• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Considerable videos...

given the amount of dust in the air and the respirators they are wearing, it would appear the buildings are already down. did they control demolition the pile just to make sure?
 
BS.

Anything else?

Think again, this is a LUCUS production.
The same Lucus that informed us about the usefulness of balls of string, come the NWO/FEMA deathcamp scenario.
Not a youtube videomaker to be taken lightly.
 
And how about that explosion at the beginning?

Yes indeed. How about it?

I'm tired of doing the Truth Movement's work for it. If you think that explosion was a controlled demolition blast, its up to you to explain why.

Bear in mind that a true controlled demolition would have MANY explosions of that volume, not just one.
 
What about the people who said they had "Reason to believe that there were explosive devices?" And how about that explosion at the beginning?

And what reason would that be?

When exactly was that first video taken and where? Did one of those cars that were on fire explode? You wouldn't be using speculation alone to say that the noise we heard was a bomb would you?
 
JC:

You ask what about the people who suspected "Explosive Devices".

Why is this anything but routine. Go back to the moment...ground zero. There has been a terrorist attack on the Twin Towers. less than 10 years earlier there was another one, involving a truck bomb. Does it surprise you that in the chaos of the moments, before all was known, many people, experts and laymen, suspected, or were concerned about, "explosive devices"???

TAM:)
 
Last edited:
Okay, here's a thread to post videos that are convincing. Here's one:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw

What's your take on this vid? Esspecially the first part that contains the explosion?


Funny. Because that explosion sound is the exact same sound made by steel being heated up and cracking. So if you are implying that it is caused by explosives, what method are you using to rule out all the many other causes of explosion sounds?
 
What about the people who said they had "Reason to believe that there were explosive devices?" And how about that explosion at the beginning?
So what are these people describing?
First floor watching tv sounded like some one ran into my home sounded
like [an explosion] house shook
We heard a rumble,and then what sounded like an explosion
Sounded like an explosion
I heard something exploded
sounded like an underground explosion
I first heard this loud-loud booming sound
Sounded like thunder but lasted a lot longer thought something might have exploded
Heard loud explosion/thunder
It sounded and felt like to me a large object had just exploded in the pasture.

Bombs going off? A controlled demolition ?

Here is a clue.

Just because people describe explosions does not mean that it was caused by explosives.
 
Last edited:
Did you watch the whole video?

I've watched the whole damn video a HUNDRED times. Tell me what specifically you think is the one part where it proves the sounds heard were actually explosives, and why the witness accounts it refers to somehow supersedes other witness's accounts that heard no 'expolsives' at all.
 
And here we are, talking about molten "metal", "explosions" heard and what not.

This is 2006 all over again.

Sorry, I'm not playing this time.
 
Last edited:
Didn't we cover this film before? The explosion being added in since the reactions of the people are not those of people reacting to an explosive sound?
 

Back
Top Bottom