Cluesforum - How far will they go exactly

hgus said:
Ah finally a good old Maoist apology. "I was wrong, You were right, You are always right. I am a worm who humiliate myself before Your righteous feet." But in Maoist China it was followed by "please don't torture and kill me. Here it is followed by "Please let me post on your forum. I promise that I will not deviate from the forum-line." Wonderful! This is how the Maoist and Communistic parties worked in the sixties and seventies.
Click to expand...


Nor doubt or question actions of the leaders.

In a recent development, its been claimed elsewhere that Hytten is
" is a know drug addict and small time offender in Italy,he has police file for taking of controlled substances"
Click to expand...

youtube.com/watch?v=UGyW-0MeBOU

Normally such a comment could be disregarded for the typing mistakes. Yet the claimant offers a copy of the police record to anyone who asks.

Simon then falls strangely silent, and nothing more on the forum is said about it.:rolleyes:
cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=802&start=450#p2388599
 
It wouldn't be the first time his followers dont question. Prime example would be the disclosure of his family connection with Osama Bin Laden. Was only after other twoofer fractions jumped on this, Shacks 'came clean' and then denounced his brother.

It's strange no-one in twoofer world mentioned it was Simon's job at the time. It was Shacks was responsibility to get sponsors and the funding for Mario Hytten's racing career. Shurely that means Simon was behind it all not Matio?

It is no secret that Shack mingled with the Saudi elite and the ARab mega rich partaking in their hospitality. In a 2001 interview Shack stated that Bush was a 'terrorist'. He openly criticises American politics and the Bush Administration.
Simon's taste in music and his Social Service band reflects Arabic influences.

Shacks own father - an ex United Nations Chief - was mixed in political controversy, denounced and quietly shipped elsewhere.

We deplore the manner in which Hytten has publicly taken a stand against Dolci" it said, then fully washing its hands of Hytten, whose work with Dolci the Swedish group had originally sponsored, it declared: "We will in no way participate in Hytten plans, but will continue to support Danilo Dolci in his tireless campaign to release Sicily from the grip and poverty and a powerful Mafia.
Click to expand...



Now if I was a CTer, I could dead easy come up with a plausible theory explaining the reason behind cluesforum. :p

But yay the clueless soak up everything Simon says. They cant wait to kiss arse and don't blink an eye at his woo and lies. Who are the sheeple again? :confused:


www.omero.it/archivi/simonshack.htm
http://letsrollforums.com/showpost.php?p=232118&postcount=21
 
LTP said:
Nor doubt or question actions of the leaders.

In a recent development, its been claimed elsewhere that Hytten is


youtube.com/watch?v=UGyW-0MeBOU

Normally such a comment could be disregarded for the typing mistakes. Yet the claimant offers a copy of the police record to anyone who asks.

Simon then falls strangely silent, and nothing more on the forum is said about it.:rolleyes:
cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=802&start=450#p2388599
Click to expand...

LTP it was me who wrote that on a YouTube video,I was merely stirring and trying to spread rumors for fun,so far as I know its not true. Sorry.
 
Azrael 5 said:
LTP it was me who wrote that on a YouTube video,I was merely stirring and trying to spread rumors for fun,so far as I know its not true. Sorry.
Click to expand...

Ya troll :rolleyes:
Shack evaded it and the clueless went quiet :D

Content of 2nd post stands.
 
LTP said:
Ya troll :rolleyes:
Shack evaded it and the clueless went quiet :D

Content of 2nd post stands.
Click to expand...

It gives them something to write about,and I continue to be a thorn in their side a year on from being banned off there. Just little contributions to their delusions.:D
 
It is hard to tell what is real and what is not when you don't come out of the basement.
 
I heard that some people at the Cluesforum don't even believe satellites are real! :eek:

If it's trolling it's not even funny. You can see satellites moving across the night sky with your naked eyes. When changing the direction of a satellite dish, the strength of the signal changes. GPS works in the middle of the Pacific ocean.

How can they make such a blatantly false claim like denying the existence of satellites? :confused:
 
Anders Lindman said:
I heard that some people at the Cluesforum don't even believe satellites are real! :eek:

If it's trolling it's not even funny. You can see satellites moving across the night sky with your naked eyes. When changing the direction of a satellite dish, the strength of the signal changes. GPS works in the middle of the Pacific ocean.

How can they make such a blatantly false claim like denying the existence of satellites? :confused:
Click to expand...

Because, like you, they invent anything to support their fantasy du jour.

I find it fascinating that you are unaware that you do exactly what they do.
 
Anders Lindman said:
I heard that some people at the Cluesforum don't even believe satellites are real! :eek:

If it's trolling it's not even funny. You can see satellites moving across the night sky with your naked eyes. When changing the direction of a satellite dish, the strength of the signal changes. GPS works in the middle of the Pacific ocean.

How can they make such a blatantly false claim like denying the existence of satellites? :confused:
Click to expand...

You should join their forum for they are just like you...if a bit more classy and down to earth.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Even my wildest conspiracy speculations aren't anything near that claim. To believe all satellites are fake is just ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Equally ridiculous, just a different flavour. What you are arguing is akin to arguing over if revolvers are more deadly with pearl handles or wood.
 
Then how do Cluesforum's fantasies compare with those who believe there are NO conspiracies at all? Those who trust the government and other authorities totally are a bit naive, but at least they don't create their own fantasy beliefs. For example, J. Edgar Hoover said that the claim that there was an American mafia was just a conspiracy theory. And then later it turned out that there actually was a mafia operating within the U.S. So debunkers at that time who trusted the authority of Hoover were wrong, and were a bit naive.
 
Wow, they went so far that even Anders found the limits of his own nonsense? That's pretty *********** far.
 
Horatius said:
Wow, they went so far that even Anders found the limits of his own nonsense? That's pretty *********** far.
Click to expand...

I actually think September Clues was, and still is in a way, a good documentary. But then even the filmmaker himself, a guy named Simon, says this:

"Quite frankly, it is becoming very hard for me to believe that people still believe in satellites - but I guess that's just me! In any case, I feel that I have evolved since this very thread started in August 2011. I sure wasn't quite ready to accept the non-existence of satellites back then." -- http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1070&start=585

:eek:
 
I must have misread.
Did Anders call utter BS out for being utter BS?

What's happening to this world?
 
ComfySlippers said:
I must have misread.
Did Anders call utter BS out for being utter BS?

What's happening to this world?
Click to expand...

One of AL's techniques of trolling is to automatically take a contrary position, on any subject especially those he doesn't know anything about. It's his style as noted above, Cluesforum holds similar ideas to himself with the same level of evidence.....
 
Tomtomkent said:
Equally ridiculous, just a different flavour. What you are arguing is akin to arguing over if revolvers are more deadly with pearl handles or wood.
Click to expand...

Wow. If Anders is their voice of reason, these people at Cluesforum must be complete football bats.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom