I listen to his words in the video. You have hidden you head in the sand for months.
Yet, you have not bothered to post any of those words, that would so embarrass me, here.
And I'm still confused about your comment about Gregory Urich in post 890 above. If you listened to Mackey's words yourself, what did what Urich told you have to do with anything?
I detect no integrity or interest in the truth in your posts at all.
Your game is so, so obvious.
My game, obviously, is to point out that the purpose of the diagram in question is to show how a tilt of the upper mass negates any possibility of square floor-on-floor impacts that would cause significant "jolts" in the motion of the descending upper block, contrary to your own claim that "jolts" normally observed in no-tilt events such as verinage demolitions were "missing" in the wtc tower collapses, and that the specific angle "at the moment of release" was not an issue in the diagram's original context.
My game, in other words, is to explain the context of the diagram that you are trying to take completely out of context and misrepresent as attempting to make a different point entirely (a supposed claim that eight degrees of tilt occurred while a "hinge" still existed) which the diagram does not even show (no "hinge" there). I doubt that would bother you had I not succeeded in doing so.
Myriad, I am not here to convince you.
Well, that's a step. I'm sure you've figured out that convincing me is of no more significance in the scheme of things than my convincing you. I am reasonably content with the status quo, and you will not engage in any form of contention that generates a decisive result (such as peer reviewed academia, court action, running for elected office or supporting a candidate for elected office) and so cannot change the status quo. I have nothing to lose by feckless pseudo-debate over trivial historical facts (real debate is over decisions and actions, about choosing the future we aspire to rather than the unalterable past) and you have nothing to gain by it, so by all means let's continue doing it.
i post to expose you. That has already been done.
Nope, I'm still fully clothed at the moment. I don't think your posts are having the effect on me that you're imagining.
Respectfully,
Myriad