• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Moderated Continuation: Latest Bigfoot "evidence" Part Two

RayG said:
No need to Google, you can start right here on this forum by reading any number of bigfoot threads, where supposed evidence is examined and picked over until no shred of bigfoot remains.

Many proponents tend to believe that skeptics are only skeptics because they haven't examined the evidence that's out there. Some of us are skeptical because we have taken a closer look at a lot of this so-called evidence and found it woefully unconvincing.

RayG
Click to expand...

Correct.

A few years ago, like most Americans, I couldn't have cared less about bigfoot. In fact, I hadn't even cared enough to decide it was a real creature, then I saw an ad for some bigfoot show that said they had new, never-before-seen evidence so I tuned in to see if someone finally found one.
The new evidence was nothing more than a rehash of the PGF.

Right then I decided that if the best evidence for bigfoot is a 40 year old film of a guy in a furry suit then bigfoot is definitely not real.
 
Foolmewunz,

Thank you for the info about possibly not needing Isaan in that Province. Since I would like to also move into Laos through the Mountains there I've decided to go ahead and learn Isaan anyway. I think it's the wisest choice. But I did want to let you know I did read your reply in the closed down thread and I do appreciate the info. Thanks again.
Chris B.
 
The Shrike said:
^There was also that dude in Canada who claimed that the bigfoots were leaving presents for him so he returned the favor or something. He posted photos of apples with what looked like mouse or flying squirrel bites taken out of them.

Don't forget the Skookum hokum including half-eaten fruit too.
Click to expand...

Yup he claims this apple was nibbled on by a juvi squatch!
 
I wrote somewhere else recently that science has no problem accepting that previously thought to be extinct are still around. They are grouped in a descriptive and non biological taxon called Lazarus, bit of a lazy choice of name,but oh well. There are hundreds of creatures in this informal taxon,some thought to be extinct for tens of millions of years. Science has no problem with these creatures because of the weight of the evidence for there continued existence.
Big footers want special pleading where bigfoot or for that matter Nessie etc are concerned. They want to dilute the high standerd of evidence that is required for a previously exctinct animal to be officially declared still living.
Evidence is required from fecal samples,evidence of the creature in the ecosystem,from competitive anatomy,the fossil record,expert analysis of living examples and dna etc etc. Bigfoot has none of this,zilch,zero.
Each year vast numbers of newly discovered living species are added to the tree of life, and again there is a fairly high standerd of evidence that bigfoot fails-dismaly-to meet. Science would love to find a bigfoot like creature. It could tell us so much about hominid evolution. They would ask stuff about its diet,decode its genetic make up, and so on.
Ultimately there is however not one shred of evidence for bigfoot,no fossil record,no fur or fecal matter,nothing. This is the reason science and skeptics scoff at bigfoot-because bigfoot is a product of human imagination, misidentification and just plain lies.
 
Cervelo, here is another view of what is in the pic. Chris B.

kentuckybf2copy.jpg
 
Chris, if a family group of GIANT apes were in Oklahoma of all places, there would be photo opportunities such as this.

4s0IV4.jpg


Search "Gorillas IMPENETRABLE FOREST" and see the videos and photos of the types I am talking about.

If Giant Apes were living in the Ouachita Mtns, there would be guides, and lodges and a whole economy devoted to getting Non-Bigfooters, Old People, Teenagers, to the Bigfootses.

It should be like these guys, except not in an impenetrable forest, and without Gaboon Vipers, Green Mambas, and Cobras lurking around.

http://www.lifetimesafaris.com/gorilla_trekking=safari.php
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Cervelo, here is another view of what is in the pic. Chris B.

[qimg]http://bfrpky.com/kentuckybf2copy.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...


Chris, what you got there is better than Bigfoot. It's a pic of Brian Jones. You got the proof that Brian Jones lives and is still rocking out in your forest! Unless... it's the ghost of Brian? When you go there, do you hear spooky sitar music?
 
BayWatcher said:
That looks a lot like Creekfreak's stumpsquatch.
Click to expand...

It's similar to what Creekfreak did to his pic, too.

They are so desperate to see something, they fool around until they make it appear.

They never stop to think that a giant hairy biped shouldn't have to be made to appear on any modern camera image.

Remember this bigfoot is just 40 yards away from the camera.

Chris knows this distance exactly, meaning Chris knows the spot exactly, yet we have no comparison pic of a person standing in the spot.

That one simple step was apparently not worth taking, even though Chris claims to have gone to the spot and made measurements.

The subject is exactly 120 feet from the camera.
Click to expand...

Measurements made on the tree the next day confirmed a height of over 9 feet of this "subject".
Click to expand...

What tree? The blob doesn't appear to be next to a tree...
 
Kidding aside, the level of photographic proof for bigfoot is ,well pathetic. Numerous posters have already pointed out that it would in this day and age be fairly easy to track down areas in photos for a zoological investigation. So far none of these investigations have found anything-at all.
In the past their was a large(even bigfoot like)creature called gigantopithicus which lived for a considerable time in the area of India through china and into part of the far east. Paleontological investigation suggests it could have held on until around 100,000 years ago.
We have a decent amount of hard observable evidence, in the way of fossils, for this creature and its appearance. This is telling,in that we have hard scientific evidence for this creature long extinct but have no evidence, fossil or otherwise,for bigfoot.
The conclusion must be that bigfoot does not exist-period. It is tragic that so many people have knowledge of the bigfoot myth but lack any real knowledge of real actual primate and hominid evolution,which in my opinion is a far more amazing than any myth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom