The argument here that WTC 7 was anything but a controlled demolition is pure bogus nonsense.
In fact the ONLY evidence and investigations that have been collected or done indicate that it fell as a result of fires started when burning debris from WTC7 entered in through the huge number of broken windows and south face of the building. CD us absolutely the fantastic creation of paranoid minds that have to view the world in a very skewed fashion.
The fact that the exterior of the building comes down in a symmetric free fall can't possibly have been caused by anything but controlled demolition by the simultaneous removal of all 24 core columns over a number of stories low in the building.
A fiction created wholly in minds dominated by personal incredulity. Not demonstrated by any forensic engineering study whatsoever.
The fact that the NIST model does not replicate the free fall or actual building condition during the failure and has severe exterior deformation, which is not observed in the actual collapse, along with it being discovered that those who authored the report needed to omit pertinent structural features to even make it superficially plausible, negates the NIST WTC 7 report as a viable explanation.
More personal incredulity and ignorant expectation of the FEA capability. Criticism not borne out by any attempt at all to create a comparable FEA.
If WTC 7 had some form of demolition devices in it they had to be pre-positioned before Sept. 11, 2001. This means it was a planned event.
Assumes the fiction of CD. Fiction on top of fiction, absolutely no evidence whatsoever to base it upon.
The horizontal propagation of the failure in WTC 1 (the North Tower) occurs in less than a second across the entire 98th floor which is virtually impossible to have happen naturally, and the fall of the upper section shows no sign of deceleration during its fall, meaning it could not be a naturally produced vertical propagation and that some form of demolition devices were removing the structural integrity below the falling mass above.
Personal incredulity not borne out by any attempt to model the collapse. Pure unadulterated fiction.
Finally, the results of 911 were the use of the U.S. military to remove governments involved in oil and gas production and pipelines that were not friendly to certain U.S. fossil fuel corporations.
Wrong thread
However, probably correct and in no way requiring that any group other than a fundamentalist Islamic terrorist organization that had as its core raison d'etre, to rid the M.E. of all western influence and had publically declared war on the USA and western countries long before September 2001.
Most sane and rational people have acknowledged that we have a carbon dioxide overabundance problem in the earth's atmosphere that is being caused by excessive consumption of fossil fuels, that this excessive carbon dioxide is preventing heat from being radiated back to space in the right proportion and causing a global temperature rise and climate change. They also recognize that the only way to curb it is to go to cleaner energy technologies and electric cars in massive ways to get to break even. We don't need to eliminate carbon dioxide in the atmosphere but only keep it to where the trees and vegetation can keep it in the proper balance.
Wrong thread.
However in large part true as long as that electricity is not derived by burning those same fossil fuels.
It is clear that 911 was done for oil corporation purposes and the sad part on top of that is that they were trying to get the public to deny climate change. Ultimately, climate change will lead to massive problems for everyone if it is not addressed.
Wrong thread.
First part , paranoid fiction, second part probably true.
Most realize that the wealthy perpetrators of 911 will never be indicted or even publicly exposed. However, they do have a moral obligation to humanity in general, which includes their own children and grandchildren. They have the money to make a difference and can move us forward. They can induce the use of clean energy and natural gas to get the carbon dioxide levels down below break even and most would not mind them making a profit doing it. The Rockefeller family recently moved its trust fund investments into renewable clean energies.
Glad to know the Rockefeller's are not part of this shadow group of evil powder brokers.
We can make all of the electric we could ever use with wind, solar, tidal turbines, parabolic solar reflectors, and even natural gas (which is much more abundant than petroleum and much cleaner) and this can power electric cars. With about 50% electric cars and clean energy powering them we will probably get below break even with carbon dioxide. However, the investment money for the clean energy and electric car infrastructure needs to come from those with it and that is the oil companies. They need to become "energy companies", as they were at least hinting at a few years ago, and help move us back from the abyss.
So, the Rockefellers?
This is what the 911 shills here should be telling their bosses instead of trying to incessantly spin away from and cover up the obvious controlled demolitions of the three buildings in NYC on Sept. 11,2001. We know there won't be any indictments or trials so just do the right thing overall. Even David Ray Griffin mentioned a truth and reconciliation commission with immunity like what was done in South Africa. Even if that doesn't happen, hopefully the oil barons will do the right thing. We will be watching.
More fiction. Opines that those who disagree with the pure fictions generated by 911T are part of a continuing disinformation campaign. Just how many actual people are supposedly involved in these nefarious shenanigans?
,, and where does I gets my money?
