DavidJames
Penultimate Amazing
You are the one equating change to pandemonium, why don't you specify the rate of change.What rate of change would equal pandemonium to you, Corsair?
Cpl Ferro
You are the one equating change to pandemonium, why don't you specify the rate of change.What rate of change would equal pandemonium to you, Corsair?
Cpl Ferro
You are the one equating change to pandemonium, why don't you specify the rate of change.
Thanks, Matthew, that's something like my intuition would have it.
I'd say it's the primary consideration. There can be secondary considerations like geography or political disagreements. But really, don't the borders in Europe, for example, mostly lie along linguistic lines? Germans speak German, Frenchmen speak French, Spaniards speak Spanish, etc.?
Cpl Ferro
I bow in deference to your superior knowledge of sugar waters.
Maybe RC Cola then?
Yeah, someone posted that in the thread earlier, it's kinda been stuck in my head since. Not that I mind really, it's a pretty song and put's me in a good mood.One of the most beloved commercials in American media/advertising history.
All in English, but you want to bet there would be outrage (Outrage, I say!) that they filmed it in Italy and with all those non-Americans in it.
One thing that's being overlooked here is the new dilemma this causes for right-wingers.
Per Snopes reporting, the earliest known provable use of it was in 1926 - but no evidence that it was said by a specific person. It is thought possible that it is a change on a known phrase involved with the King James version that went (app.) "If Peter the Apostle used it it is good enough for me/us."It's been attributed to many people from 1881 to 2007 (and maybe more that I don't know of).
I'd say it's the primary consideration. There can be secondary considerations like geography or political disagreements. But really, don't the borders in Europe, for example, mostly lie along linguistic lines? Germans speak German, Frenchmen speak French, Spaniards speak Spanish, etc.?
What rate of change would equal pandemonium to you, Corsair?
Not exactly, no. In fact, the borders may have resulted in sharper distinctions between what the French and, say, the Italians speak, but in Alsace people speak German (or Alsatian) as well as French. In some parts of France, Breton is spoken. Spain also has a number of minority languages, principally Basque and Catalan, whereas the standard dialect of Spanish is called Castilian. Also, Belgium has three main languages, and Ireland has two.
Thanks, Matthew, that's something like my intuition would have it.
I'd say it's the primary consideration. There can be secondary considerations like geography or political disagreements. But really, don't the borders in Europe, for example, mostly lie along linguistic lines? Germans speak German, Frenchmen speak French, Spaniards speak Spanish, etc.?
Cpl Ferro
One of the most beloved commercials in American media/advertising history.
All in English, but you want to bet there would be outrage (Outrage, I say!) that they filmed it in Italy and with all those non-Americans in it.
Dear Reiver,
Yay, I have neighbours I can't even talk to but we're all part of this wonderful stew of humanity called America...
How could a French-speaking America even come into existence without being connected with France or other French-derived countries?
Have you never heard of translational difficulties? Different languages are different ways of thinking. To speak French is to think differently because there are words for X in one language that are lacking in another, and vice versa.
Beyond that, everyone here, who are globalist sophisticates to a man as far as I can tell, doesn't care a whiff about tradition, including the several-century-old tradition of speaking English in America. As Thomas Cahill put it in The Gifts of the Jews, (paraphr.) we are creatures enamoured of the New and increasingly despising of the Old, of Tradition. I think this is a problem, that Tradition offers stability from which to survey the New. Endless New is toxic to Tradition and therefore eats away our foundation for identity.
Cpl Ferro
This conversation puts me in mind of something I recall from when I was in high school. My area had a large number of Indian immigrants, where the kids my age were born within a few years of moving to the US. This means that the children grew up in an English speaking environment and spoke English with the standard accent of the area (SO Cal). However, their parents, while not quite native, spoke and understood English well enough that I considered them fluent.
The thing that caught me by surprise the first time I witnessed it, was watching one of my friends communicating with his parents. Both were fluent in both English and Hindi, but the child was more comfortable with the former, and the parent the latter. This resulted in them having a conversation where the two parties were quite literally not speaking the same language and yet everything was fully understood.
I, for one, think that this is very cool and would not want to see an America without this happening somewhere.
I think it's the fact that, with modern technology, the idiots have a voice, and we tend to hear the idiotic voices the most clearly as we remark, "Did that idiot really just say that?"
Actually, this is almost a running joke. What is "American food" anyway? BBQ, probably. And fast food.
It happens in my family everyday. My wife talks to the kids in Spanish, they answer in English.

I'll raise a can of Liberal Juice to that!I, for one, think that this is very cool and would not want to see an America without this happening somewhere.