• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Crop circle debunking help needed

Stray Cat said:
Poor Zef never did get the whole simplicity thing. :D

I'd be interested to know what 'Sacred Geometry' Chuck claims is in this formation though.
And as his original claim mentioned "within the last 10 years", why he'd then go on to choose a formation that's outside his own time frame.
Click to expand...

I was trying to make it easy on you
 
chuck4842 said:
yeah, wheres the rope tied to, and what size truck did they carry the protractor?
Click to expand...


  1. If it was me I'd use a stake that I'd brought along specifically for that purpose. I dare say Mr Cat will provide a more concise answer for you.

  2. The same size they used at Nazca, Giza and Salisbury Plain.
 
Last edited:
23_Tauri said:
Good point. Which of the platonic solids is based on the heptagon, chuckie?
Click to expand...

I said before if I brought up an example of a formation that I doubt humans made, I'd be drawn into another debate. I have a sacred formation I'll present later, but if it's ok with y'all can we please finish this here?
 
Cool. I get another go at it.


chuck4842 said:
Wow, I mean just WOW! You showed me how it's done on paper and that proves it can be done at night using what?
Click to expand...


It doesn't prove anything. It demonstrates one possible method of producing the shape you choose to refer to, for reasons known only to yourself, as 'sacred geometry'.


chuck4842 said:
You don't say, so there's no difference in drawing and stomping?
Click to expand...


Of course there is. The drawing is small enough to fit on a page and the stomping is much, much bigger, just as a real building is much bigger than its blueprints.

I'm quite surprised you've never encountered this concept before.


chuck4842 said:
Are you serious? Do I really come off as that much of an idiot?
Click to expand...





chuck4842 said:
Please tell me you've thought of better ways to insult me.
Click to expand...


Just your arguments, chuck. I have no interest in insulting you personally.
 
Last edited:
Akhenaten said:
Cool. I get another go at it.





It doesn't prove anything. It demonstrates one possible method of producing the shape you choose to refer to, for reasons known only to yourself, as 'sacred geometry'.





Of course there is. The drawing is small enough to fit on a page and the stomping is much, much bigger, just as a real building is much bigger than its blueprints.





[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/209954de8e0afa1e8e.gif[/qimg]





Just your arguments, chuck. I have no interest in insulting you personally.
Click to expand...

You've obviously never drawn a perfect septagon using string and a stake. Maybe you should travel to England, there's alot of people there that can do it. I'm still awaiting your sugestion that cat knows how.
 
chuck4842 said:
I said before if I brought up an example of a formation that I doubt humans made, I'd be drawn into another debate.
Click to expand...


If I were you, chuck, I'd jump at the chance to be drawn into another debate. You're getting flogged in this one.


chuck4842 said:
I have a sacred formation I'll present later, but if it's ok with y'all can we please finish this here?
Click to expand...


No need for examples. Just a quick definition of sacred geometry will do, so that we'll know we're all talking about the same thing.
 
Akhenaten said:
If I were you, chuck, I'd jump at the chance to be drawn into another debate. You're getting flogged in this one.





No need for examples. Just a quick definition of sacred geometry will do, so that we'll know we're all talking about the same thing.
Click to expand...

It's like shapes we've seen in churches and temples for a very long time. Can we get back to my example?
 
chuck4842 said:
You've obviously never drawn a perfect septagon using string and a stake. Maybe you should travel to England, there's alot of people there that can do it. I'm still awaiting your sugestion that cat knows how.
Click to expand...


Septagon.jpg

Rocket Surgery?​
 
chuck4842 said:
Yeah, and them dang aliens keep going there. Same bat channel, same bat day. My point was England's small in the 1st place. But if you divide it , it can't be that difficult to do some surveillance. Motion sensors aren't high. A dog maybe even?
Click to expand...
So, given this logic... the UK, especially London, is the most surveilled city in the world when comparing CCTV on public streets vs head of population.

By your logic, therefore, there should be no opportunity for any graffiti to be sprayed on any building in London without the "artist" being caught.:cool:
 
Akhenaten said:
[qimg]http://www.yvonneclaireadams.com/HostedStuff/Septagon.jpg[/qimg]
Rocket Surgery?​
Click to expand...

Gimmee a break. How could you haul that into...omg! I mean, it could be done , but dang??!! Pranksters really got nothing better?
 
Akhenaten said:
Did I really need to include a dimension to show that those planks only need to be about a metre long or less.

Really???
Click to expand...

I swear to God or y'all I can catch them mofos. I still don't like the fact that one more mouth could be fed. I ain't no economics major. I just know it aint right. Get a friggin job and do something with your life.
 
chuck4842 said:
Let's see, a motion activated pan and zoom camera with night vision good for 100 yards= 100 L thingy times however many farms = screw it. How about just one farm? Does anyone know the percent of the budget dedicated to catching circlemakers? None I bet.
Click to expand...

"none" is probably a good bet. Want to know why?

Catching circlemakers would be a huge money sink. The value of deterrence in terms of crop preservation is nowhere near the money you would have to spend to cause this deterrence.

Farmers are businessmen. They aren't going to spend money and time if they don't get a decent reward.
 
chuck4842 said:
Wow, I mean just WOW! You showed me how it's done on paper and that proves it can be done at night using what? You don't say, so there's no difference in drawing and stomping? Are you serious? Do I really come off as that much of an idiot? Please tell me you've thought of better ways to insult me.
Click to expand...

"All right, give me this thing that I asked for!"
"Here's that thing that you asked for"
"HA! That proves NOTHING!"

This is what we call "moving the goalposts"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom