

Anyone on this thread ever encounter "The Laws of Form" by G. Spencer-Brown? Some of what doronshadmi's rambling on about seems similar to GSB's later ramblings. Unlike this clown, though, the primary arithmetic of LoF (which is really just a different notation for regular Boolean algebra), and some derivative formal systems, actually led to some interesting mathematics.

G. Spencer-Brown and me do not exclude Distinction as a fundamental property of the mathematical science.

Organic Mathematics is irreducible into Boolean algebra exactly because Uncertainty and Redundancy are taken as inseparable properties of Distinction.

B.T.W being a clown is a very fine art, unlike being a fool, narrow minded or ignorant.

 

[realpaladin]

I am waiting for content, but we are currently stuck t form....

 

[jsfisher]

I am waiting for content, but we are currently stuck t form....

You must be patient. Doron has spent only 25 years of his life grappling with all of this. You cannot honestly expect him to have fundamental content this early in the process, now can you?

 

[doronshadmi]

I am waiting for content, but we are currently stuck t form....

No awareness can get actual content only at the level of thoughts, which is naturally changeable, subjective and closed under polychotomy.

In order to get actual content (Unity awareness), awareness has to be also aware of its calm non-personal objective aspect.

Only by directly aware of YESthing\NOthing as the infinite signatures of "host"(continuum\objective\non-personal)\"hosted"(discreetness\subjective\personal) (abstract or physical) spaces, awareness can be aware of itself as Unity and as the source of polychotomy (whether it is serial and\or parallel).

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8115426&postcount=842 analogy can help to do the actual practice in order to achieve Unity awareness, and your awareness, realpaladin, is naturally waiting for content, which can't be achieved, as long as your awareness is trapped only at the level of thoughts ("hosted"(discreetness\subjective\personal) (abstract or physical) spaces).