• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

CONNIE SONNE, Dowser

Oh nice, you know the whereabouts of a missing child and what happened to her but u need to write in chronological order.

yeah well take your time, what a wonderful human being u are.:jaw-dropp
 
connie sonne said:
www.conniesonne.dk is my website if you dont know. As you can see, I`m started writing. As I said there, it takes time to write, I still have many things to do. And I still have to translate it all. I will write about how I was cheated, and I will write it here too. But I still write in a sort of cronological order, so you will just have to wait a little while.

Connie
Click to expand...

I seriously doubt that anyone in this thread is interested in your stream of consciousness about "Maddie". Please take it to the proper authorities.

Connie, concerning you allegedly being cheated during your JREF preliminary test: You have been asked before in this very thread how the alleged cheating took place. You did not tell us but simply repeated the allegation. Allow me to remind you of this and allow me to quote Banachek's statement:

"I find Connie Sonne's accusation both amusing and sad. On the same note, I take it very seriously as well. Connie, or anyone else, should think very carefully prior to making such libelous and slanderous statements. I take defamation of my character quite seriously.

I would also suggest that anyone repeating Connie's suggestion - that I called out the card prior to it being removed - as a sign of cheating, place a card in a coin envelope then try to remove it and you will readily see that the moment your thumb enters the envelope to remove the card you can easily see what it is prior to it sliding out of the envelope. This is not cheating. It was simply me, trying to move a lengthy yet necessary process along.

Also, there were steps put in place by the JREF to make sure there was no way I could have cheated Connie at all. For this to have happened both myself, the JREF, and anyone else involved would have had to be involved in the entire crime - and yes, it would be a crime.

So once again, be very careful prior to making libelous or slanderous statements."

If you think your case has any merit, take it to the proper authorities.
 
connie sonne said:
and by the way... I have NO DOUBTS of what I can [do] at all!!
Click to expand...

This statement is ambiguous. One interpretation is that you know you have no ability at all. Is this the correct interpretation of your statement? If it is not correct, please tell us what paranormal ability you do have and what evidence you have that you have this ability?

Please remember at the moment if anyone does a search of the internet using your name 'failed psychic' comes up frequently.

Edit. Forgot to say I changed your quote by adding in the word do. If what I have done is not correct please state what is correct.
 
Last edited:
connie sonne said:
www.conniesonne.dk is my website if you dont know. As you can see, I`m started writing. As I said there, it takes time to write, I still have many things to do. And I still have to translate it all. I will write about how I was cheated, and I will write it here too. But I still write in a sort of cronological order, so you will just have to wait a little while.

Connie
Click to expand...
I would suggest that you carefully consider what you post on your website. This, "But it is also the story about James Randi and his cheating, the things between heaven and earth and several more things. To those who dosn`t know James Randi, I will write about him later.", is certainly libellous and could make quite a bit of trouble for you if you were to continue publishing such accusations.
 
Whew.
I've just been around to the website.
Here's a sample:
...I stood and looked directly at the man while he stood there and talked with a little girl in english. I was not a second of doubt that it was Maddie he spoked with. Very few Portuguesian people speaks english, and those who do, does not speak it very good. ...
Click to expand...
 
connie sonne said:
and by the way... I have NO DOUBTS of what I can at all!!
Click to expand...
Maybe you should try removing a card from a coin envelope yourself, just to see if you can identify the card while still in the envelope as Banachek says? No one expects you to admit you don't have any powers, no one ever does.
 
pakeha said:
Whew.
I've just been around to the website.
Here's a sample:
...I stood and looked directly at the man while he stood there and talked with a little girl in english. I was not a second of doubt that it was Maddie he spoked with. Very few Portuguesian people speaks english, and those who do, does not speak it very good. ...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
So.. 1 in 3 is very few according to Anita?

My irony meter broke on Skitt's Law when reading that last sentence.
 
EHocking said:
I would suggest that you carefully consider what you post on your website. This, "But it is also the story about James Randi and his cheating, the things between heaven and earth and several more things. To those who dosn`t know James Randi, I will write about him later.", is certainly libellous and could make quite a bit of trouble for you if you were to continue publishing such accusations.
Click to expand...

Connie Sonne used to be a policeman, so ought to have at least some knowledge of the law ...
 
Ok, enough chit-chat, let's do it to it:

I will start another poll. I do this with the nagging feeling of breaking a fly on the wheel. However, I have had it with Connie's unfounded discharge in this subforum. Perhaps we can't do much, but should this prevent us from doing the little we can actually do?
 
"But howcome can someone who claims she is clairvoyant go for Portugal in her believing that Maddie is there, when she is not??
The answer is quite simple: IF I knew, that Maddie was NOT in Portugal anymore, I had NEVER went to Portugal the last time. But it was intended that I should go there. Things were going to happen, so I could go on with the case. You can call it the next step."

How convenient. By that logic no one ever has to be wrong again. A prize example of the level of self delusion involved.
 
dann said:
Yes. Her behaviour cannot not be excused with ignorance.
Click to expand...


Indeed not.
For CS:
If you read here, please stop writing in public forums or blogs about that particular missing child. Please. Remember the EVRDs.

As for the issue with mr Banachek.
Perhaps you could apply to another organisation to do a similar test; a success in another controlled test would give credence to your claim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom