Or of The Organon, for that matter.goodgirlonhere,
It sounds as if you have one hell of a lot of research to do yourself - you seem to know little of the organ functions?
Here's Hans's article. This site, aimed at UK vets, also has a very good and detailed explanation of homoeopathy, and some informative and entertaining links too.Oh dear. It seems you've confused 'herbalism' with 'homeopathy'.
Rolfe, Mojo? I'm sure there's a website out there that explains the difference.
I am NOT against someone believing in homeopathic remedies.
Afraid I would get "attacked" because I can't spell some rare condition that only a few people suffer from.But it does exist and I am sure a poster here will find it.
The question is how often does an enema/colonic cause a perferated colon?
I think Barbrae is asking the frequency of perforations when using enemas/colonic interventions as compared to those caused by colonic irrigations? So the real question is what is the risk/benefit ratio? I don't see much benefit from colonic irrigation so the risk does not seem worth it.For a treatment supposed to be safe (and no doubt, "natural"), I'd that even once was too much.
My mom is paying $50 per "treatment" for this "therapy". She claims that the "practitioner" (I hesitate to call him a "doctor") told her that getting these "warm water enemas" will help to reset the enzymes in her bowel and stomach to help her digest things properly, etc...
Evidently this is some form of weight loss treatment?
I know it's quackery, but I need stuff to print off and give to her to PROVE that it is.
I already printed off a page from quackwatch.com about it, but it's not very convincing.
Can anyone help me find appropriate material?
Wow, what an interesting discussion I started...![]()
Harken, fellow posters.
I believe this might be the most sense Iamme has made since he started here.
Or am I losing it?
Who could resist such encouragement?!
At any rate, I was just making sure. When certain folks start making sense, I reassess my values a bit and take stock. Although, I have to admit, he is more entertaining that Iacchus.