Monketi Ghost
Confusion Reactor
- Joined
- May 21, 2003
- Messages
- 25,141
Have you compared at various qualities of MP3? Several years ago, when I was thinking about ripping my entire CD collection, I did a bunch of tests to see what differences I could hear. At 128 kbps (fixed), the MP3s were listenable but certainly not as good as the source CD. At 160 kbps, the difference between MP3 and source CD was small. At 192 kbps, I couldn't tell the difference.
For my disclaimers: I didn't have any way to do a blind test but at 192 kbps, I frequently got mixed up about whether I was listening to the CD or the MP3. Also, I have no reason to think that my hearing is particularly good, so YMMV.
I typically rip at 192 kbps VBR; when I buy from Amazon, I think they're 256 kbps. But there are a lot of 128 kbps MP3s out there.
It may be that the newer encoders (I don't remember which I was using) can do a better job, so my tests may be out of date. And my hearing probably hasn't improved over the last several years. I didn't test any other compression schemes.
I made a huge mistake when I transferred all my discs to mp3 and wma: I didn't record in lossless format.
Now, on the quiet acoustic guitar stuff especially, sound trouble is revealed.
