Dear Mike (Michael Moore)

[Ion]

I guess its insignaficant that for once in many years the Iraqi people actually may get a chance to decide how to run things.
...

Iraqis are not deciding.

Is the CIA that props a guy now.

Like Saddam was propped in the 60s.

 

[Nasarius]

Also, when the troops went into the palaces, I believe there was not much left to find. There was so much stuff in those palaces, I wonder where it all went??

Looted, just like the museums, when they knew they were going to lose.

 

[Kitty Chan]

Looted, just like the museums, when they knew they were going to lose.

I know the museum was looted, but I thought it was reported the palaces were cleaned out by Saddams "house" they basically took most things.

I remember reading about a maid escaping from them (although I cant imagine why she would do that) but she was saying they loaded up stuff to take to the country somewhere.

 

[Kitty Chan]

Heres a site of a CIA member who has some ideas on how to run things

http://english.daralhayat.com/opini...425a88-c0a8-01ed-0000-15e44e377b5d/story.html

One of the biggest concerns everyone had at the start of this is that "the US better not attack and leave like last time"

So, the US stays and now thats not good enough either.

You are right the Iraqi people will lose, because everyones argueing about should have, would have, could have. Imagine if all that energy would be applied to the problem of getting the government together!

BTW theres still that Saddam idea out there, to put it all back. I cant see him objecting.

 

[Ion]

...
You are right the Iraqi people will lose, because everyones argueing about should have, would have, could have. Imagine if all that energy would be applied to the problem of getting the government together!
...

This is why in February 2003, Powell -under Bush- shouldn't have lied about Iraq in U.N..

You see what tragedy the world came at today because of that lying by the U.S. government (and not because of Moore)?

 

[Kitty Chan]

This is why in February 2003, Powell -under Bush- shouldn't have lied about Iraq in U.N..

You see what tragedy the world came at today because of that lying by the U.S. government (and not because of Moore)?

OH I see your right! they should release Saddam and put it all back like it was.

Moore could do another movie, Saddam made a movie of his take over. Moore could do the sequel. I see how silly I was now, consider me changed.

 

[Ion]

OH I see your right! they should release Saddam and put it all back like it was.
...

What about thousands of Iraqis who died when U.S. attacked Iraq, and who didn't have much to do with Saddam?

Better think of them, before starting a war.

But you don't think, even after starting the war and killing them.
Bush doesn't either.

The world does.

 

[RandFan]

OH I see your right! they should release Saddam and put it all back like it was.

Moore could do another movie, Saddam made a movie of his take over. Moore could do the sequel. I see how silly I was now, consider me changed.

You need to understand that you are talking with a major league a$$hole. Ion is a troll. He has little if any respect from any one on this forum. He is despised by people from the left as well as the right.

He doesn't respond to logic or reason. His responses are all the same. He is a hateful, bigoted, small minded person. If you notice most people don't respond to him because it is a waste of time.

Please note the a$$inine response he will give to this post.

 

[Ion]

Chan, don't listen to this:

You need to understand that you are talking with a major league a$$hole. Ion is a troll. He has little if any respect from any one on this forum. He is despised by people from the left as well as the right.

He doesn't respond to logic or reason. His responses are all the same. He is a hateful, bigoted, small minded person. If you notice most people don't respond to him because it is a waste of time.

Please note the a$$inine response he will give to this post.

This is better:
......................

You need to understand that RF is a major league a$$hole. RF is a troll. He has little if any respect from any one on this forum. He is despised by people from the left as well as the right.

He doesn't respond to logic or reason. His responses are all the same. He is a hateful, bigoted, small minded person. If you notice most people don't respond to him because it is a waste of time.

Please note the a$$inine response RF will give to this post.

 

[RandFan]

Please note the a$$inine response he will give to this post.

Thanks Ion,

You are such a bastion of thought. Your original ideas never fail to inspire. The fact that you consider all points of view and avoid fallacious argument is something we all should strive for.

 

[Kitty Chan]

You need to understand that you are talking with a major league a$$hole. Ion is a troll. He has little if any respect from any one on this forum. He is despised by people from the left as well as the right.

He doesn't respond to logic or reason. His responses are all the same. He is a hateful, bigoted, small minded person. If you notice most people don't respond to him because it is a waste of time.

Please note the a$$inine response he will give to this post.

Why thank you for your response, I understand why he loves Saddam so much, he is such a great man and sooo misunderstood. I think Moore should do a movie on him and enlighten the masses.

I have a sneaky feeling you may know why Saddam felt so strongly about the children. . .

 

[Ion]

...
Please note the a$$inine response RF will give to this post.

Thanks, RF.

 

[Ion]

Why thank you for your response, I understand why he loves Saddam so much, he is such a great man and sooo misunderstood.
...

Chan,

I understand how you love Saddam more than I do:

you support the war that kills Iraqis.

 

[Kitty Chan]

Chan,

I understand how you love Saddam more than I do:

you support the war that kills Iraqis.

How do I support the war?

Im from Canada

and my wishy washy French influenced LIBERAL government is hell bent on bleeding us. Maybe if we locked our doors we could keep them out. . .

 

[Ion]

How do I support the war?...
. . .

With your posts.

Like:

"...I don't know Im sure Bush needs critics to keep him in line the absolute power thing..."

Considering that Bush started this war against Iraq, not Saddam, yes Bush needs to be kept in line.

 

[Kitty Chan]

With your posts.

Like:

"...I don't know Im sure Bush needs critics to keep him in line the absolute power thing..."

Considering Bush starting this war against Iraq, not Saddam, yes Bush needs to be kept in line.

Who was keeping Saddam in line

 

[RandFan]

Thanks, RF.

One post too late but you are welcome none-the-less.

 

[Otther]

Uh...

I just wanted to mention that while I understand the position that 1441 was not breached because the UNSC did not say it was so... it seems to me an absurd one as had the presidential idiot been correct about the WMDs, and we had found several completed nuclear bombs in Iraq... the one taking this position would be forced by consistency to say that Saddam was still not in breach (at least before the UNSC reacted to the hypothetical findings). I do not doubt demon's ( and IdiotIon's) sincerity, as it appears to me such conviction could be the only thing able to compel one to use an argument so disconected from the real world.

 

[Ion]

Who was keeping Saddam in line

U.N..

 

[Ion]

Since you understand this:

Uh...

I just wanted to mention that while I understand the position that 1441 was not breached...
...
...( and IdiotIon's)...
...

then, don't waste time, resources and people, OttherIdiot.

Otherwise, see what tragedy you generate in the world?