Their revelations helped coincidence, or a policeman, who also thought plain-clothes work
Heh, I love translator programs.
Those plain clothes need to get a job.
Their revelations helped coincidence, or a policeman, who also thought plain-clothes work
School just restarted. Most of them are back in High School this week. All that are left are the drop outs.What is with the trolls recently? There's just no effort or passion going into these things now, it's like being on 4chan. "Herp derp, church burn down, must be atheist. U mad atheists? lolololol."
I can't wait to see who the passive-aggressive dick of the week is.
That's pretty passive-aggressive of you.
![]()
I have always found it funny that the forum software automatically assigns the title 'Critical thinker' to guys like this. Perhaps we could leave out the 'h' for better sense?That happened in Czech Republic, not in Norway.
He was an atheist by a strong implication: He stole a bike and had a modest criminal record. So he was an atheist.
My system of belief is based on intelligence along with rational logic based on evidence. Sorry if your unintelligent irrational illogical OP based on your random speculation is a source of amusement.Don't you think that you should restraint yourself upon finding that the OP failed to subscribe to your system of belief?
While I realize that you are desperate to score points by projecting your source of epic failure onto others, it is a pretty bad habit you really need to fix. Please don't blame your failures onto others. Have some balls to take responsibility for your failures.Emotional outbursts don't make an argument.
If you've chosen your guiding light by putting all your trust in the intelligence of other people and their ability to use it for the purpose of providing comprehensive evidence, then you should make an attempt to learn from them and limit your tantrum to the level of a mere amusement.My system of belief is based on intelligence along with rational logic based on evidence.
We never burn. We only simmer.Yeah, any evidence it was an atheist? Maybe it was an agnostic. A Muslim. A Hebrew. A Pastafarian.
In Norway some churches were burned by satanists, you know.
That happened in Czech Republic, not in Norway.
He was an atheist by a strong implication: He stole a bike and had a modest criminal record. So he was an atheist.

If you've chosen your guiding light by putting all your trust in the intelligence of other people and their ability to use it for the purpose of providing comprehensive evidence, then you should make an attempt to learn from them and limit your tantrum to the level of a mere amusement.
The article said that the arsonist stole a motorcycle. Since the theists go by "You shall not steal," I concluded that the arsonist was an atheist with no moral barrier between him and and other people's property. A chapel went up in smoke; he stole . . . it looked like the dude was an atheist, not a theist. Theists usually respect other people gods, so even if he was a Jehovah Witness, for example, he wouldn't burn other people's place of worship -- unless there was some religious war going on. But there was none.
Surely you gest. Maybe it's a language barrier on your part but your logic is laughable as written.
There was not even a motive given. You need to make your own conclusion, as I did.According to the translated article as I read it, not one word is mentioned about the perpetrator's atheism or any other religion. I'm not sure there is even a motive noted.