December Stundie Nominations

Another from our newest "member" Arthur Mann.

Arthur Mann said:
Don't you know that steel is inherently "fireproof"? It doesn't need insulation around it to keep it from being destroyed by office fires.
Click to expand...

So, blacksmiths are just figments of our imagination?
 
"New" people? Hummm....For some reason, I have my doubts!

But, you're correct. I expect great things from him too!!
 
Dave Rogers said:
Since the Japanese involvement in the Battle of Britain is so far unknown to history, I suspect that wasn't what Bishadi imagined he was talking about.

Dave
Click to expand...



Unknown to "history", you mean. Everybody else knows about it! :boxedin:
 
I nominate IExposeMormonism:

You are wrong, pure and simple. Planes don't enter huge steel buildings, wing tips, edges, tail and all, fully intact. It wasn't a Boeing. The WTC was set up, it took time, It wasn't a Boeing. You should watch some plane crash's and see what Really happens when a plane crashes at slow speeds, much less 500mph. A common truck can drive through one at 30mph. The tail can snap off on a hard landing. 10lb birds cause havoc on impact.Whatever hit the WTC was not a Boeing.
Click to expand...

That's a pretty amazing statement.
 
double_o said:
Alex Jones explains why there are "so many gay people right now":
Click to expand...


uh, okay. He's, uh, been "drinking the juicebox" and wants someone else to blame?

I don't understand that guy. If you watch things like that clip he makes about half a claim, doesn't back it up, alleges that "it's been proven" or "they're admitting it!!" without ref's and interrupts himself so many times that he never quite gets to the point.
 
He thinks all gay people wear lipstick and grow roses? Seriously, what is wrong with him?
 
double_o said:
Alex Jones explains why there are "so many gay people right now":
Click to expand...

Alex, the plastic is because the juicebox is made of paper, and holds liquid. And if you think Sprite is natural spring water, it probably explains your weight problem...
 
Sledge said:
He thinks all gay people wear lipstick and grow roses? Seriously, what is wrong with him?
Click to expand...



I'm starting to lean towards the "self-hating homosexual" theory myself. It would explain so much.
 
Horatius said:
I'm starting to lean towards the "self-hating homosexual" theory myself. It would explain so much.
Click to expand...

He wears a YELLOW t-shirt and has tits! It's obvious! :eek:

Oh I so want to see Alex sporting lipstick and a short skirt :cool:
 
Captain_Swoop said:
It was the RAF Eagle Squadrons that were flying with the RAF in 1940
Click to expand...

As is painfully common for Bishadi, he is taking snippets of truth and conflating it with his own convoluted take on the world.

Yes, the USA was actively trying to keep Japan from expanding prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor. The Japanese after all did believe they had a legitimate grievance with the USA to justify going to war. Bish just gets the pesky facts wrong.
 
Oystein gives a good explanation of holohoax physics in this post ....

a) A burning human body releases net heat rather than consuming any. The problem is to initially cook away the water in the bodies, which takes some external fuel and makes burning single corpses inefficient. But once you have dried the first corpses in a larger pile and gotten them to burn, the process becomes mostly self-sustaining, you only need to provide ventilation.
 
Saggy said:
Oystein gives a good explanation of holohoax physics in this post ....

a) A burning human body releases net heat rather than consuming any. The problem is to initially cook away the water in the bodies, which takes some external fuel and makes burning single corpses inefficient. But once you have dried the first corpses in a larger pile and gotten them to burn, the process becomes mostly self-sustaining, you only need to provide ventilation.
Click to expand...



So, Saggy, have you ever tried to have a big bonfire using mostly wet wood?

If so, please compare and contrast that experience with the scenario as posted by Oystein.


Oh, and without a link, your nomination is ineligible. Nice to see you follow rules as well as you do arguments.
 
Saggy said:
Oystein gives a good explanation of holohoax physics in this post ....

a) A burning human body releases net heat rather than consuming any. The problem is to initially cook away the water in the bodies, which takes some external fuel and makes burning single corpses inefficient. But once you have dried the first corpses in a larger pile and gotten them to burn, the process becomes mostly self-sustaining, you only need to provide ventilation.
Click to expand...

I fail to see any stundie-material here.

What part of this is incorrect?

BTW,, link?
 
I believe that should be argued in the appropriate thread. Though nominating something that is factually correct might be a meta-Stundie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom