• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Dawn Vignola Account

mudlark said:
I don't know that. All I know is that BCR claims that's what she said to him and he is unwilling to prove it. Since there is no interview that was published by CIT at all it is impossible for them to have distorted or twisted her words. So either BCR is lying, Vignola is lying, or both are lying. Which do you think it is?
Click to expand...

Or perhaps CIT is lying?
 
mudlark said:
You know very well what I meant by that statement.
BCR made an accusation that CIT had ´distorted´ her words in an alleged ´interview´
Click to expand...

No, be accurate. DAWN made an accusation that CIT had 'distorted' her words from an interview that Craig claims took place but that for which she wished not to appear on camera. Please keep up mudlark.
 
LashL said:
Heh. Spoken as only someone entirely unfamiliar with both police work and journalism could speak. This made me laugh. Out loud.
Click to expand...

It is quite funny actually. I know things have changed but back in the day when I was a police officer I only recall using a recorder on a field interview once. We had two suspects in the back of the car and left a tape recorder running to record their conversation. We then separated them and interviewed them using the taped conversation as a guide. But we did not record the field interview though.

I think most cops don't want their interviews recorded because some defense lawyer years down the road is just as likely to use it against them to get their client off.
 
Hokulele said:
You understand that real life isn't like what they show on TV, yes?
Click to expand...

What?

Are you insane?

Real life isn't like TV?

What about youtube or googlevideo? The truthers tell me that those are excellent "sources"......

Lord knows that engineers go to youtube first when doing research instead of reading peer reviewed articles or similar sources....
 
Wow. A full page of posts and still no links.

Here´s Craig Ranke´s response to this ´thread´ and Larson´s pathetic
opinion piece

Edited by Locknar: 
Do not post/proxy for members that have been banned.


Enjoy..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mudlark said:
Wow. A full page of posts and still no links.

Here´s Craig Ranke´s response to this ´thread´ and Larson´s pathetic
opinion piece

Edited by Locknar: 
Moderated content removed/


Enjoy..
Click to expand...

What is Craigs response to this:


This area is "under construction", but it will eventually be a place for you to report the outcome of your Operation Accountability efforts. For now please contact us via e-mail with any information. Thank you.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mudlark said:
Wow. A full page of posts and still no links.
Click to expand...

What is up with the links thing? This new generation really irks me. In college I was taught to do original research, use the library and work proofs. Now it is nothing but 'give me links' and youtube. No link or cute youtube video and it ain't true. Our future is not in good hands.
 
BCR said:
What is up with the links thing? This new generation really irks me. In college I was taught to do original research, use the library and work proofs. Now it is nothing but 'give me links' and youtube. No link or cute youtube video and it ain't true. Our future is not in good hands.
Click to expand...

The YouTube Generation: Be afraid. Be very afraid.
 
mudlark said:
Wow. A full page of posts and still no links.

Here´s Craig Ranke´s response to this ´thread´ and Larson´s pathetic
opinion piece

Edited by Locknar: 
Moderated content removed.


Enjoy..
Click to expand...

That's hilarious. After Craig posts a huge, single-spaced, wall o-text regarding this insignificant minutia, the first "approving" comment is this:

onesliceshort Posted: Feb 2 2010 said:
Just how much time do Larson, Wolsey and Arabesque devote to creating their libelous blogs man??
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was just reading this write-up by Erik:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/01/dawn-vignolas-account-vs-cits-methods.html


If I could just give a bit of feedback, his point about the intervening buildings not existing on 9/11, such that the view would have been less obstructed, is not that well founded imo. The building in the foreground of http://i346.photobucket.com/albums/p429/Gorlagna/IMG_1393.jpg was under construction on 9/11, but it does not actually obstruct the flight path. The building that DOES obstruct the view, the Pentagon Row, was built and standing on 9/11. But there IS a clear view of the impact site at the Pentagon from the third floor and above (looks like a little bit of the second floor is visible as well). This means that Timmerman and Vignola definitely would have seen the vertical stabilizer hit the building. If Timmerman could not have seen the rest of the plane, then this might explain why his description of the crash differs from the rest. He couldn't see the plane hit the power generator on the lawn, but it probably exploded or threw up debris when the plane hit it, which he interpreted as the plane hitting the ground just short of the building. And he described the wings being thrown forward....maybe in that split second he interpreted the tail as an upended left wing which struck the building immediately after. His description kind of makes sense if we assume that he couldn't have seen anything that was actually happening at ground level.

And of course, it is needless to say that Timmerman would have been a star witness to a flyover, had there have been one.
 
Last edited:
Bump for Mudlark. No, the Vignola account is only 'dead' because you cannot refute it. You are spending your time on the Paik thread arguing over Maya software and ignoring a witness who not only saw the plane as it passed Paik's location, but also slam into the Pentagon. Total fail for CIT, so they ignore it.
 
Just as an aside from the interview: there's zero doubt CIT dishonestly misrepresented the view from Vignola's apartment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom