Moderated Continuation - Why a one-way Crush down is not possible

And bill smith,

I notice that you have shown the true courage of your alleged convictions by running away from the side bet.

Just "snark & run", eh bill?


Allow me: LoL.

tk

PS. Bill, it's probably the FIRST smart thing you've done since I've known you. Somewhere, at this very moment, pigs are taking flight...
 
Heiwa said:
At contact C/A many elements in C will get damaged and the potential energy applied by C on A is soon consumed as local failures.
Click to expand...

...all the way to the ground.

Happens everytime you drop C on A regardless of size, scale, etc.
Click to expand...

When you say things like this, it convinces me that you are every much an engineer as I am King of France.

And that thought makes me feel just a little bit safer.
 
Heiwa said:
Hm, here is an example of "D" in a demolition class:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsePUn5-88c&NR=1&feature=fvwp

Enjoy it!
Click to expand...

...?

Why do you post things that contradict your claims?

Do you even know what your claims are?

This does nothing to advance your case that the upper section is fragile and will fail in response to collision with a larger, stronger object. In this case, it is evidently stronger than the GROUND!
 
aggle-rithm said:
...?

Why do you post things that contradict your claims?

Do you even know what your claims are?

This does nothing to advance your case that the upper section is fragile and will fail in response to collision with a larger, stronger object. In this case, it is evidently stronger than the GROUND!
Click to expand...

Well, in linked case, part C, was very strong and when dropped on a heap of rubble (part B), previously part A, destroyed by controlled demolition a few moments earlier, was arrested by part B. Big, permanent JOLT!

I think it demonstrates quite well my thoughts of topic about structural arrest.
 
bio said:
yes - you are right - GlennB:

they did not "drop off outside", they were exploded outside.
Queck:
Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft at 60 mph
source: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

How can steel, which was ejected outside, and beton, which was pulverized, form C, a "piledriver"?
Click to expand...

.
bio,

Are you really sure that you want to jump into the middle of this?

What was it you said that you did for a living??

Tom
 
Last chance, Anders.

In 5 minutes, I'll assume that you do NOT have the courage to defend your own assertions.

Tom
 
tfk said:
Last chance, Anders.

In 5 minutes, I'll assume that you do NOT have the courage to defend your own assertions.

Tom
Click to expand...

Come on T. Lay it out in 6 lines and name the judges. It's not much to ask. Gotta be clear you know.
 
tfk said:
.
Be quiet, child.

Tom

PS. Your guardian seems to have run away and left you hanging.
Click to expand...

Well if you cannot be clear aabout a simple proposition like this (in around 6 lines) and if you cannot confirm that the judges are unbiased then the playing field is obviously not a level one.
Therefore it is completely self evident that nobody would take a wager under such conditions. Try unstacking the deck a little.
 
Last edited:
Heiwa,

Are you going to accept the humiliating indignity of this yapping puppy, Bill Smith, running interference for you?

How embarrassing this must be for you...

Tom
 
Last edited:
tfk said:
Heiwa,

Are you going to accept the humiliating indignity of this yapping puppy, Bill Smith, running interference for you?

How embarrassing this must be for you...

Tom
Click to expand...

Is it all coming apart at the seams T ? (A bit like part C in fact) lol
 
Last edited:
Heiwa,

This poodle. Does he belong to you?

Do you mind...?

It is difficult to enjoy a cup of coffee and the paper with a little mongrel humping one's foot.

Would you please put him back on a leash, or in a cage. Or just shoot the damn thing. His interminable, mindless yapping has been an annoyance to several of the residents for some time now.

Tom
 
Last edited:
tfk said:
Heiwa,

This poodle. Does he belong to you?

Do you mind...?

It is difficult to enjoy a cup of coffee and the paper with a little mongrel humping one's foot.

Would you please put him back on a leash, or in a cage. Or just shoot the damn thing. His interminable, mindless yapping has been an annoyance to several of the residents for some time now.

Tom
Click to expand...

I hought your fellow residents might enjoy a little commotion. Those institutions can be a bit boring I believe.
 
Last edited:
Heiwa said:
Well, in linked case, part C, was very strong and when dropped on a heap of rubble (part B), previously part A, destroyed by controlled demolition a few moments earlier, was arrested by part B. Big, permanent JOLT!

I think it demonstrates quite well my thoughts of topic about structural arrest.
Click to expand...

Yes. It demonstrates that your thoughts are unfocused and incoherent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom