Congressman Weiner's inappropriate tweet

Has this already been posted?

The first person to notice Weiner's dirty picture is having the heat turned up on him as his claims and persona become more and more mysterious. According to reports from The Smoking Gun, when Weiner's picture hit the Twitter feed only one person noticed it and publicized it before it was taken down. That person is the maybe-real, maybe-fake @patriotusa76 - aka Dan Wolfe.

RfGpC.jpg


In the emails Breitbart requests a phone chat with Wolfe who refuses. He instead reveals many personal problems and outlines his reasoning for not wanting to be involved in the scandal, and continually asks "Why does he need to speak with me for this?" Wolfe also discusses his fear of being recorded due to an ongoing custody battle with his ex-wife.

To make things weirder Wolfe also acknowledges Wiener's connection to the Clintons through his wife Huma Abedin, an aid to Hilary Clinton citing "Clinton connections--they have people everywhere," he allegedly wrote. "I personally don't fell [sic] comfortable giving him my phone number because of the Clinton ties to this," Wolfe wrote. "Weiner is sneaky and I don't need Clinton problems." Wolfe then allegedly acknowledges his skittish comments saying "I know I sound paranoid," to conclude the interaction with Breitbart.
Click to expand...

The credibility keeps getting better and better. /s
 
Hey guys, don't think about the GOP voting to kill Medicare....

This is a story about Weiner and phallus!!
 
Well, on the positive side, I would bet that the custody fight between Wolfe and his ex-wife, mentioned in his exchange with the sludge monster, is as good as settled. I doubt that the court would rule in favor of someone so obviously bat-crap-crazy.

As to what his obviously pathological mental state says about his credibilty,

:dl:
 
Gandalfs Beard said:
"Cover Up"????? You must be joking. Of what?...A non-crime?

I don't even go near the Conspiracy section of the forum, because this forum (or at least the majority of people on this forum) act like Conspiracies are kooky by definition (which is patently ridiculous).

But your conspiracy theory is moronic. The only people involved in Dirty Tricks are Breitbart and his crew.

GB
Click to expand...

One person can do a cover-up. It need not be a conspiracy, and I didn't suggest it was. And the thing that is being covered up need not be a crime. It may merely be embarrassing.
 
Puppycow said:
One person can do a cover-up. It need not be a conspiracy, and I didn't suggest it was. And the thing that is being covered up need not be a crime. It may merely be embarrassing.
Click to expand...

The only "cover-up" is being perpetrated by Breitbart and his buddies. The evidence is stacked against them.

Weiner is merely equivocating, which every politician does.

Seriously dude! The **** that the National Security Apparatus pulls on behalf of Corporations are truly covered up.

GB
 
Gandalfs Beard said:
I don't even go near the Conspiracy section of the forum, because this forum (or at least the majority of people on this forum) act like Conspiracies are kooky by definition (which is patently ridiculous).
Click to expand...

Conspiracy theories aren't kooky by definition. But for some strange reason, the people advocating conspiracy theories just keep coming across as kooks. Like this gentleman:

Gandalfs Beard said:
Seriously dude! The **** that the National Security Apparatus pulls on behalf of Corporations are truly covered up.
Click to expand...

Oops.
 
Ziggurat said:
Conspiracy theories aren't kooky by definition. But for some strange reason, the people advocating conspiracy theories just keep coming across as kooks. Like this gentleman:



Oops.
Click to expand...

Ooops yourself! :p

There is nothing controversial, kooky, or "Theoretical" about my statement, unless you don't know the history of US Military Interventions, invasions, occupations, CIA backed death squads, CIA backed coups and assassinations, nearly all on behalf of US Corporate Interests in particular, or Capitalism in general.

Sorry pal! Try a little harder. :)


GB
 
Last edited:
Gandalfs Beard said:
The only "cover-up" is being perpetrated by Breitbart and his buddies. The evidence is stacked against them.
Click to expand...

Inspector Dan Rather solved the case:

"Then it was on to Phase 4," continued Brietbart. "While Weiner was engrossed in a TV hockey game, Ace scaled the wall of his apartment and ambushed him with blunt force trauma to a precise point 2 centimeters to the left of the center base of the skull. This rendered Weiner not only unconscious, but induced amnesia. From there, it was a simple matter of uploading the photoshopped picture and sending it to a random large-breasted coed in Seattle that Weiner was accidentally following."

"And when he came to, he was completely unaware that any of it had happened," I said, slowly grasping what should have been obvious all along. "You monsters knew that Weiner was also the most honest member of Congress - and with his amnesia wouldn't be able to say with 100% certitude that the Weiner pictures weren't his. And as the most frugal member of Congress, you knew he would never want to waste a cent of public money on an FBI investigation."
Click to expand...

Using Smacco's Rozar, that sure seems more likely than that Weiner did it himself.
 
Brainster said:
Inspector Dan Rather solved the case:



Using Smacco's Rozar, that sure seems more likely than that Weiner did it himself.
Click to expand...
No. Slimeboy's informant knew something was going to happen well before the incident supposedly went down, just like the pimp knew something was going to happen to Landrieu during the health care debates.

The BigPerjury.com gang aint that smart. It doesn't take any great number of people or a lot of thought to do the stuff they do.

Not getting caught takes smarts. That's why keep getting busted and debunked.
 
Brainster said:
Inspector Dan Rather solved the case:



Using Smacco's Rozar, that sure seems more likely than that Weiner did it himself.
Click to expand...

Given your (Republican Oriented) Political Blog, and the Straw Man Humour Page you linked too, I'd say your credibility is minimal at best.

And given Breitbart and Co's record of lies and fraudulent smear campaigns, I'd say his story has no credibility at all.

Speculating about Weiner's behaviour is not evidence.


GB
 
leftysergeant said:
No. Slimeboy's informant knew something was going to happen well before the incident supposedly went down, just like the pimp knew something was going to happen to Landrieu during the health care debates.

The BigPerjury.com gang aint that smart. It doesn't take any great number of people or a lot of thought to do the stuff they do.

Not getting caught takes smarts. That's why keep getting busted and debunked.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree with your sentiments, but it is unwise to underestimate the enemy. They aren't stupid.

They know full well that by the time this blows up in their face (which it always does), the political damage is already done. And managing to pull all these Dirty Tricks off without landing in jail is a testament to their skills, and the pull of whoever finances their Black Bag operations.

This is why Breitbart and Co don't care about eventually being "caught out" or debunked.

GB
 
Gandalfs Beard said:
I don't disagree with your sentiments, but it is unwise to underestimate the enemy. They aren't stupid.

They know full well that by the time this blows up in their face (which it always does), the political damage is already done.
Click to expand...

They probably over-estmated the level of disgust that this would raise against Weiner. Most of the people in his district are suffering from the violence that GOP fiscal policies are working on them and they know it. Even a solidly conservative district in the redneck back country turned against the GOP a couple weeks back. I doubt that the average New Yorker is going to worry too much about Weiner's making a big deal of his willy to a young woamn whom one might think could find it interesting while the banksters are picking their pockets, as long as he stands resolutely between them and the usurers.

This is why Breitbart and Co don't care about eventually being "caught out" or debunked.
Click to expand...

This time out, though, they may have thrown the pin and kept the grenade between their teeth. Weiner has more than a year to sort them out. He knows already what sort of critter the sludge monster is, and how credible their smear jobs always turn out to be.

He doesn't strike me as the kind who can be made to resign just because some ogre jumped in front of him and said "BOO!" He will have time to explain to his constituents what manner of low-born cur his enemy is. I think that they are bright enough in New York not to buy the same sort of whacked-out crap that some doofus with 16 teeth in Alabama will buy. If Weiner's lawyer has already served papers on BigPerjury.com, a Republicon challenger would probably destroy his own career trying to use this against him. To apply Sun Tzu's dictum, the sludge monster may have fooled himself regarding the efficacy of his tactics in a local race, and the measure of Weiner's resolve to fight back. You may have noticed that, when pushed, Weiner pushes back a little more emphaticly than do other Democrats such as Harry Reed or Nancy Pelosi. He knows there is no margin in compromise or courtesy toward a barbarian.

Punk boy took a nest of hornets for just a bag of bugs and gave it a good kick.
 
leftysergeant said:
They probably over-estmated the level of disgust that this would raise against Weiner. Most of the people in his district are suffering from the violence that GOP fiscal policies are working on them and they know it. Even a solidly conservative district in the redneck back country turned against the GOP a couple weeks back. I doubt that the average New Yorker is going to worry too much about Weiner's making a big deal of his willy to a young woamn whom one might think could find it interesting while the banksters are picking their pockets, as long as he stands resolutely between them and the usurers.



This time out, though, they may have thrown the pin and kept the grenade between their teeth. Weiner has more than a year to sort them out. He knows already what sort of critter the sludge monster is, and how credible their smear jobs always turn out to be.

He doesn't strike me as the kind who can be made to resign just because some ogre jumped in front of him and said "BOO!" He will have time to explain to his constituents what manner of low-born cur his enemy is. I think that they are bright enough in New York not to buy the same sort of whacked-out crap that some doofus with 16 teeth in Alabama will buy. If Weiner's lawyer has already served papers on BigPerjury.com, a Republicon challenger would probably destroy his own career trying to use this against him. To apply Sun Tzu's dictum, the sludge monster may have fooled himself regarding the efficacy of his tactics in a local race, and the measure of Weiner's resolve to fight back. You may have noticed that, when pushed, Weiner pushes back a little more emphaticly than do other Democrats such as Harry Reed or Nancy Pelosi. He knows there is no margin in compromise or courtesy toward a barbarian.

Punk boy took a nest of hornets for just a bag of bugs and gave it a good kick.
Click to expand...

I only hope that this is indeed the case, but, as of last night, even Democrat friendly media outlets such as MSNBC had hosts questioning Weiner's behaviour (including Chris Matthews). At least Lawrence O'Donnell took Bill O'Reilly to task for his hypocritical admonishment of Rep Weiner.

GB
 
Cordova says the photo could have been intended for a porn star by the same name:
“Her name is Ginger — it makes sense he might have mixed us up,” Cordova said, referring to Ginger Lee, a stripper and porn star who follows Weiner on Twitter.

In March, Lee tweeted about wanting “sexual relations” with Weiner and, less than two weeks later, she wrote that she’d received a private direct message from the congressman." http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56172.html
Gandalfs Beard said:
I only hope that this is indeed the case, but, as of last night, even Democrat friendly media outlets such as MSNBC had hosts questioning Weiner's behaviour (including Chris Matthews)
Click to expand...
Anyone without a blindly hard left bias would question Weiner's suspicious behavior.
 
Neally said:
Cordova says the photo could have been intended for a porn star by the same name:
“Her name is Ginger — it makes sense he might have mixed us up,” Cordova said, referring to Ginger Lee, a stripper and porn star who follows Weiner on Twitter.

In March, Lee tweeted about wanting “sexual relations” with Weiner and, less than two weeks later, she wrote that she’d received a private direct message from the congressman." http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56172.html
Anyone without a blindly hard left bias would question Weiner's suspicious behavior.
Click to expand...

As Rep Weiner's "suspicious" behaviour is not criminal, I am much more concerned about Breitbart and his crew's suspicious behaviour.

Anyone who buys any of the Rubbish that Breitbart puts on his website deserves to be deluded.


GB
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom