Debunker says what?

Homeland Insurgency said:
See? There goes the debunkers contradicting themselves once again. I'm a no-planer who thinks Interpol was in on 9/11 but at the same time I'm a no-claimer.

Do you people ever make up your minds? Is there any kind of consensus amongst debunkers?
Click to expand...

so whats your stance?
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
See? There goes the debunkers contradicting themselves once again. I'm a no-planer who thinks Interpol was in on 9/11 but at the same time I'm a no-claimer.

Do you people ever make up your minds? Is there any kind of consensus amongst debunkers?
Click to expand...

What is wrong with you? Seriously. Do you really think that we all should have exactly the same opinion about every twoofer?
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fe..._finds_major_security_flaws.html?hpid=topnews

“In the past year, investigators successfully smuggled bomb-making materials into ten high-security federal buildings, constructed bombs and walked around the buildings undetected”

Wow.

I bet they could have put more then 10 in just one building in a years time.
Click to expand...

Homeland Insurgency said:
I don't claim to know the government or Interpol were behind 9/11 and never said as much.



Why not quote me?
Click to expand...

You're wagering they did.
 
Last edited:
Homeland Insurgency said:
Do you people ever make up your minds? Is there any kind of consensus amongst debunkers?
Click to expand...

Why would there be? We are all individuals. I think the only issue that almost all posters to the JREF forums agreed upon was that the "octomom" was creepy, and wrong, wrong, wrong.
 
Another typical 911 cult minion thread.

As usual all that is presented is wild accusations and assumptions backed up by nothing but an endless series of juvenile games and snake oil salesman tactics.
 
To help Homeland Insurgency with his memory loss...

The question:
johnny karate said:
If someone claims there hasn't been enough of an investigation to know what happened on 9/11 it means they haven't seen enough evidence. Why aren't Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agencies making this claim?
Click to expand...

The answer:
Homeland Insurgency said:
Because they can only assume or pretend just like you. How sad. To do otherwise could only make waves and jepordize their funding or expansion in the Global War on Terror gravy train.
Click to expand...

Full thread archived here for context.

It should be noted that once Homeland Insurgency was cornered on this issue, he predictable ran away from the thread.

ETA: Sigged for easy reference.
 
Last edited:
Alt+F4 said:
I think the only issue that almost all posters to the JREF forums agreed upon was that the "octomom" was creepy, and wrong, wrong, wrong.
Click to expand...

A pretty bold criticism coming from someone sporting that particular avatar. ;)
 
dtugg said:
What is wrong with you? Seriously. Do you really think that we all should have exactly the same opinion about every twoofer?
Click to expand...

I'm just trying to get you all to have a consensus about 9/11. You're all over the place. That story just keeps letting you all down time and time again.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
I'm just trying to get you all to have a consensus about 9/11. You're all over the place. That story just keeps letting you all down time and time again.
Click to expand...

I really don't know if you are actually this dumb, but in case you are: Us having a consensus about whatever your pathetic beliefs are (this is what you pointed out as a contradiction, genius) has nothing to do with a consensus about 9/11.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Because I'm looking for the truth not a pacifier. All I ever find out here is how much people don't know what happened on 9/11.
Click to expand...

If you are not satisfied with the answers you get here you can search elsewhere on the Internet, or even better, contact people personally. A good place to start would be coming to NYC and speaking to FDNY members who were there that day.

In addition, there are thousands of living victims of 9/11 that are probably will to speak of their experiences.

I know some people curious about 9/11 have filed FOIA requests, you might also try that.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
I'm just trying to get you all to have a consensus about 9/11. You're all over the place. That story just keeps letting you all down time and time again.
Click to expand...

Coming from someone in a cult that has so many factions at odds with each other, planers, no planers, space beams, mini nukes, thermite, nano-thermite, NWO, Illuminati, Joos, Jesuits, etc etc etc, and then you point the finger about how it is these people that are all over the place with no consensus ... LOL

The constant self projection game is hilarious and easy to see...
 
MikeW said:
Wow, so many pages based on nothing at all. This thread is a perfect representation of the entire truth movement.
Click to expand...


Bullseye! One of the most discredited frauds on the forum starts a thread about nothing. It is possible to smuggle bomb-making materials into a Federal building. Okay, what's next? It turns out that nothing is next. The fact remains that no demolition company has ever attempted a job as formidable as bringing down the twin towers. Experts in the field agree that such an undertaking would require teams working for months to place tons of charges. Nobody--absolutely nobody--in the demolition industry thinks that the collapses of the towers resemble contolled demolitions.

So Homeland Insurgency is off to the races again. After his ugly public breakdown following his humiliating beating on the serial numbers thread, he might have been expected to adopt a lower profile. No, he is braying loudly and flailing wildly, contending--what? Does anybody know what he is trying to claim here?
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
We're not talking about my beliefs. I don't claim to know what happened on 9/11. That would be you.
Click to expand...


Wrong again, You claim, as someone with very little education, that experts in various fields are wrong. You never get around to explaining how you know they're wrong. Here's an example:

Tell us why all the demolition experts are wrong.

Bye.
 
FineWine said:
Wrong again, You claim, as someone with very little education, that experts in various fields are wrong. You never get around to explaining how you know they're wrong. Here's an example:

Tell us why all the demolition experts are wrong.

Bye.
Click to expand...

Which demolition experts?
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
I'm just trying to get you all to have a consensus about 9/11. You're all over the place. That story just keeps letting you all down time and time again.
Click to expand...


You've been caught lying again. You are as usual, unable to back up your dishonest claims. What do people on the sane side disagree about? Take your time.

Take a gander at 911myths.com. You want consensus among debunkers, you got consensus. All of us accept Mike Williams's invaluable resource as the place to go for accurate information.
 
FineWine said:
You've been caught lying again. You are as usual, unable to back up your dishonest claims. What do people on the sane side disagree about? Take your time.

Take a gander at 911myths.com. You want consensus among debunkers, you got consensus. All of us accept Mike Williams's invaluable resource as the place to go for accurate information.
Click to expand...

The only one who debunks less then 911myths is Gravy and his googlepages.

I read that crap to get confidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom