• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

David Duke 2012

Jeez, and you guys said I was using a straw man when I said the Teahadis were racist. How come he gets to say it and I don't, huh?

Huh?
 
I refuse to believe the Rockingham is actually real. Is there perhaps no Human behind him, and 'he' has arisen by accident due to a grotesque congregation of various forum vulgarity since the creation of the Internet? Think of it as a piece of chewing gum rolling down the hill absorbing all in its path until it becomes a living, breathing being.
 
Last edited:
Rockingham said:
A quote from "Gomez", a Mexican name. :rolleyes:.... you fail dude, bad. :D
Click to expand...
I'm not attempting to convince you of anything. You are either a troll for whom such would be irrelevant or a degenerate racist incapable of reasonable thought on the subject. Either way the comment was not made for you.

I believe we are beyond the days when an outspoken and unrepentant racist and bigot with minimal experience can win a national election. I am grateful for that, and certainly would be disappointed in my fellow citizens if it turns out not to be true.
 
Rockingham said:
It is currently being covered up by the media, but it will begin to surge into the public's awareness- during the debates, at the very latest. I suspect he might actually attempt to assault David Duke.
Click to expand...
David Duke? Ron Paul stands a better chance.

That surge is just the public throwing up in their mouths at the thought of David Duke.

Assassinate Duke? If anything Obama would help him get the Republican nomination. Nothing else including a Palin nomination would more assure Obama of winning in 2012 than David Duke winning the Republican nomination.

Face it your country is run by a black man. So just sit back and follow orders like a good obedient troll.
 
I like the assertion that David Duke would be giving the Republicans credibility and not the other way around. Very amusing.
 
Rockingham said:
David Duke intends to run in the Republican primaries for president. Given ascendant racial awareness in the tea party, he could well win by a slim margin, then go on to seize victory in the general election due to the awful economy.

This raises some interesting questions:
-Would it be better for him to run as an independent? Yes his chances are higher as a Republican nominee, but his being Republican candidate could lend that party credibility it doesn't deserve.
-Who should his VP be?
-How can he circumvent a PC libtard congress?

Thoughts?
Click to expand...


Your racist trolling is obvious and sad
 
Unabogie said:
Jeez, and you guys said I was using a straw man when I said the Teahadis were racist. How come he gets to say it and I don't, huh?

Huh?
Click to expand...

Because we still hold out hope that you might be willing to argue in good faith, once in a while.

When you use a strawman, the weakness of your argument is pointed out.

When RAHD uses a strawman, he's called a troll.

That you are treated differently than RAHD is a sign of (grudging) respect. Don't complain about your treatment too much.
 
Rockingham said:
It is currently being covered up by the media, but it will begin to surge into the public's awareness- during the debates, at the very latest. I suspect he might actually attempt to assault David Duke.
Click to expand...

That would be so cool. Duke is a poseur and I am sure Obama could kill him with a few well delivered blows. Sure the Republicans would start bawling again "waaa, the president shouldn't kill rival candidates," but they would be missing the big picture. Imagine all the other countries that would fall in line if our president were a stone-cold killer.


ETA. And that, my dear Hitler-loving deist, is how it is done. If you are going to troll at least make it original, funny, or entertaining. You belong in the double A league.
 
Last edited:
Since no one else has mentioned this grossly obvious fact, just yet, that I would like to mention it.

Rockingham said:
...

died The constitution written by whites who owned negros... you think they would consider Duke who wants to reinstate Whites to our rightful place a traitor, while considering a negro the constitutions standard bearer?

...
Click to expand...

While it is true that the Constitution was written by and supported by several people who owned slaves; however, since these people have been dead for about the last 200 years it is impossible for them to know David Duke and/or President Obama, therefore their thoughts about David Duke and/or President Obama are moot.
 
leftysergeant said:
He did, after all, swear to defend the constituion against domestic enemies. Duke is a domestic enemy.
Click to expand...

How is David Duke a domestic enemy? Has he committed treason? Has he advocated the violent overthrow of the government or are all Whites with any sense of racial identity in your opinion a domestic enemy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom