• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

David Ray Griffin Currently Writing a Book about WTC 7

ref

Master Poster
ref
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
2,685
I heard this on another board from a truther source close to Griffin. That's right, DRG is writing yet another 9/11-related book. This time the topic is - surprise, surprise - WTC 7.

Expect a truther denial of the NIST WTC 7 report. One topic is reportedly going to be the "silencing of truth" on a CTBUH message board. They had deleted truther posts.

How many more books can he write about 9/11?
 
ref said:
I heard this on another board from a truther source close to Griffin. That's right, DRG is writing yet another 9/11-related book. This time the topic is - surprise, surprise - WTC 7.

Expect a truther denial of the NIST WTC 7 report. One topic is reportedly going to be the "silencing of truth" on a CTBUH message board. They had deleted truther posts.

How many more books can he write about 9/11?
Click to expand...

You can bet the debunking will be good.
 
Ref I hate to say it, and as interesting as it is, this may not have deserved its own thread (remember, lets try to keep out the clutter).

Just a thought.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Ref I hate to say it, and as interesting as it is, this may not have deserved its own thread (remember, lets try to keep out the clutter).

Just a thought.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

I think things are getting a bit over-sensitive here. The number of new threads has decreased dramatically. Even on the front page of 9/11 sub-forum there are threads that have not had any new comments for several days. It was only a couple of months ago, when the front page had a maximum of 1-day-old comments in every one of the shown 30 threads.

So things are under a much better control over here. And people post less. Is 1 new thread in this situation enough to cause clutter? Should I have posted it under some random WTC 7 thread, or random DRG thread, or not at all?

Does it even matter? ;)

I found it interesting enough to post, so I posted it. If it interests nobody else, the thread will fade away. Let's not make this a place, where few people tell all the others what can be posted and what can not. Let's not make this a police state! I might call Alex Jones! :)
 
ref said:
I heard this on another board from a truther source close to Griffin. That's right, DRG is writing yet another 9/11-related book. This time the topic is - surprise, surprise - WTC 7.

Expect a truther denial of the NIST WTC 7 report. One topic is reportedly going to be the "silencing of truth" on a CTBUH message board. They had deleted truther posts.

How many more books can he write about 9/11?
Click to expand...

I have yet to see a 9/11 cook book, or a 9/11 pop-up book.
 
Yeah, he mentioned this on the radio the other day. I didn't think it bore mentioning, the fact that he will continue to milk the subject for every penny until the day he dies is pretty much assumed.
 
JamesB said:
Yeah, he mentioned this on the radio the other day. I didn't think it bore mentioning, the fact that he will continue to milk the subject for every penny until the day he dies is pretty much assumed.
Click to expand...

Well, maybe you guys are correct. Consider this thread a news flash to the interested, if nothing else. It really is no surprise he keeps on writing.
 
Griffin's just trying to squeeze a few last dollars out of him moronic fans before the market dries up even more.
 
ref said:
I think things are getting a bit over-sensitive here. The number of new threads has decreased dramatically. Even on the front page of 9/11 sub-forum there are threads that have not had any new comments for several days. It was only a couple of months ago, when the front page had a maximum of 1-day-old comments in every one of the shown 30 threads.

So things are under a much better control over here. And people post less. Is 1 new thread in this situation enough to cause clutter? Should I have posted it under some random WTC 7 thread, or random DRG thread, or not at all?

Does it even matter? ;)

I found it interesting enough to post, so I posted it. If it interests nobody else, the thread will fade away. Let's not make this a place, where few people tell all the others what can be posted and what can not. Let's not make this a police state! I might call Alex Jones! :)
Click to expand...

I debated even mentioning it, for fear of hurting feelings. I made the same statement in a thread created by Ultima1, which I felt, and I am sure others did as well, did not deserve its own thread.

The rest of my post below this point was a rant, on how you guys can do what you like, and that I am done with it.

However, I think that was a gut response to your response...which seemed to be annoyed. I deleted it, like I do many of my initial posts...lol.

I apologize if I am pushing the issue too hard.

Carry on folks.

TAM:)
 
It's not the fact that he continues to churn out the same stuff re-arranged in a different order that bothers me, so much as how on earth he keeps getting the stuff accepted by a publisher!

I guess his faithful public will buy anything he writes and thus Mr Publisher makes a profit.
 
T.A.M. said:
I debated even mentioning it, for fear of hurting feelings. I made the same statement in a thread created by Ultima1, which I felt, and I am sure others did as well, did not deserve its own thread.

The rest of my post below this point was a rant, on how you guys can do what you like, and that I am done with it.

However, I think that was a gut response to your response...which seemed to be annoyed. I deleted it, like I do many of my initial posts...lol.

I apologize if I am pushing the issue too hard.

Carry on folks.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

No problems, TAM. I like you very muchos! My response to you was probably annoyed, I had a bad day at work (the place where the sometimes annoying big bosses tell people what to do :p) . Anyway, I'm glad I didn't see your gut response :D

Let's call this case closed :)
 
T.A.M. said:
"However, I think that was a gut response to your response...which seemed to be annoyed. I deleted it, like I do many of my initial posts...lol."
Click to expand...
Why am I not surprised to hear that?

MM
 
ref said:
"Well, maybe you guys are correct. Consider this thread a news flash to the interested, if nothing else. It really is no surprise he keeps on writing."
Click to expand...
Oh?

I thought it was just another attention-seeking "look at me" thread.

It worked.

MM
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
As many as people keep buying.

I guess Barnes and Nobel haven't heard that the Truth movement is dead.
Click to expand...

You are right, there is are plenty of morons who are willing to by trash written by frauds.

Last time I was at a book store, they had only one copy of one of the fraud's books (I forget which one he has written like seven), I hid it somewhere so it would be unlikely that somebody would find it and buy it. Hopefully, that will be less money that DRG will make by being a lying fraud.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom