Creationists basis for arguements

[Ceritus]

http://www.drdino.com/downloads.php


all their lil skewed science can be found here and downloaded a religious fanatic friend of mine sent me this to prove evolution is wrong.

I have so far only been able to view one. this site has like no bandwith.

 

[Dr Adequate]

Try reading their articles instead. They give just as good a picture of Kent Hovind's particular brand of gobbledegook.

This one, by Hovind himself is very revealing. In particular, it reveals that in all his years of ranting and raving about evolution, he has been too lazy to find out what the theory of evolution is. (Either that, of course, or the man is a deliberate liar.) And yet he has the gall to pretend to teach people on a subject of which he is completely ignorant.

 

[Eos of the Eons]

Yep, Hovind, now Veith. They simply lie about science. They erect strawmen and burn them. Any particular points you have questions on, please ask. I've tried to address some myself, but there are so darn many!

I saw Veith in person. He claims scientist are soooo stupid that they would try to say it takes tens of thousands of years to bury a plane under ice even though we know it took only 50 years:

Carl Wieland, purports to show that, because a group of WWII airplanes were buried under several hundred feet of ice in 50 years, the technique of ice core dating is based on false premises

http://www.holysmoke.org/cretins/cre-ice.htm

It's funny how people like Veith and Hovind repeat the same lies even though they are so easily refuted. Then creationists are left with these lies and don't bother to check into them because they would rather think scientists are bumbling morons. They are all just robbing each other of a fascinating and real world.