• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Confusion

~enigma~

Banned
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
7,923
I'm slightly confused. The woowoo have been claiming that some of the hijackers are alive based on this report from the BBC from 2001.

The confusing part is I still see woowoos using this as an example in spite of this which is a link from the first report.

Today I have seen woowoos trying to redefine physics, doing some new type of math and now showing they have tunnel vision....what next?
 
I'm slightly confused. The woowoo have been claiming that some of the hijackers are alive based on this report from the BBC from 2001.

The confusing part is I still see woowoos using this as an example in spite of this which is a link from the first report.

Today I have seen woowoos trying to redefine physics, doing some new type of math and now showing they have tunnel vision....what next?
The sixth comment on the blog is mind-boggling:

The only comment I want to make is that there isn't much in a name. The fact remains that at least 6 of the 19 "hijackers" were and are alive, (according to BBC reports by the way). Even if they were not, it would not matter because there is much bigger and much more solid evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. Please read books by David Ray Griffin and Jim Marrs; those are some of the best books I have ever read. Please use your own minds instead of being spoonfed by CNN and other government owned media. The building s could not have come down due to fire; it was impossible. I am not saying that, experts and eye-witnesses are. They were brought down using explosives unless the laws of physics stopped being true that day! An airliner DID NOT hit the pentagon; if it did, how come we never saw even one part of it? Flight 93 did not crash cause of the passengers, it was shot down, according to the US Airforce pilots who talked about it to media, but of course you never will see those reports on national TV! Just do your own research and you'd know too just like I do. I know it is very hard to believe all this; it was for me too! I never believe things blindly even religious things but the evidence is there whether you care to see it or not! Those (like me) who care to do their own research, and investigate the truth for themselves, know better . Just think, would you not want to know that what the government is telling you was REALLY true had your kid died on 9/11?
(bolding mine)
 
I'm even more confused, because I've never understood why the hijackers being alive would prove a conspiracy. The perps would never let the patsies live. Just look at Lee Harvey Oswald.
 
The "still alive" claim makes no sense, there's minimal evidence for it, and plenty showing it's incorrect. My guess is that many of the inside jobbers know this, but they're afraid to give it up. It's too core a belief now, because just about everyone states it as a fact (Griffin, Zwicker, Fetzer etc). Admitting they were all wrong would be embarrassing, but would also expose the fact that there was never much reason to believe this idea in the first place, and lead to questions like "if you were wrong about this, then what else?".

My prediction is they'll back off it very gently, instead, and you could sort-of see something like that in David Ray Griffin's interview with Kevin Barratt, the other day. He was asked by a caller "how many of the hijackers are still alive?", and was careful to say that he didn't know. Where once he said the identifications had been shown to be incorrect, the position now seems to be that the 9/11 Commission didn't look at the "still alive" stories. Actually I don't believe he knows that, but I think that's the way they'll go. Say goodbye to "the hijackers are still alive", and say hello to "we don't know if they are or not, but the Commission ignored stories that question the accuracy of the FBIs identification of the hijackers".
 

Back
Top Bottom