• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

CNN: Dreamers will leave the US if DACA falls through

More thirsty folks caterwauling.


That's kinda interesting.

The GOP has spent decades courting the fundi Christian vote, and doing its best to remove barriers from the involvement of religious groups in politics and government where they have traditionally existed.

The Catholic Church has twice as many members in the U.S. as the SBC, the LDS and the Church of God combined, whose respective memberships supply much if not most of the religious conservative vote they have come to depend on.

But while busily removing barriers for the fundi supporters they have counted, apparently, on more mainstream groups keeping their traditional distance from the political arena. The Law of Unintended Consequences might be fixing to bite them in the ass.

When I was growing up one of the big boogeymen used by conservatives to scare their constituency (after Commies, of course) was the Catholics, who were all suspect immigrants anyway (and probably Commies). That was one of the popular warnings used to try to beat Kennedy, that he was CATHOLIC!!!:eek:. There wasn't anything to it, of course, but it played well in the South.

If the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops were able to mobilize a significant fraction of their respective dioceses at the polling booth then it would provide a heck of a counterweight to the GOP's fundamentalist core constituency.

And all those fears could come true. :)
 
Trump's bid to end Obama-era immigration policy ruled unlawful

The US Supreme Court has ruled against President Donald Trump's bid to end a major programme that protects young immigrants from deportation.

The justices upheld lower court rulings that found his move to rescind Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) was "unlawful".

It protects "Dreamers", about 650,000 young people who entered the US without documents as children.

The Trump administration has sought to end the Obama-era policy since 2017.

The Supreme Court took up the case after lower courts ruled that the Trump administration did not adequately explain why it was ending the programme, criticising the White House's "capricious" explanations.

The decision itself:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-587_5ifl.pdf

They're calling it a 5-4 decision, with Roberts joining the 4 liberals in the majority.
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, except as to Part IV. GINSBURG, BREYER, and KAGAN, JJ., joined that opinion in full, and SO-TOMAYOR, J., joined as to all but Part IV. SOTOMAYOR, J., filed an opinion concurring in part, concurring in the judgment in part, and dissenting in part. THOMAS, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which ALITO and GORSUCH, JJ., joined. ALITO, J., and KAVANAUGH, J., filed opinions concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom