Continuation The Electric Comet Theory Boogaloo (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.
In the electric model, negative oxygen ions are accelerated away from the comet in energetic jets, then combine preferentially with protons from the solar wind to form the observed OH radical
Click to expand...

Lol. How crap does one have to be at science to believe that?
 
Can I call a halt here? And ask every loony who believes in electric comets to please present their evidence. NOW.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Don't lose sight of what this is really about. It has nothing to do with electric comets, or electric anything -- that's merely a façade; a skillfully crafted ruse.

The Electric Universe has just one single purpose: fleecing gullible suckers out of as much money as possible via book sales, DVD's, T-shirts, conferences, workshops, live streaming events, donations, etc.

David Talbott and Wal Thornhill get rich selling empty promises of enlightenment that never does, nor ever will materialize.
Click to expand...

Well worth posting again.
 
jonesdave116 said:
Sorry???? But WTF are you on about? As I've told the eejit on the Rosetta blog, the "induced" magnetosphere" is due to the outgassing neutrals. It reacts with the SW. Ask Tus. It's pretty easy ◊◊◊◊. The solar wind is getting nowhere near the nucleus from April through December/ January. End of story. You're just wasting everybody's time harping on about stuff that is already proven beyond any doubt.
What is your definition of a diamagnetic cavity? How would a magnetic nucleus ◊◊◊◊ with that? Physics 101. What, in your mind, does 0 nt mean?

It's dead. Gone. Nobody believes this garbage about electric comets. Hell, they've even given up on Dunderdolts. There's only you and Haig left.
Click to expand...

Come catch up mate...the solar wind does not have to reach the surface!!

The same effect happens here on Earth. The comets magnetoshpere induces the opposite charge on the comets surface and indeed intensifies the rate of discharge the stronger the SOLAR WIND "blows" with its time varying magnetic field.

Like I said same happens here on Earth and as far as I can feel, I'm not being fried by some "electricity"
 
Sorry, just more b*llocks. Care to try again? In the light of there being ice subsurface; ice on the surface, and the temperature being high enough for sublimation? No electric woo going on. We'd see that. Diamagnetic cavity wouldn't be diamagnetic any more, would it? Just for the hard of thinking.
Care to tell us what is missing from the sublimation FACT; and what is missing from the electric comet woo?
 
Can I call a halt here? And ask every loony who believes in electric comets to please present their evidence. NOW.
Click to expand...

Repeated.

(and will keep getting repeated until we actually see something)
 
This one threw a spanner into the works as well...

Stardust's Big Surprise

When we started pulling these particles out and examining them in electron microscopes and other instruments, we found even more surprises. First of all we found evidence that the standard astronomical predictions for the origin of dust in comets, or at least the ones in this comet, appear to be incorrect.
Click to expand...

along with the detection of Oxygen...
 
Sol88 said:
Not my problem, 'ol mate, it's yours (mainstreams)



So....
Click to expand...


So f.........w......? Science is an ongoing process. We live and learn. Are you telling me these guys have changed their mind due to reading some b*llocks on dunderdolts? Has Thornhill had a say here? Are they embracing electric woo? Are they ◊◊◊◊. They are far too well educated.
Usual pseudoscience crap. Try to poke holes in mainstream science; make out that any problems are therefore proof that said pseudoscience is right.
Well, sorry, it just doesn't work that way. Nobody takes the slightest bit of notice of EU. For a reason. It's cobblers. Why would they?
 
Ice subsurface. Proved.
Ice on the surface. Proved.
Sublimation inevitable.

Electric woo proponents please submit your proof now. Everybobdy has given up on it. Be quick.
 
Sol88 said:
And the "rubble pile" hypothesis is DEAD because There are no large caverns inside Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. ESA’s Rosetta mission has made measurements that clearly demonstrate this, solving a long-standing mystery.


So...scratch that one to account for the low density.

I see a trend here
Click to expand...

Again, you are talking absolute sh*te.What are you on about??????

Has it not occurred to you yet that you have well and truly lost? Give it up. You're just making yourself look even dafter than than you already did.
 
jonesdave116 said:
So f.........w......? Science is an ongoing process. We live and learn. Are you telling me these guys have changed their mind due to reading some b*llocks on dunderdolts? Has Thornhill had a say here? Are they embracing electric woo? Are they ◊◊◊◊. They are far too well educated.
Usual pseudoscience crap. Try to poke holes in mainstream science; make out that any problems are therefore proof that said pseudoscience is right.
Well, sorry, it just doesn't work that way. Nobody takes the slightest bit of notice of EU. For a reason. It's cobblers. Why would they?
Click to expand...

Ha ha ha

No, my belief is this
using a quote from Max Planck: "a new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."[2]
Click to expand...

And as an experiment go ask an educated child "What is Space"

They go look it up on google at a "respectable" site such as ESA and repeat what they read "Space is usually regarded as being completely empty. But this is not true. The vast gaps between the stars and planets are filled with huge amounts of thinly spread gas and dust. Even the emptiest parts of space contain at least a few hundred atoms or molecules per cubic metre."

But not mention the The visible universe is 99.999% plasma?????

So we'll just wait for the dinosaurs to die out and it will become self evident! :D

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

—
Arthur Schopenhauer, German philosopher (1788 – 1860)
Click to expand...

I guess we are at number 2
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom