BTox said:
- and must conclude that they simply have bins of the 5 different delivery forms and differentiate by label copy only.
You may choose to think so, I couldn't possibly comment.
If you were following the thread on HH where MRC_Hans was trying a proving, one of the reasons suggested for his reported lack of effect was that he might have used a dud supplier. Some conversation then followed, regarding who were reputable suppliers and who weren't. Various people had various ideas. If the patient got better, obviously this was the real deal, if not, it's obviously another excuse for no joy while still refusing to question the great system of homoeopathy.
Great work if you can get it. Product with a huge mark-up (any idea how much original Berlin Wall they'd need to keep them supplied for eternity? - probably not much), tiny raw material costs, no statutory manufacturing standards, no regulatory authority to satisfy, and get this, a final product which officially and admittedly cannot be differentiated from the basic solvent, which thus precludes any possible quality control of the finished item.
And they criticise regular pharmaceuticals! And maintain that they themselves aren't in it for the money? Get real!
Geni's excerpts were interesting. Blind proving, anyone? Meditation on an unknown remedy? I think not. Funny how the proving symptoms always seem to have some sort of metaphysical affinity with the alleged remedy, isn't it? Oh, I've pointed out before about
Sympathetic Magic.
For those who can't tell fact from fiction within their lives due to brainwashing effect ....
Hey, maybe it's a remedy for belief in homoeopathy!
Rolfe.