Moderated Continuation - Why a one-way Crush down is not possible

FineWine said:
Brilliant rejoinder, Bill. Now, back to reality.

How do you embarrass people who always get the better of you--who always expose you as an unteachable know-nothing?

Tell us what Mackey got wrong, Bill. You can run, but you can't hide.
Click to expand...

Ryan Mackey is one of the big dogs. If I decide to try to debunk his stuff I will do it with him directly.
 
FineWine said:
Your unoriginal lies about the collapses have been debunked repeatedly for almost eight years. No fantasy concocted by agenda-driven crackpots has ever been debunked so thoroughly as the baseless idiocy about explosives in the twin towers. You are too obtuse to understand a word that is said to you. Why should a real engineer such as Newton's Bit waste his time on you? You refuse to make the slightest effort to clear away the compacted trash that prevents your brain from absorbing information.
Click to expand...

Fine Wine you are getting as bad as T. in terms of verbal diahorrea. Quantity is not quality. Less is more. Listen and learn.
 
bill smith said:
Ryan Mackey is one of the big dogs. If I decide to try to debunk his stuff I will do it with him directly.
Click to expand...


You ridiculous liar! You were the one babbling idiotic no-planer crap about the impossibility of softer substances damaging harder ones. You were asked about Mackey's lecture and you replied buffoonishly that you stopped watching after Mackey mentioned the ability of water to cut steel. Your stupid comment was intended as a put-down, but you quickly noticed that even your fellow frauds were shaking their heads at your ignorance. You were dragged kicking and screaming to the lecture, and you claimed to have watched half of the second show. I have asked you over and over to tell us what the NASA engineer gets wrong. Let me help you, Bill: HE DOESN'T GET ANYTHING WRONG! The lecture is something you could learn from if you dropped the sneering moron pose (pose?) for a moment and acknowledged that you don't know anything about the subjects you pontificate about. You are not in a position to debunk a real engineer because you don't know anything about physics or engineering. You are w-a-y out of your league, Bill.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Fine Wine you are getting as bad as T. in terms of verbal diahorrea. Quantity is not quality. Less is more. Listen and learn.
Click to expand...


stateofgrace said:
Yep that's right Bill frauds and forgeries are pretty quickly exposed around here, guess you missed that part, right?

Talking of lying frauds, your guru made this claim

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heiwa

In order to one-way crush down destroy WTC 1 and 2 you have to destroy the core ... at regular intervals. Controlled demolition is the only way.
Click to expand...

He's wrong of course, because as you have pointed out the core survived. Care to explain why you are right and he is wrong ?
Click to expand...


Ok Bill, I am all ears, why are you right and Heiwa is wrong ?
 
FineWine said:
You ridiculous liar! You were the one babbling idiotic no-planer crap about the impossibility of softer substances damaging harder ones. You were asked about Mackey's lecture and you replied buffoonishly that you stopped watching after Mackey mentioned the ability of water to cut steel. Your stupid comment was intended as a put-down, but you quickly noticed that even your fellow frauds were shaking their heads at your ignorance. You were dragged kicking and screaming to the lecture, and you claimed to have watched half of the second show. I have asked you over and over to tell us what the NASA engineer gets wrong. Let me help you, Bill: HE DOESN'T GET ANYTHING WRONG! The lecture is something you could learn from if you dropped the sneering moron pose (pose?) for a moment and acknowledged that you don't know anything about the subjects you pontificate about. You are not in a position to debunk a real engineer because you don't know anything about physics or engineering. You are w-a-y out of your league, Bill.
Click to expand...

We will see when the time comes.
 
bill smith said:
Fine Wine you are getting as bad as T. in terms of verbal diahorrea. Quantity is not quality. Less is more. Listen and learn.
Click to expand...


Where are the laughing dogs? I need a few thousand. Yes, Bill, sometimes less is more. As you know absolutely nothing, you really should stop making clownish attempts to debate real engineers and listen to what they tell you.

Listen closely, Bill: The thirteen collapsing floors hit ONE floor immediately below them. They crush it and add it to their mass. The process is repeated until the building is gone. Heiwa has been shown to be absolutely, totally, completely bat-guano bonkers. He is as wrong as a muddle-headed human can possibly be. He can't be defended, Bill. There is no part A that magically arrests the collapse. Nothing can stop the falling floors from gaining mass and momentum.
 
MIKILLINI said:
Translation: I will not make the attempt.
Click to expand...


better translation
Ryan Mackey is one of the big dogs who already has me on ignore for the ass that I am. If I decide to try to debunk his stuff I will claim to do so directly knowing he cannot even see me posting. I can then claim victory due to a lack of replies to all my ridiculous and unsupportable claims.
Click to expand...
 
bill smith said:
Speaking for myself I come here to embarrass you in front of whatever spectators there may be.
Click to expand...

I am, in fact, often embarrassed to find that I am wasting my time debating someone with such abysmal critical thinking skills. I often have to remind myself not to take you too seriously.
 
bill smith said:
We will see when the time comes.
Click to expand...


No, Bill, no "time" is coming. You're cute when you're backed into a corner and beaten to a pulp, but, frankly, most of us are sick of this nonsense. You've got absolutely nothing--could anything be more obvious? Of course you can't debunk anything in Mackey's lecture, but even frauds with IQs that edge into triple-digits can't hope to debunk real science. You deal exclusively in lies and errors, Bill. No matter what fantastic idiocy you pump out, you can never win because you're wrong. You can't make your stupid conspiracy theory work. It crashes into reality and is blown to smithereens. It fails on every level. You will have to live with your irrational hatreds and your irremediable ignorance. You have no choice.
 
Last edited:
FineWine said:
Where are the laughing dogs? I need a few thousand. Yes, Bill, sometimes less is more. As you know absolutely nothing, you really should stop making clownish attempts to debate real engineers and listen to what they tell you.

Listen closely, Bill: The thirteen collapsing floors hit ONE floor immediately below them. They crush it and add it to their mass. The process is repeated until the building is gone. Heiwa has been shown to be absolutely, totally, completely bat-guano bonkers. He is as wrong as a muddle-headed human can possibly be. He can't be defended, Bill. There is no part A that magically arrests the collapse. Nothing can stop the falling floors from gaining mass and momentum.
Click to expand...

That argument is too much for me at this time FineWine. I will give it some more thought....
 
Last edited:
From where this spectator is sitting the only one being embarrassed here is you, bill smith. Well, heiwa too, of course; mustn't forget him.
 
FineWine said:
You are not in a position to debunk a real engineer because you don't know anything about physics or engineering. You are w-a-y out of your league, Bill.
Click to expand...

This is the root of the problem really.....

Most truthers just aren't qualified to speak on many, if not most, of the issues they pontificate about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom