Deeper than primes - Continuation

[The Man]

It is not amazing at all how context-dependent-only skill(ers) (whether they get a given realm by verbal_symbolic-only skills or visual_spatial-only skills) can't get that the "host" (the atomic state) of a given mathematical or physical dimensional space is defined but not made of its "hosted" expressions, exactly as a 1-dimensional space is defined as non-local w.r.t all possible curvatures, but it is not made of these curvatures, exactly because they are localities w.r.t it (the 1-dimensional space is at-once at all possible curvatures (it is a non-local atomic state) where no possible curvature is at-once at all possible curvatures (it is a local atomic state).

Amazing!! So a singular possible curvature is not all possible curvatures (are there impossible curvatures?). Once again you simply belabor the trivial.

ETA:

Oh again for your edification try (though I've mentioned it before) Non-Euclidian Geometry. While in Euclidian geometry the curvature of a line is intrinsically an aspect of that line in Non-Euclidian Geometry it need not be (it can be an aspect of the space that line is imbedded within). Consider a straight line on the surface of a sphere. Please learn something Doron.

 

[The Man]

Finer than all thoughts is not itself a thought, exactly as silence is not itself a noise.

Exactly as one's attention is naturally aware of more and more excited levels of mental activity (no matter what meaning is given to it), one's attention is naturally aware of more and more calmer levels of mental activity (no matter what meaning is given to it).

At the calmest awareness one naturally transcends any mantel activity (any thoughts’ process) and actually aware of the source of space\time, which transcends space\time, where this awareness is naturally free of any mental activity (any thoughts’ process).

By actually use one's natural abilities to be aware of the space\time source without losing it during mental activity (during thoughts’ process), one's awareness is developed into Unity awareness, which enables to act in real harmony w.r.t other space\time expressions.

For example, please look at http://www.tm.org/blog/maharishi/transcendental-meditation-mantra/




One naturally gets space/time as all there is, as long as one does not actually transcendent it (there is no evidence of anything beyond space/time from space/time standpoint).

Awareness is a mental activity, Doron. We are all well aware of your fantasy of being aware without any mental activity. Get some better fantasies Doron.

 

[The Man]

Double-stupid me! The glorious moment hasn't arrived yet, coz Doronetics draws inspiration from elsewhere:

Well he would certainly like to ascribe it as such, "non-local" to be inexact.

In other words, the practice (of Doronetics) involves thinking of many words - words devoid of any meaning.

Your direct perception is showing through epix.

 

[The Man]

Verbal_symbolic-only skill(ers) can't transcendent the thinking process exactly because they are captured by meanings, where meanings are given only at the level of thoughts process.

The practice TM involves awareness beyond thoughts' process meaning.

So once agian your assertions deliberately have no meaning, we already know that Doron.

 

[The Man]

By Unity awareness, consciousness in varying degrees is actually many expressed levels of a one realm.

For example, verbal_symbolic-only skill(ers) do not understand that thoughts and their related meanings are simply finer levels of consciousness, of the spoken.


The spoken level is realty aware of Unity only if silence is known during the spoken.

Ah, so a deaf mute can't think! A man I work with would dispute that vehemently though non-verbally.

Only by Unity awareness the spoken level fulfills its real meaning, where real meaning is archived only if it is an organ of a one unified framework, such that meanings are mutually developed (contradiction is naturally avoided among organs of a one unified realm).

The meanings of words are mutually developed, any lexicographer will explain this to you or you can just open a dictionary, it is full of mutually developed visually spatial symbols with verbal meanings. Personal meanings, as in your case, lack the ability to communicate any meaning. Though given your previous post that is apparently your intent.

 

[The Man]

Actually contradiction is the signature of the failure of the spoken level to be expressed without loosing the awareness of silence during the spoken expressions (verbal_symbolic-only skill(ers) fulfill their limited skills by not get http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7763358&postcount=172).

(B.T.W the curvature at the red point is infinite, simply because by using Curvature as the essential concept, any given point has an infinite curvature)

Nope, we have been over this before, a contradiction is simply a proposition that always evaluates to FALSE regardless of the truth values of its elements , like "belongs to AND does not belong to".

 

[The Man]

Let's clarify the universality of Cross-contexts AND Context-dependent framework.

Oh, by all means, please, let's

Some examples:

The expression "2 = 1+1" holds exactly because 2 is Cross-contexts w.r.t each 1, where each 1 is Context-dependent w.r.t 2, or in other words, "2 = 1+1" is Cross-contexts AND Context-dependent framework.

Again what other context other than numerical values are you using your "2" in? Without any additional context once again nothing crosses any context in your " Cross-contexts".

The expression "0 = 1-1" holds exactly because 0 is Cross-contexts w.r.t 1 or -1, where 1 or -1 are Context-dependent w.r.t 0, or in other words, "0 = 1-1" is Cross-contexts AND Context-dependent framework.

Once again you cross no other contexts with your purported " Cross-contexts". Now you are simply confusing, deliberately, different numerical values with different contexts. Please at least learn the meaning of context.

Please pay attention that being Cross-contexts is defined as the common state among several things, such that the sum of several things is first of all the common state among them.

Please pay attention to the mutually developed meaning of the English word 'context'.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/context

By following Cross-contexts AND Context-dependent framework, 1-dimesional space as the sum of all possible curvatures along it, is Cross-contexts w.r.t all possible curvatures along it, where each possible curvature is Context-dependent w.r.t the 1-dimesional space.

So is the case of the concept of Dimensional space w.r.t the particular possible dimensional spaces, it is Cross-contexts w.r.t them exactly because no particular dimensional space is the common property of that concept.

So is the case of the concept of Set w.r.t the particular possible sets, it is Cross-contexts w.r.t them exactly because no particular set is the common property of that concept.

In other words, Cross-contexts AND Context-dependent is the universal framework of all possible frameworks.

By Cross-contexts “the top” of given Context-dependent boxes “is open”, which enables to gather them as a one comprehensive framework.

Nope, as already noted just making up your own meanings for words makes you unable to communicate, stop being so lazy and learn what the words mean or come up with and define your own. Stop just stealing words for your own personal ill (if at all) defined meanings. As a liar and a thief for just your own personal goals makes your claims of any ethical system simply solipsistic.

 

[doronshadmi]

Considering a 1-dimensional space on the surface of a sphere, demonstrates that 1-dimensional space and all curvature's degree of 1 and 2 dimensional spqaces, are both context-dependent aspects of the 2-dimensional space, which is the "host" Cross-context w.r.t all dimensional spaces < 2-dimensional space and all possible curvature's degrees that are related to all dimensional spaces <= 2-dimensional space.

 

[doronshadmi]

We are all aware of verbal_symbolic-only skill(ers) to get only the active aspect of awareness, but not its calm state, which is the natural source of any possible activity, exactly as transparency is the natural source that enables each color its fool expression.

 

[doronshadmi]

Verbal_symbolic only skill(ers) are unable to get that deaf persons can think and also be aware of the calm level of awaeness even if thay can't hear the spoken level of awarness.

Verbal_symbolic only skill(ers) can't get that the meaning of words fulfilled only by being aware of their silent source, exactly as transparency is the natural source that enables each color its fool expression.

They do no understand that Lexicography or Dictionary are fulfilled only by being aware of the silent source of all possible expressions.

 

[doronshadmi]

Again, contradiction is the mutual destruction of expressions, because of the lack of harmony among them, where harmony is actually achieved by being aware of their common calm source during their mutual expression.

 

[doronshadmi]

The universality of Y shape (Cross-contexts AND Context dependent one framework) is not known by the limitation's awareness of verbal_symbolic-only or visual_spatial-only skill(ers), or by any awareness that is based on dichtomy between these skills (Unity awareness is not fulfilled).

 

[epix]

The expression "2 = 1+1" holds exactly because 2 is Cross-contexts w.r.t each 1, where each 1 is Context-dependent w.r.t 2, or in other words, "2 = 1+1" is Cross-contexts AND Context-dependent framework.

Since + is the Greek cross, the writer's Unconscius has made an attempt to communicate with us through a linear scattergram where the true-valued statement implies, "It's all (math) greek to me."

 

[doronshadmi]

Verbal_symbolic-only skill(ers) understand Cross only in terms of the location of 0-dimesional space between two perpendicular 1-dimesional spaces, which are actually at AND not at this location (but the don't know this fact).

Once again some verbal_symbolic-only skill(er) demonstrates his inability to get the non-locality of 1-dimesional space w.r.t to 0-dimesional space, no matter what meaning is given to + symbol.

 

[doronshadmi]

Some typo correction of http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7769380&postcount=190 .

Instead of "transparency is the natural source that enables each color its fool expression."

it has to be "transparency is the natural source that enables each color its full expression."

 

[epix]

Some typo correction of http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7769380&postcount=190 .

Instead of "transparency is the natural source that enables each color its fool expression."

it has to be "transparency is the natural source that enables each color its full expression."

In the global_cross_context, the original sentence makes more sense.

 

[doronshadmi]

http://www.tm.org/blog/enlightenment/helen-keller-woman-could-see/ and http://www.tm.org/blog/enlightenment/albert-einstein/ may help verbal_symbolic-only noisy minds to get the calm source of all expressions.

 

[The Man]

Considering a 1-dimensional space on the surface of a sphere, demonstrates that 1-dimensional space and all curvature's degree of 1 and 2 dimensional spqaces, are both context-dependent aspects of the 2-dimensional space, which is the "host" Cross-context w.r.t all dimensional spaces < 2-dimensional space and all possible curvature's degrees that are related to all dimensional spaces <= 2-dimensional space.

Nope, a line can be curved in a way that the surface it is part of is not. This is clearly exemplified in Euclidian geometry. Learn some geometry, please, Doron.

