Merged Core-led collapse and explosive demolition

ergo said:
When you've answered those questions, you can tell us where Billy Butler, Tommy Falco, Jay Jonas, Michael Meldrum, Sal D'Agastino, Matt Komorowski, Mickey Kross, Rob Bacon, Jeff Coniglio, and Jim Efthimiaddes have stated that either there were no explosions or that they did not hear any. Thanks.
Click to expand...

Right, the fact that someone never said they didn't see bigfoot is proof there was bigfoot.
 
I can't say it enough: The beauty of truthers is that we can be entertained by them as long as we want, then we simply turn off our computers, and they vanish completely.
 
twinstead said:
But there's no evidence of any "strategically placed explosives along the core"--for neither installation, nor for detonation, nor for residue. How can a rational person simply declare explosives were used?
Click to expand...

There's the problem.
 
Clayton Moore said:
So how does this gravity collapse work?

Is it something like this?

The top 30 floors fall into floor 80 smashing it and floor 81 into dust

The top 29 floors fall into floor 79 smashing it and floor 82 into dust:

The top 28 floors fall into floor 78 smashing it and floor 83 into dust:

...
...
...

The top 3 floors fall into floor 53 smashing it and floor 108 into dust:

The top 2 floors fall into floor 52 smashing it and floor 109 into dust:

The top 1 floors fall into floor 51 smashing it and floor 110 into dust:

The top 0 floors fall into floor 50 smashing it and floor 111 into dust:

OOOOppps
Click to expand...

Here's the problem with your little scheme: Even if floor x were to be turned to "dust", there is no reason or real means for all that dust to leave the confines of the one acre footprint of the building in the time between smash x+1 and smash x. And that available time is decreasing as you go down because the whole mess picks up speed.

So the dust, which has the same mass as the material it previously composed, collects between the smashing floors and continues on to the next level, being compressed together as it goes. It is still mass, and still moving, so it still exerts force on the next floor down. You really can't escape this.

Next time don't forget the "clunkety clunks"....:o
 
ergo said:
Um, Noah?
Click to expand...

ummm ergo?

How about the quotes from the people who survived the collapse and who specifically mention EXPLOSIONS after the collapse has happened, but do not mention explosions during the collapse?

How about admitting you stepped on your dick about a lack of barotrauma at OKC bombing?

How about telling us the difference between into vs onto?

how about telling us the difference between essentially vs actually?

How about providing ANY citation which states a building footprint includes the buildings across the street or the roof of an adjacent building?

um ergo?
 
NoahFence said:
You're not serious, are you? :jaw-dropp

If you're going to cling to that, you have to, right now, say that explosives weren't used in the trade centers, AT ALL.

Have at it.
Click to expand...

This is Noah's answer to the question "How does verinage work?"

Yet he claims that a highrise cannot possibly be brought down without "tons" of explosives.

Why is Noah posting in this thread?
 
ergo said:
This is Noah's answer to the question "How does verinage work?"

Yet he claims that a highrise cannot possibly be brought down without "tons" of explosives.

Why is Noah posting in this thread?
Click to expand...

Perhaps he is hoping against hope that you will develop reading comprehension skills?

His claim was that controlled demolition of a building that size would require tons of explosives.
 
ergo said:
This is Noah's answer to the question "How does verinage work?"

Yet he claims that a highrise cannot possibly be brought down without "tons" of explosives.

Why is Noah posting in this thread?
Click to expand...

Numbnuts - it works without explosives.

Every truther to a man (child?) states it was a 'classic controlled demolition' - that means explosives.

There were none. And now that you finally accept that, you move on to a non-conventional, even more impossible scenario. Seek help, pyroclastic boy.
 
ergo said:
:D

Gosh, they just keep stepping in it all by theyselves!
Click to expand...

You fail to realize that in your zeal to prove yourself right at all costs, you have abandoned one of the main tenets of truther faith: That it takes much more than structural damage, fire, and gravity to bring down a skyscraper.
 
aggle-rithm said:
You fail to realize that in your zeal to prove yourself right at all costs, you have abandoned one of the main tenets of truther faith: That it takes much more than structural damage, fire, and gravity to bring down a skyscraper.
Click to expand...

Pretty much why I said he had to abandon the 'explosives' theory
 
Grizzly Bear said:
When presented with an answer and supporting links your response was calling every respondent a "beetard" AKA "retard" and pretending your questions were never answered. The only point you have specifically conveyed is that you're willing to mock anyone who disagrees with your 9/11 truth leanings indiscriminate of whether your peers are willing to answer your questions seriously or stoop to your standards of debate etiquette. It's one thing to ignore snark responses that specifically try to ridicule you... It's a completely different matter when you ask a question, have it answered, and then post away pretending it wasn't answered.
Click to expand...

The response I made a few days ago to him...

The entire premise of the thread it seems was falsified long ago since he cannot reasonably explain his own inconsistencies... and of course any time you point it out...^^^^
 
ergo said:
:D

Gosh, they just keep stepping in it all by theyselves!
Click to expand...
I don't think verinage would be reliable in a building that size, or practical, or even possible.

aggle-rithm said:
Maybe if enough of us explain it to him in a sufficient variety of ways, it will start to sink in.
Click to expand...
Maybe I'll win the lottery today.

Which is unlikely, because I don't play the lottery.
 
000063 said:
I don't think verinage would be reliable in a building that size, or practical, or even possible.

Maybe I'll win the lottery today.

Which is unlikely, because I don't play the lottery.
Click to expand...

Yea, the hydraulic equipment, like the explosives, don't react very well to 757's at 500 mph.

Nor do the employees who are just trying to get their spreadsheet done but can't due to all the racket behind that wall.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom