First off, here is the first sentence.
Federal investigators had no trouble smuggling bomb-making materials past ill-trained and poorly supervised guards. NOT BOMBS!!! JUST THE MATERIAL TO MAKE THEM!!
Secondly, "The committee, chaired by Lieberman, heard how Government Accountability Office investigators on 10 occasions carried the components for an improvised explosive device through checkpoints monitored by FPS guards. In all 10 cases the bomb-making materials went undetected. "
IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE, NOT C-4, not something else HE, but somthing that could make a bomb. Ie: A soda bottle, hydrochloric acid, and aluminum foil=an IED!!!
Third, ILL TRAINED, or not qualified.
"While the FPS requires that all prospective guards complete 128 hours of training, including eight hours of x-ray and magnetometer training, in one region the service had not provided the x-ray or metal detector training to its 1,500 guards since 2004. "
Now, does that make it any more acceptable, **** NO!!! Does it mean that someone COULD have smuggled large amounts of C-4 or some other high explosive into WTC?? Nope. Now, also, take into consideration that this "bomb" that they made could fit into a BRIEFCASE!! Also, take into consideration that none of the building have a bomb sniffing dog walking the premesis. If they had, most likely the dog would have smelled something fishey. A dog's sense of smell is Up to 10,000 times more sensititive than our noses, and have 200,000,000 scent receptors.
I know, lots of people bring suitcases into WTC. but, everyone goes through a metal detector, and their bag is x-rayed. Not to mention, how long would this have taken to accomplish?? Aa few months?? HE becomes unstable and unreliable in just a few hours of exposure to open air, shock, etc. etc. etc.
So, what's your point??
