Merged Core-led collapse and explosive demolition

DGM said:
Ah no. I know exactly what he's talking about.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you do. I'm sure you will also never explain it for us.

So, DGM, could the towers have been brought down by verinage? Yes or no?
 
ergo said:
I'm sure you do. I'm sure you will also never explain it for us.

So, DGM, could the towers have been brought down by verinage? Yes or no?
Click to expand...

Not in a million years.

AND! I know why. But I'm keeping it a secret. Part of my disinformation agent training.
 
ergo said:
I'm sure you do. I'm sure you will also never explain it for us.

So, DGM, could the towers have been brought down by verinage? Yes or no?
Click to expand...
In the context of 9/11, No way.

In the context of the theoretical world, sure.

Do you know the difference?
 
ergo:

Your problem here is context. I know what NoahFence's context is (as would be correct considering this conversation). You are trying to be smart and play this against us. Unfortunately for you, we have functioning brains,
 
He can't understand the difference between 'into' and 'onto'. Do you really expect him to understand a concept such as context?
 
DGM said:
Funny how he figures he could get us to fight about something we both understood and agreed on.

:boggled:
Click to expand...

Yeah, Ergo doesn't do logic, context, facts or....well......anything well when it comes to the events of 9/11. He's clueless.
 
It might not be possible totake down a building like the towers by verinage because the core is immensely stronger than the floors or the perimeter columns. Note that the dropping ogf the upper part of the core onto the lower did not crush it down. The weight of the debris was thus shunted aside to the floors. Part of the problem is that it is impossible to keep two relatively small elements aligned for the whole process. The standing core is too small and hard a target for the upper block core columns, and the upper co,umns did not fall straight down.
 
Oh, he knows full well it wasn't done on 9/11 - he just wants one of us to admit that it was possible for a really big building to be demo'd in that fashion, so he can go AH HA!

I just got off the phone with my mother thanking her for not making me ergo.
 
ergo said:
Source? It is not mentioned in the patent. We discussed this last fall in another thread.



Highly doubtful, lefty, but feel free to provide a source for this claim.
Click to expand...

Other than that video showing 4 floors crushing down the 8 floors below them... i guess you might be right...

<oh snap>

Yet again....
 
ergo said:
What other forces were at work in the Towers that are not present in verinage?
Click to expand...
ergo said:
That said, aircraft impact and massive fires would only help the so-called verinage effect, not hinder it, so I suspect you don't even understand what is being discussed here.
Click to expand...
Oh, good, you answered your own question.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom