kevinquinnyo
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 1,584
No. Those are both bad choices,.... but letting him continue to get and release documents would be less bad. The problem is that Assange is a figurehead; killing Assange wouldn't stop the leaks, and would add credibility to the leaks (since someone obviously took the information seriously enough to kill for it).
Moving the goalposts much? INRM's rather silly suggestion was that "the bankers" would get their friends in the CIA to kill him. The suggestion is rather silly for several reasons -- "the bankers" are unlikely to act as a unit; if they did act as a unit, they wouldn't want to assassinate him, and even if they wanted to, the CIA wouldn't play along, because it's a stupid move.
That's not to say that the North Koreans wouldn't want to kill Assange precisely because it would hurt the CIA. But the idea that the CIA would shoot itself in the foot like this because "the bankers" want to shoot themselves in the foot and need the CIA to pull the trigger,.... well, I'm not sure if it's within forum rules to call an irrational paranoid conspiracy fantasist an irrational paranoid conspiracy fantasist.
LOL i wish there was a "like" button for comments here
