Current Fords less fuel efficent than Model T?

jj: While you, strictly speaking, are dead right, I would also argue that your "want" exhibits the fundamental fallacy of capitalism.
I disagree with your "interpretation." What you call a fallacy, I call a strength. If you're an anti-capitalist (or a collectivist) trolling for a fight, then lets just skip the preliminaries and allow me to call you a moron right up front. :)
 
I like your style Xouper - straight off with the gloves!
With my gloves still on, I would point out that various characters from history also believed that they had spotted the "fallacy" of capitalism. Those like Marx, Lenin and their followers - who murdered 100 million people since 1917, trying to prove their argument. Others, who argued less aggressively, just faded into history - their great plans just didn't quite catch on. Anyway, back to the main theme before we get moved off to the Politics or Random babble threads.

It is simply ridiculous to compare a Model T with a modern SUV - you are just not comparing like with like. Of course it works well as an advertising gimmick, and they can pull it off because we call both items "cars". The average rushed person sees the ad for 10 seconds and picks up the underlying message "Ford. Big company. Cars. All bad - somehow".

If it is valid to compare all things called "cars", surely it is valid to compare all things called "modes of transport". For instance, a model T Ford and a Boeing 747-400. I'm guessing the latter manages 6 or 7 mpg. Obviously a stupid comparison. They just don't do the same job.

As Fishbob pointed out, the closest thing Ford now make, that does the same job as the Model T, is a Festiva, which has doubled the MPG of the Model T, and is vastly superior in every other measurement. Not only that, but the catalytic converter ensures that the exhaust it does produce is far cleaner.

Jim
 
PygmyPlaidGiraffe said:
Why do city slickers and suburbanites need 350 plus horsepower in a vehicle that will be used to get groceries, chaufeur the kids, for car pooling to work, and to go through window pickup?
Because we want that power even if we supposedly don't need it. You want to go fast, you need a fast car and a powerful engine makes that car fast.
 
I adressed this earlier in the thread, but I'll try again -

PygmyPlaidGiraffe: Why do city slickers and suburbanites need 350 plus horsepower in a vehicle that will be used to get groceries, chaufeur the kids, for car pooling to work, and to go through window pickup?
Answer - they don't.

What exactly is your complaint, that people buy things they don't need, or do things they don't need to do?
 

Back
Top Bottom