Mine haven't I just find it emotionally draining arguing with so many people at once.
Just found this interesting graph ... which I'm sure the believers can explain perfectly well. It shows every item (represented by a clickable dot) published by the medical journal, Eurosurveillance, under the three categories, Rapid Communications, Research Papers and Surveillance Reports from 2015-2020.
x-axis: date
y-axis: period of review (in days) before publication
Right at the bottom under Research papers on 21-1-20 is that famous Corman Drosten paper ... but it's still science right, 1-day review is still science for that one paper even if the review period for every other paper is nothing remotely as short.
EDIT: Sorry this link is to the person who posted the graph
http://www.aukema.org/2020/12/meta-data-analysis-at.html
The graph is here:
https://public.tableau.com/app/prof...ateurosurveillance_org/ReviewProcessDashboard