We are all aware of verbal_symbolic-only skill(ers) to get only the active aspect of awareness, but not its calm state, which is the natural source of any possible activity, exactly as transparency is the natural source that enables each color its fool expression.

Verbal_symbolic only skill(ers) are unable to get that deaf persons can think and also be aware of the calm level of awaeness even if thay can't hear the spoken level of awarness.

Verbal_symbolic only skill(ers) can't get that the meaning of words fulfilled only by being aware of their silent source, exactly as transparency is the natural source that enables each color its fool expression.

They do no understand that Lexicography or Dictionary are fulfilled only by being aware of the silent source of all possible expressions.

Once again whatever problems you have with your fantasy “Verbal_symbolic only skill(ers)” are simply yours. If your fantasies trouble you so much then have better fantasies Doron.

Again, contradiction is the mutual destruction of expressions, because of the lack of harmony among them, where harmony is actually achieved by being aware of their common calm source during their mutual expression.

Ah, so now your “harmony” makes your ‘contradictions’ vanish. As the later has not happened (your contradictions have not vanished) the former must not be true either (so you clearly lack any “harmony”). Here’s a hint, work on being more harmonious with yourself (agreeing with yourself) by specifically eliminating your self contradictions and then you won’t have to simply pretend either of those demonstrably false assertions are true.

The universality of Y shape (Cross-contexts AND Context dependent one framework) is not known by the limitation's awareness of verbal_symbolic-only or visual_spatial-only skill(ers), or by any awareness that is based on dichtomy between these skills (Unity awareness is not fulfilled).

Let’s see, first you claim some “universality of Y shape” then immediately assert it “is not known by” some ‘limitation’ thus directly refuting your claim of any “universality of Y shape”. There’s your disharmony with yourself again Doron, no one can even possibly agree with you if you just can’t ever agree with just yourself. Stop being such a lazy, lying thief and learn what words like ‘universality’ mean, then you might finally be in harmony with not only just yourself but perhaps others as well.

Some typo correction of http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7769380&postcount=190 .

Instead of "transparency is the natural source that enables each color its fool expression."

it has to be "transparency is the natural source that enables each color its full expression."

Nope, it is still just a “fool expression." Just to give to a hint “transparency” is the result of the least amount of interaction with photons (of say a particularly wavelength). Reflection and more specifically absorption are not the results of "transparency”.

 

[doronshadmi]

Verbal_symbolic-only or visual_spatial-only skill(ers) can't the universality of Y shape, which is actually Cross-contexts AND Context-dependent framework, which is not less than the calm being as the natural source of all possible expressions, which actually enables the harmony among them, because they are organs of a one omnipresent realm.

Limited skill(ers) can't get the unified omnipresent calm source among expressions, and this ignorance prevent them to actually reach the natural harmony among these expressions as organs of the universal Y shape.

Here is some concrete example of their ignorance, as given by the following phrase:

"Nope, a line can be curved in a way that the surface it is part of is not."

In that case the ignorant skill(er) misses the fact that the curvatures of 1 or 2 dimensional spaces are the "branches" (context-dependent) of, for example, "trunk" (cross-contexts) 3 dimensional space, of the one organic universal Y shape.

Here’s a hint, the ignorant skill(er) has to work on being more harmonious with him\her self (where the self is the calm presence of awareness during expressions, which is exactly the universal Y one realm.

Also be aware of the fact that the ignorant skill(er) ignores http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7773990&postcount=197 in order to hold his\her ignorant view about deaf persons' awareness.

 

[The Man]

Verbal_symbolic-only or visual_spatial-only skill(ers) can't the universality of Y shape, which is actually Cross-contexts AND Context-dependent framework, which is not less than the calm being as the natural source of all possible expressions, which actually enables the harmony among them, because they are organs of a one omnipresent realm.

Limited skill(ers) can't get the unified omnipresent calm source among expressions, and this ignorance prevent them to actually reach the natural harmony among these expressions as organs of the universal Y shape.

Here is some concrete example of their ignorance, as given by the following phrase:

"Nope, a line can be curved in a way that the surface it is part of is not."

In that case the ignorant skill(er) misses the fact that the curvatures of 1 or 2 dimensional spaces are the "branches" (context-dependent) of, for example, "trunk" (cross-contexts) 3 dimensional space, of the one organic universal Y shape.

Here’s a hint, the ignorant skill(er) has to work on being more harmonious with him\her self (where the self is the calm presence of awareness during expressions, which is exactly the universal Y one realm.

Also be aware of the fact that the ignorant skill(er) ignores http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7773990&postcount=197 in order to hold his\her ignorant view about deaf persons' awareness.

So once again you simply claim your “universality of Y shape” isn’t, well, universal. That your demonstrable disharmony with just yourself is so obvious to just about anyone but you exemplifies how utterly useless your notions are at anything other than just hiding your disharmony from yourself. Seek professional physiological help Doron, please.