Debunker says what?
- Thread starter Homeland Insurgency
- Start date
You're either the stupidest liar in the world or you're seriously ill. The Loizeauxs haven't changed their views about their industry. NIST explained in 10,000 pages, none of which you've read, exactly how that global collapse was initiated. Your inability to understand the explanation is your problem.
It seems that each lunatic fraud has his own approach to conning people. You pretend to find contradictions in statements made by sane people when CLEARLY there are no contradictions.
Stacey Loizeaux's views about demolition haven't changed one iota since 9/11. It remains a fact that no demolition company has ever attempted a job as big as taking down the twin towers. Loizeaux's estimate of many tons of explosives and months of work to place them stands unchallenged by the inept fabrications of agenda-driven fools.
How does that help your case? What was the point of the bolding?
Homeland Insurgency
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,705
I didn't post an interview from since 9/11. It was from before 9/11 and I didn't read anything in that interview talking about thousands of tons of explosives.
Nice try.
Foolmewunz
Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
Grammar school thinking.
"Wow, if small is, uh, like, small, ya know. Then smaller has got to be really small, but whoa(!) smallest??? That's gotta be like teeny weeny tiny."
HI doesn't get that the smallest, say, Liquid Natural Gas carrier would still way several hundred thousand tons. Or that the smallest of the Rockies is still a mountain. To HI, "smallest" means "fits in a back pocket".
Homeland Insurgency
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,705
Way to come with the hard facts there fool. Thanks.
Have you documented that 100% occupancy of the towers yet? How about the 100% of the elevators in service on 9/11?
psssst... the NIST report gives some numbers on that.
Do I need to do everything for you?
Alright you're turn. Let's hear your unfunny fact less response.
Last edited:
stateofgrace
Unregistered
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2006
- Messages
- 3,843
Maybe it was that "nano" stuff they keep harping on about.
Sword_Of_Truth
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 8, 2006
- Messages
- 11,494
According to truthers, yes it was.
Foolmewunz
Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
What sort of playground taunting are you up to now. The towers were nearly 100% occuppied. YOU stated there were empty floors. I'm waiting for YOU TO PROVE IT.
You do not know the number of, condition of, sizes or capacity of the freight elevators in the WTC complex. You do not know that there were not just freight elevators, but also construction elevators, and that both had elevator operators, do you? (Add a few more people to the impossibly vast conspiracy.... various elevator operators for the construction elevators.)
So you have the work plans for WTC 1 and 2 for the two months prior to 9/11, then? You'll be posting them momentarily and showing us which elevators were supposedly out of service.
Alternate theory: You don't know what you're talking about and are flinging as much poop as possible hoping that some small amount will stick to the wall. This probably works real well in RPG forums of teenagers. You may not have noticed, but you're hanging out with adults, now.
We just demand that you prove a single word you're saying.
(Hey, how's it going with the Slate article by the lady who knows a guy who met a guy who said he knew all about K-9 security? Or did the inconvenient arrival of someone who actually knows the topic set you back onto another course?)
Foolmewunz
Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
Yeah, but that's like so February, man! HI may still buy into it, but that's because he's on the lunatic fringe of the lunatic movement. The big boys have all run from sooperdoopernanothermiteate like it's carrying fleas. They're coming full circle to traditional explosives/cd.
My feeling is that they were getting migraines trying to make up sciencey sounding things about nanothermite and were getting distracted from their main goal: milking the sheep like HI out of their hard-earned lunch money. CD is so much simpler, and they can sell it more readily to these simpletons.
He can correct me if I am wrong but I think he is referring to how the WTC's were not as full as usual due to it being the start of the school year and people arriving late due to taking their kids to school.
Of course truthers look at this lower number of people there as a some sort of sign that 9-11 was an inside job.
stateofgrace
Unregistered
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2006
- Messages
- 3,843
I'm glad to see they have turned the corner and are now coming out with something more believable and sensible than superdubernanothermate. It makes far more sense that those nasty perps developed nanopocketsizedexplosives, just for the job.
Stick small amount in back pocket, enter building, empty pocket and bingo the building is ready for demolition. Brilliant, I wonder why nobody thought of it before.
Last edited:
Foolmewunz
Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
Nope, he said there were empty floors and out-of-service freight elevators IIRC. The implication being that one of those empty floors was likely where all the skullduggery took place. That's why I want HI to identify precisely which floors were empty so we can then see just how brilliant his unstated theory is.
Homeland Insurgency
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,705
No I'm not talking about how it was early in the morning and most people weren't there yet. I'm talking about vacant space in the tower and "nearly 100%" ( as Foolmewunz refers) of two 110 story buildings leaves plenty of vacant space. There were vacant floors but more then that there were floors not fully occupied. Some of the out of service elevators are documented in the NIST report.
Some people can look it up themselves. I don't fetch.